P-446 Personalization of the euploid embryo transfer guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with >1 previous failed transfer

Abstract Study question Does personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) increase reproductive outcome in patients with >1 previous failed transfer of an euploid embryo? Summary answer pET guided by ERA resulted in a significantly higher Pregnancy Rate (PR)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2024-07, Vol.39 (Supplement_1)
Main Authors: Valbuena Perilla, D, Gómez, C, Stankewicz, T, Castellón, J  A, Al Asmar, N, Simón, C, Rubio, C, Ruiz, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Study question Does personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) increase reproductive outcome in patients with >1 previous failed transfer of an euploid embryo? Summary answer pET guided by ERA resulted in a significantly higher Pregnancy Rate (PR), Ongoing Pregnancy Rate (OGPR) and Live Birth Rate (LBR) versus standard embryo transfer. What is known already pET consists of synchronizing embryo transfer with the optimal endometrial receptivity status by the transcriptomics identification of the personalized window of implantation (WOI). Euploid transfers improve reproductive outcome controlling the embryo contribution in the implantation. Controversial results have been published regarding the clinical usefulness of pET in a range of clinical indications. Here we present data from patients with >1 previous failed embryo transfer (ET) in a subsequent euploid ET. Study design, size, duration Multicenter retrospective study involving 270 patients with at least one previous implantation failure between 2017 and 2021. These patients were divided into two groups according to their subsequent transfer: study group (pET guided by ERA) (n = 200), and control group (standard transfer) (n = 70). All the ET were done in Hormone Replacement Therapy cycles (HRT). PR, OGPR and LBR were compared between the two groups. Participants/materials, setting, methods Age, body mass index, previous failed attempts, inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) quality of the transferred embryos were compared between the groups. Study group had an ERA result as standard WOI or displaced WOI and pET of an euploid embryo was carried out in a subsequent HRT cycle (following the same conditions and recommendations provided by ERA). Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied to quantitative comparations. Chi-square test was done for categorical variables. Main results and the role of chance Clinical results in terms of PR, OGPR and LBR were significantly higher when pET guided by ERA was performed when compared to the non-ERA group. PR was 65% (130/200) in pET versus 37.14% (26/70) in control group (P = 0.000088); OGPR was 49% (98/200) in pET versus 27.14% (19/70) in control group (P = 0.0024); and LBR was 48.20% (95/197) in pET versus 26.09% (18/69) in control group (P = 0.0022). Control and demographics variables did not show differences between the two groups: Age: 35.27 ± 3.86 versus 35.77 ± 3.35 (P = 0.31); BMI: 22.99 ± 3.02 versus 23.25 ± 3.
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae108.795