Interference Competition and Temporal and Habitat Partitioning in Two Gerbil Species

We have tested two hypotheses which may explain two different patterns which underlie coexistence in two species of desert gerbils (Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum). The two patterns are temporal partitioning of foraging activity and shared preference habitat selection. When sympatric, G. pyrami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oikos 1993-03, Vol.66 (2), p.237-246
Main Authors: Ziv, Yaron, Abramsky, Zvika, Kotler, Burt P., Subach, Aziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Density
Deserts
Dunes
Ecological competition
Foraging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gerbils
Habitat preferences
Habitat selection
Rodents
Sand
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We have tested two hypotheses which may explain two different patterns which underlie coexistence in two species of desert gerbils (Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum). The two patterns are temporal partitioning of foraging activity and shared preference habitat selection. When sympatric, G. pyramidum uses the early part of the night most heavily while G. allenbyi is most active in the late part of the night. Although both species prefer the same habitat type (semistabilized sand dune), in the presence of G. pyramidum, G. allenbyi utilizes mainly the secondary habitat type (stabilized sand dune). The hypotheses are 1) one species is dominant (G. pyramidum) while the other (G. allenbyi) is an energetically more efficient forager, and 2) one species has the ability to quickly harvest seeds in dense resource patches and the other species can harvest seeds profitable at lower resource densities. We tested the hypotheses in an experiment conducted in four enclosed plots. Two additional unfenced plots served as controls. Two of the enclosed plots contained mixed populations of both species while the other two fenced plots contained G. allenbyi only. In contrast to patterns of activity of G. allenbyi with G. pyramidum present, G. allenbyi is also very active early in the night even on the semistabilized dunes when G. pyramidum is absent. The results of the experiment supported the hypothesis that interference is the key factor to understanding the coexistence of the two species. Both the temporal and spatial patterns are the result of the dominant G. pyramidum species excluding the energetically efficient G. allenbyi from the preferred time of activity and habitat type.
ISSN:0030-1299
1600-0706
DOI:10.2307/3544810