Hypoxic volume is more responsive than hypoxic area to nutrient load reductions in the northern Gulf of Mexico-and it matters to fish and fisheries

While impacts of low oxygen on marine organisms have been reviewed from physiological and ecological perspectives, relating broad population- and ecosystem-level effects to the areal extent of hypoxia (dissolved oxygen concentration below 64 M, or 2 mg l−1) has proven difficult. We suggest that hypo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research letters 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.24012
Main Authors: Scavia, Donald, Justi, Dubravko, Obenour, Daniel R, Craig, J Kevin, Wang, Lixia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dissolved oxygen
Ecological effects
Fish
Fisheries
Gulf of Mexico
Hypoxia
hypoxic volume
Marine organisms
nitrogen
Nutrient loading
Physiological effects
Thickness
Three dimensional models
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While impacts of low oxygen on marine organisms have been reviewed from physiological and ecological perspectives, relating broad population- and ecosystem-level effects to the areal extent of hypoxia (dissolved oxygen concentration below 64 M, or 2 mg l−1) has proven difficult. We suggest that hypoxic volume is a more appropriate metric compared to hypoxic area because volume better integrates the effects of hypoxia on ecological processes relevant to many marine taxa. In this paper, we compare the volume-based load responses from a simple biophysical model with results from an independent three-dimensional hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model, and discuss the implications with respect to potentially more ecologically-relevant hypoxia management goals. We also show that hypoxic volume appears more sensitive than hypoxic area to nutrient load reductions. Model simulations indicate that even under a modest 25% nitrogen load reduction, the thickness of the hypoxic layer in the northern Gulf of Mexico decreases markedly, and hypoxia remains localized to a relatively thin layer near the bottom that most fish and other mobile organisms can more effectively avoid. This finding should be considered when reviewing and potentially setting hypoxia management goals.
ISSN:1748-9326
1748-9326
DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/aaf938