Friend vs. Foe: Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Women With Different Hormonal States

Empathy is crucial for social functioning as well as social coherence. It can be influenced by modulatory factors such as familiarity and liking (i.e., emotional closeness). Furthermore, there are first hints that hormonal status may modulate affective but not cognitive empathy in women. The aim of...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Frontiers in neuroscience 2021-03, Vol.15, p.608768-608768
Main Authors:	Kimmig, Ann-Christin Sophie, Wildgruber, Dirk, Wendel, Sina-Maria Ute, Sundström-Poromaa, Inger, Derntl, Birgit
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	affective empathy Brain Cognitive ability cognitive empathy emotional closeness Emotions Empathy Familiarity Females hormonal status Hormones Menstruation Neuroscience oral contraceptives Social interaction Social research Testosterone
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Empathy is crucial for social functioning as well as social coherence. It can be influenced by modulatory factors such as familiarity and liking (i.e., emotional closeness). Furthermore, there are first hints that hormonal status may modulate affective but not cognitive empathy in women. The aim of this study was to investigate potential separate as well as combined modulatory effects of emotional closeness and hormonal status on female cognitive and affective empathy. Three hormonal status groups of women ( = 62) were studied: (1) naturally-cycling (NC) women in the early follicular phase (fNC), (2) NC women during periovulatory phase (oNC), and (3) oral contraceptive (OC) users. All women underwent a newly developed empathy task (i.e., Tübinger Empathy Test, TET) presenting textual descriptions of positive and negative emotional scenes relating to three different perspectives (i.e., self vs. friend vs. enemy/disliked person). Regardless of hormonal status, empathic responses were higher for the friend compared to the enemy perspective for both empathy components. However, cognitive empathy was less affected by varying emotional closeness toward the target person than affective empathy. Hormonal status modulated only affective empathy. OC users showed significantly less affective empathy toward the enemy compared to the fNC women. Overall, affective empathy seems more sensitive to modulatory effects of emotional closeness and hormonal status than cognitive empathy. Possible implications of this current investigation for future research on empathy and OC use, contraceptive education as well as for other clinical applications are discussed.
ISSN:	1662-4548 1662-453X 1662-453X