Loading…
Patient Preferences for Receiving Test Results at San Francisco Bay Area Free Clinics: A Multi-Site Evaluation
Background: Laboratory follow-up is a critical aspect of patient care, and clinicians and patients communicate via both in-person and remote channels. Patient preferences for different modalities and the impact of experiencing in-person versus phone follow-up on future preferences are not well under...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of student-run clinics 2019-01, Vol.5 (1) |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: Laboratory follow-up is a critical aspect of patient care, and clinicians and patients communicate via both in-person and remote channels. Patient preferences for different modalities and the impact of experiencing in-person versus phone follow-up on future preferences are not well understood, especially in safety net settings.
Methods: We conducted a survey of 235 patients at two San Francisco Bay Area student-run free clinics to ascertain patient preferences for in-person and phone follow-up. We determined the clinical complexity of laboratory follow-up and overall patient care by conducting a chart review of 113 surveyed patients who received lab results and all 579 patients who received care at either clinic.
Results: Patients naïve to laboratory follow-up reported similar preferences for in-person (32%) and phone (36%) follow-up (p=0.58). Patients who received results in-person subsequently reported a greater preference for future in-person follow-up (65%, p=0.003), whereas preference for phone follow-up (43%, p=0.69) did not shift after experiencing this modality. Patients with more complex follow-up (e.g., altering medications or ordering additional diagnostic studies, versus routine health counseling) reported a greater preference for receiving results in-person (p=0.013) and a lower preference for receiving results by phone (p=0.036).
Conclusions: Patients’ preferences for receiving test results shift significantly after experiencing certain modalities (i.e., in-person) but not others (i.e., phone), and these shifts may be associated with the clinical complexity of laboratory follow-up. Future research should explore the utility of these findings in personalizing laboratory follow-up to optimize care delivery and quality in safety net settings. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2474-9354 2474-9354 |
| DOI: | 10.59586/jsrc.v5i1.81 |