Top-down attention modulates neural responses in neurotypical, but not ADHD, young adults

Individuals differ in their ability to selectively attend to goal-relevant auditory stimuli. People with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in particular tend to show cognitive deficits associated with inhibition and attention. We hypothesized that people with ADHD would exhibit poorer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2021-10, Vol.150 (4), p.A64-A64
Main Authors: Kwasa, Jasmine, Noyce, Abigail, Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Individuals differ in their ability to selectively attend to goal-relevant auditory stimuli. People with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in particular tend to show cognitive deficits associated with inhibition and attention. We hypothesized that people with ADHD would exhibit poorer performance and weaker neural signatures of attention when undertaking a challenging auditory task that required strong top-down attentional control. Neurotypical (N = 20) and ADHD (N = 25) young adults with normal hearing listened to one of three concurrent, spatially separated speech streams and reported the order of the syllables presented while we recorded electroencephalography (EEG). We tested both the ability to sustain attentional focus on a single “target” stream and the ability to monitor the target but flexibly switch attention to an unpredictable “interrupter” stream from another direction if and when it appeared. In both groups, the interrupter evoked larger neural responses when it was to be attended compared to when it was irrelevant, including for the P3a “reorienting” response previously described as involuntary. This attentional modulation was weaker in ADHD listeners, even though their behavioral performance was no lower. Additionally, individual performance correlated with the degree of top-down modulation of neural responses. These results demonstrate that listeners differ in their ability to modulate neural representations of sound based on task goals.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/10.0007633