On law and economic inequality: A response to Philip Alston
In ‘The Right to Social Insecurity: A Human Rights Perspective on the Evolution of Australian Welfare Policy’,(Australian Journal of Human Rights, 24:3, 253-275) Philip Alston provides an insightful analysis of the complex relationship between human rights and economic inequality. In this short comm...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian journal of human rights 2018-11, Vol.24 (3), p.276-280 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In ‘The Right to Social Insecurity: A Human Rights Perspective on the Evolution of Australian
Welfare Policy’,(Australian Journal of Human Rights, 24:3, 253-275) Philip Alston provides an insightful analysis of the complex relationship between human rights and economic inequality. In this short comment, however, I want to highlight two important ways in which current human rights approaches may need to be developed if human rights are to serve the role Alston argues for: first, to address more directly the needs of the middle class; and, second, to encompass a notion of relative, not—just absolute—adequacy for certain goods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1323-238X 2573-573X |