The Role of the Rhythm Step on Pro-Agility Test Performance in Division I Football Players

Purpose: The pro-agility test is a common test in multiple sports. A common way to start is the crossover step (CS) where athletes start the drill by crossing one leg over the other. However, the rhythm step (RS), initiated by moving one foot medially before crossing the opposite foot over the first...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport 2021-07, Vol.92 (3), p.529-536
Main Authors: Papadopoulos, Panayiotis, Lund, Robin J., Ficklin, Travis K., Reed, Jacob P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceleration
false step
muscle spindles
stretch reflex
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: The pro-agility test is a common test in multiple sports. A common way to start is the crossover step (CS) where athletes start the drill by crossing one leg over the other. However, the rhythm step (RS), initiated by moving one foot medially before crossing the opposite foot over the first, may result in faster time. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the RS to the CS in the pro-agility test. Methods: Thirteen division I college football players (age 21 ± 1.5 years, mass 103.5 ± 18 kg, and stature 1.87 ± .078 m) were recruited to perform both step techniques. Video was analyzed to determine times during the first five yards (t 1 ), the second ten yards (t 2 ), the last five yards (t 3 ), and the total time (t total ). Additionally, maximum acceleration (a max ), time to maximum acceleration (t amax ), maximum body lean angle (θ lean ), and time to reach θ lean (t θlean ) were measured. Results: Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were calculated for all variables. A significant difference between the two techniques was observed at t 1 (RS mean 1.56 ± 0.09 s, CS mean 1.62 ± 0.11 s), t total (RS mean 4.99 ± 0.35 s, CS mean 5.09 ± 0.35 s), and t amax (RS mean 0.38 ± 0.67, CS mean 0.46 ± 0.61). Conclusion: Overall, the RS appeared to be superior to the CS for reaching peak acceleration faster during the initial phase of the pro-agility drill as well as short distance sprints that are initiated from a standing position.
ISSN:0270-1367
2168-3824
DOI:10.1080/02701367.2020.1756195