When open source design is vital: critical making of DIY healthcare equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical devices needed during the COVID-19 pandemic were widely reported in early 2020. In response, civic DIY volunteers explored how they could produce the required equipment. Members of communities such as hacker- and makerspaces employed their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health sociology review 2020-05, Vol.29 (2), p.158-167
Main Author: Richterich, Annika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
COVID-19
COVID-19 - prevention & control
critical making
DIY communities
Equipment Design
hacking
Health administration
healthcare equipment
Humans
Masks - standards
Masks - supply & distribution
open source
Personal Protective Equipment - standards
Personal Protective Equipment - supply & distribution
Private Sector
Protective Devices
SARS-CoV-2
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical devices needed during the COVID-19 pandemic were widely reported in early 2020. In response, civic DIY volunteers explored how they could produce the required equipment. Members of communities such as hacker- and makerspaces employed their skills and tools to manufacture, for example, face shields and masks. The article discusses these civic innovation practices and their broader social implications by relating them to critical making theory. Methodologically, it is based on a digital ethnography approach, focusing on hacker and maker communities in the UK. Communities' DIY initiatives display characteristics of critical making and 'craftivism', as they assessed and counteracted politicised healthcare supply shortages. It is argued that their manufacturing activities during the COVID pandemic relate to UK austerity politics' effects on healthcare and government failure to ensure medical crisis supplies. Facilitated by open source design, communities' innovation enabled healthcare emergency equipment. At the same time, their DIY manufacturing raises practical as well as ethical issues concerning, among other things, efficacy and safety of use.
ISSN:1446-1242
1839-3551
DOI:10.1080/14461242.2020.1784772