A systematic performance evaluation of clustering methods for single-cell RNA-seq data [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Subpopulation identification, usually via some form of unsupervised clustering, is a fundamental step in the analysis of many single-cell RNA-seq data sets. This has motivated the development and application of a broad range of clustering methods, based on various underlying algorithms. Here, we pro...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	F1000 research 2018, Vol.7, p.1141
Main Authors:	Duò, Angelo, Robinson, Mark D, Soneson, Charlotte
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Algorithms Cluster Analysis Gene Expression Profiling Humans RNA, Small Cytoplasmic - biosynthesis RNA, Small Cytoplasmic - genetics Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods Single-Cell Analysis - methods Software
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Subpopulation identification, usually via some form of unsupervised clustering, is a fundamental step in the analysis of many single-cell RNA-seq data sets. This has motivated the development and application of a broad range of clustering methods, based on various underlying algorithms. Here, we provide a systematic and extensible performance evaluation of 12 clustering algorithms, including both methods developed explicitly for scRNA-seq data and more general-purpose methods. The methods were evaluated using 9 publicly available scRNA-seq data sets as well as three simulations with varying degree of cluster separability. The same feature selection approaches were used for all methods, allowing us to focus on the investigation of the performance of the clustering algorithms themselves. We evaluated the ability of recovering known subpopulations, the stability and the run time of the methods. Additionally, we investigated whether the performance could be improved by generating consensus partitions from multiple individual clustering methods. We found substantial differences in the performance, run time and stability between the methods, with SC3 and Seurat showing the most favorable results. Additionally, we found that consensus clustering typically did not improve the performance compared to the best of the combined methods, but that several of the top-performing methods already perform some type of consensus clustering. The R scripts providing an extensible framework for the evaluation of new methods and data sets are available on GitHub ( https://github.com/markrobinsonuzh/scRNAseq_clustering_comparison).
ISSN:	2046-1402 2046-1402