Acute Effects of Virtual Reality Exercise Biking on College Students' Physical Responses

Purpose: Current evidence regarding the use of commercially available immersive virtual reality (VR) headsets and compatible VR exercise apparatus in the promotion of individuals' physical activity (PA) is lacking. This exploratory study investigated the acute effects of a VirZoom VR exercise b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport 2022-09, Vol.93 (3), p.633-639
Main Authors: Zeng, Nan, Liu, Wenxi, Pope, Zachary C., McDonough, Daniel J., Gao, Zan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acute effects
Adult
Bicycling - physiology
College students
Computer applications
Computer Simulation
Cycling
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exergaming
Female
Humans
pedal revolution counts
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Physical training
rating of perceived exertion
Students
Virtual Reality
VirZoom
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: Current evidence regarding the use of commercially available immersive virtual reality (VR) headsets and compatible VR exercise apparatus in the promotion of individuals' physical activity (PA) is lacking. This exploratory study investigated the acute effects of a VirZoom VR exercise bike (vBike) on college students' physical responses compared to an exergaming bike (eBike) and a traditional stationary exercise bike (tBike). Method: Forty-eight college students (34 females, X age  = 23.58 ± 3.39; X BMI  = 23.81 ± 3.57) completed three separate 20-minute cycling sessions on the vBike, eBike, and tBike in a counterbalanced order. Outcomes included rating of perceived exertion (RPE), assessed at 4-minute intervals throughout each cycling session, and overall PA, operationalized as pedal revolution counts (PRC) during each session. Results: Linear models indicated significant group differences between exercise modalities for RPE (F (2,138) = 14.76-27.30, all p < .001, η 2  = 0.17-0.27) and PRC (F (2,138) = 74.862, p < .001, η 2  = 0.48). Pairwise comparisons revealed that RPE was reported significantly higher at each time point (i.e., 4th minute, 8th minute, 12th minute, 16th minute, and 20th minute) during the tBike session vs. the vBike and eBike sessions (p < .001) and that participants had higher PRC during the vBike session vs. the eBike and tBike sessions (p < .001). Conclusion: A commercially available VR exercise bike would trigger greater overall PA as compared to exergaming and traditional cycling while being perceived less intense. Future intervention studies conducted in real-world settings to determine cause and effect relationship are warranted.
ISSN:0270-1367
2168-3824
DOI:10.1080/02701367.2021.1891188