413 The Effect of Harvest Method and Ammoniation of Corn Residue on Growing Calf Performance

Abstract Corn residue is a valuable feed resource for cattle, and both harvesting technologies and chemical treatment can influence the feeding value of baled residue. Utilizing 120 crossbred steers (319 ± 22 kg), a randomized complete block design study with a 3 x 2 factorial treatment structure wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2018-04, Vol.96 (suppl_2), p.221-222
Main Authors: Conway, A C, Bondurant, R G, MacDonald, J C, Klopfenstein, T J, Drewnoski, M E
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Corn residue is a valuable feed resource for cattle, and both harvesting technologies and chemical treatment can influence the feeding value of baled residue. Utilizing 120 crossbred steers (319 ± 22 kg), a randomized complete block design study with a 3 x 2 factorial treatment structure was conducted with the objective of assessing animal intake, gain, and feed efficiency when fed diets containing corn residue harvested using three different methods, with or without ammoniation. Animals were individually fed one of six diets for 84 d via Calan gates. Diets contained 65% baled corn residue which was either untreated or ammoniated, and harvested one of three ways: conventionally harvested rake-and-bale method (CONV), harvested using the New Holland Cornrower™ with two rows of stem chopped into the windrow with tailings (2ROW), or harvested using the EZ-Bale system (EZB) with a disengaged combine spreader and all tailings added to the windrow. Randomly selected bales of each harvest method were chemically treated with anhydrous ammonia at 3.7% of DM for 60 d in late fall (CONVAM, 2RAM, EZBAM). The remaining diet ingredients consisted of 30% wet distillers grains and 5% supplement which contained trace minerals, limestone, monensin and Soypass. No interactions (P = 0.40) between harvest method and chemical treatment were observed. Corn residue harvested as 2ROW resulted in increased (P
ISSN:0021-8812
1525-3163
DOI:10.1093/jas/sky073.410