Solution-based synthesis of kesterite thin film semiconductors

Large-scale deployment of photovoltaic modules is required to power our renewable energy future. Kesterite, Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4, is a p-type semiconductor absorber layer with a tunable bandgap consisting of earth abundant elements, and is seen as a potential 'drop-in' replacement to Cu(In,Ga)S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JPhys Energy 2020-01, Vol.2 (1), p.12003
Main Authors: Todorov, T, Hillhouse, H W, Aazou, S, Sekkat, Z, Vigil-Galán, O, Deshmukh, S D, Agrawal, R, Bourdais, S, Valdés, M, Arnou, P, Mitzi, D B, Dale, P J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Absorbers
Copper indium gallium selenides
Efficiency
electrodeposition
Energy conversion efficiency
Hydrazines
Impurities
Inks
kesterite
Ligands
nanoparticle
Nanoparticles
P-type semiconductors
Photovoltaic cells
Questions
Se
Solar cells
solution processing
Solvents
Synthesis
Thin films
ZnSn(S
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Large-scale deployment of photovoltaic modules is required to power our renewable energy future. Kesterite, Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4, is a p-type semiconductor absorber layer with a tunable bandgap consisting of earth abundant elements, and is seen as a potential 'drop-in' replacement to Cu(In,Ga)Se2 in thin film solar cells. Currently, the record light-to-electrical power conversion efficiency (PCE) of kesterite-based devices is 12.6%, for which the absorber layer has been solution-processed. This efficiency must be increased if kesterite technology is to help power the future. Therefore two questions arise: what is the best way to synthesize the film? And how to improve the device efficiency? Here, we focus on the first question from a solution-based synthesis perspective. The main strategy is to mix all the elements together initially and coat them on a surface, followed by annealing in a reactive chalcogen atmosphere to react, grow grains and sinter the film. The main difference between the methods presented here is how easily the solvent, ligands, and anions are removed. Impurities impair the ability to achieve high performance (>∼10% PCE) in kesterite devices. Hydrazine routes offer the least impurities, but have environmental and safety concerns associated with hydrazine. Aprotic and protic based molecular inks are environmentally friendlier and less toxic, but they require the removal of organic and halogen species associated with the solvent and precursors, which is challenging but possible. Nanoparticle routes consisting of kesterite (or binary chalcogenides) particles require the removal of stabilizing ligands from their surfaces. Electrodeposited layers contain few impurities but are sometimes difficult to make compositionally uniform over large areas, and for metal deposited layers, they have to go through several solid-state reaction steps to form kesterite. Hence, each method has distinct advantages and disadvantages. We review the state-of-the art of each and provide perspective on the different strategies.
ISSN:2515-7655
2515-7655
DOI:10.1088/2515-7655/ab3a81