BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7 Differentially Utilize Cell Surface Receptors to Induce Osteoblastic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily of growth factors and are used clinically to induce new bone formation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate receptor utilization by BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-6, and BMP-7 in primary human mesenchymal stem ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2008-07, Vol.283 (30), p.20948-20958
Main Authors: Lavery, Karen, Swain, Pamela, Falb, Dean, Alaoui-Ismaili, Moulay Hicham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bone Marrow Cells - cytology
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - metabolism
Cell Differentiation
Cell Membrane - metabolism
Dimerization
Gene Expression Regulation
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cells - cytology
Models, Biological
Osteoblasts - cytology
Osteoblasts - metabolism
Signal Transduction
Tissue Distribution
Transforming Growth Factor beta - metabolism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily of growth factors and are used clinically to induce new bone formation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate receptor utilization by BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-6, and BMP-7 in primary human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC), a physiologically relevant cell type that probably mediates the in vivo effects of BMPs. RNA interference-mediated gene knockdown revealed that osteoinductive BMP activities in hMSC are elicited through the type I receptors ACVR1A and BMPR1A and the type II receptors ACVR2A and BMPR2. BMPR1B and ACVR2B were expressed at low levels and were not found to play a significant role in signaling by any of the BMPs evaluated in this study. Type II receptor utilization differed significantly between BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7. A greater reliance on BMPR2 was observed for BMP-2/4 relative to BMP-6/7, whereas ACVR2A was more critical to signaling by BMP-6/7 than BMP-2/4. Significant differences were also observed for the type I receptors. Although BMP-2/4 used predominantly BMPR1A for signaling, ACVR1A was the preferred type I receptor for BMP-6/7. Signaling by both BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7 was mediated by homodimers of ACVR1A or BMPR1A. A portion of BMP-2/4 signaling also required concurrent BMPR1A and ACVR1A expression, suggesting that BMP-2/4 signal in part through ACVR1A/BMPR1A heterodimers. The capacity of ACVR1A and BMPR1A to form homodimers and heterodimers was confirmed by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analyses. These results suggest different mechanisms for BMP-2/4- and BMP-6/7-induced osteoblastic differentiation in primary hMSC.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M800850200