Reduced tillage, rye residues, and herbicides influence weed suppression and yield of pumpkins

Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of various tillage and mulching practices on fruit maturity and weed suppression in pumpkins. Conventional tillage (CT), disking, no tillage with rye removed (RR), no tillage with standing rye (SR), and strip tillage (ST) were evaluated with and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2004-10, Vol.18 (4), p.953-961
Main Authors: Rapp, H.S, Bellinder, R.R, Wien, H.C, Vermeylen, F.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
crop yield
Cucurbita pepo
Fruits
Herbicides
No tillage
plant residues
Plants
Reduced tillage
Rye
Secale cereale
Soil water
Tillage
Weed control
Weeds
zucchini
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of various tillage and mulching practices on fruit maturity and weed suppression in pumpkins. Conventional tillage (CT), disking, no tillage with rye removed (RR), no tillage with standing rye (SR), and strip tillage (ST) were evaluated with and without ethalfluralin plus halosulfuron (1.5 plus 0.036 kg ai/ha, respectively) applied preemergence. In 2001, when heavy rain after herbicide application caused significant crop injury, the herbicides delayed maturity and significantly reduced yields of mature pumpkins within each herbicide treatment, total yields did not differ with tillage. In 2002, weed populations were significantly greater than those in 2001, and in 2002, regardless of herbicides, yields of mature fruit were greater in tillage treatments with higher rye residues (SR, ST). Although weed populations were less in one year than the other, herbicides provided effective control in both seasons, and RR, ST, and SR effectively suppressed weeds compared with CT. Averaged over treatments, greater yield losses were attributable to weed competition (42%) in 2002 than to herbicide injury (32%) in 2001.
ISSN:0890-037X
1550-2740
DOI:10.1614/WT-03-136R