Performance investigation of an ejector expansion refrigeration system working on different alternative refrigerants to R134a

In this paper, the performance characteristics of an ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle using six low GWP alternative refrigerants for R134a are presented through the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The ejector is modelled by assuming a constant-mixing pressure. The investigated refriger...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian journal of mechanical engineering 2023-10, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-12
Main Authors: Al-Chlaihawi, Kadhim K. Idan, Al- Rubaye, Ahmed, Kadhim, Hakim T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ejector expansion
low-GWP
performance improvement
VCRC
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, the performance characteristics of an ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle using six low GWP alternative refrigerants for R134a are presented through the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The ejector is modelled by assuming a constant-mixing pressure. The investigated refrigerants are compared based on the optimum ejector area ratio, discharge temperature, volumetric cooling capacity (VCC), coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency (η ex ). The drop-in analysis is considered based on the same operating/designing parameters, and the VCC, COP and η ex improvements over the conventional refrigeration cycle are presented. The improvements in COP and VCC are between 7.914%-18.46% and 5.712%-22.82%, respectively, for the investigated range of evaporating and condensing temperatures. These values are higher than that of R134a by about 21% and 16%, respectively. The VCC using R1234yf is very close to R134a with a maximum reduction of 6.5%. Therefore, R1234yf refrigerant appears to be the best alternative to R134a in an ejector-expansion system with an appreciable COP and ηex devaluation. R152a outperforms R134a in terms of COP and ηex, thus it is a suitable alternative to R134a except for safety.
ISSN:1448-4846
2204-2253
DOI:10.1080/14484846.2022.2030092