Uncoordinated dances associated with high reproductive success in a crane

Why do crane pairs dance? We showed uncoordinated dances associated with high reproductive success. Dance duration increased as the breeding season approached. The results partially supported the hypothesis that pair dances contribute to a pair bond. This is the first study to assess the role of pai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral ecology 2019-03, Vol.30 (1), p.101-106
Main Authors: Takeda, Kohei F, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, Mariko, Kutsukake, Nobuyuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Why do crane pairs dance? We showed uncoordinated dances associated with high reproductive success. Dance duration increased as the breeding season approached. The results partially supported the hypothesis that pair dances contribute to a pair bond. This is the first study to assess the role of pair dances in these animals. Abstract Coordinated mutual displays by 2 individuals are believed to play important roles in social and sexual communication. Although previous studies have described mutual displays in birds, few have conducted quantitative analyses. To understand the role of mutual signals, we investigated the reproductive function of pair dances in the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis). We used an information theory approach to quantify the characteristics of the pair dance and tested the classical “pair bond hypothesis,” which states that the elaborate dance is related to reproductive success. We found that characteristics of the pair dances were related to reproductive success, but the results were not always consistent with the predictions. Dance duration increased as the breeding season approached. However, the past reproductive success of an individual was negatively related to dance coordination (i.e., mutual information) of a pair. These results partially support the pair bond hypothesis, but more importantly, also suggest the need to define the vague concept of a “pair bond” in a biologically reasonable, measurable way.
ISSN:1045-2249
1465-7279
DOI:10.1093/beheco/ary159