Loading…

Early echocardiographic predictors of unfavorable yearly prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective to determine the most informative in the prognostic plan echocardiographic indices in patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus. Methods A retrospective analysis of outcomes of 97 diabetic patients with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2022-02, Vol.23 (Supplement_1)
Main Authors: Alieva, RB, Srojidinova, NZ, Pirnazarov, MM, Nikishin, AG, Abdullaeva, SYA
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective to determine the most informative in the prognostic plan echocardiographic indices in patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus. Methods A retrospective analysis of outcomes of 97 diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with lesions of two or more coronary arteries was performed. All patients received conventional basic therapy comprising, acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, beta-blocker, an ACE inhibitor, statins, and insulin therapy on a stationary phase for a minimum of 2 weeks, followed by a transition to oral antidiabetics. According to the 12 month follow depending on the outcomes two groups were established: favorable prognosis n = 46 and unfavorable prognosis n = 51, having one or more of the following complications: death, reinfarction (nonfatal), development or progression of heart failure. Results Differences in echocardiographic parameters, characterizing myocardial hypertrophy of left ventricular (LV) were revealed between patients with different outcomes of AMI. Thus, patients with adverse outcome were characterized by a significant increase of LV mass (from 191.2 ± 35.7g to 255.7 ± 46.2 g, p = 0.004) and LV posterior wall thickness (from 8.7 ± 1.04mm to 10.6 ± 1.37mm, p = 0.004) in dynamics. Moreover, a smaller LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was observed in the group with an unfavorable outcome (both initially and in dynamics), as well as large LV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume. Single-factor analysis has shown, that EF
ISSN:2047-2404
2047-2412
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeab289.412