Reply to comments on “Chronology and environmental context of the early prehistoric peopling of Kamchatka, the Russian north far east (Ponkratova, I. Yu., Chlachula, J., Clausen. I, Quaternary Science Reviews 252 (2021), by Yaroslav V. Kuzmin”

Reply to comments on “Chronology and environmental context of the early prehistoric peopling of Kamchatka, the Russian north far east (Ponkratova, I. Yu., Chlachula, J., Clausen. I, Quaternary Science Reviews 252 (2021), by Yaroslav V. Kuzmin”

Here, we respond to the comments of Y. Kuzmin on the conclusions of our investigations at the multi-layered Ushki V site, central Kamchatka, published in the paper of I. Yu. Ponkratova and others (QSR, 2021). The critical opinion of the site chronology as well as the final Pleistocene-Holocene cultu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary science reviews 2021-08, Vol.266, p.107049, Article 107049
Main Authors: Ponkratova, Irina Yu, Chlachula, Jiri, Clausen, Ingo
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Kamchatka
Pottery
Radiocarbon
Tephrochronology
Ushki V
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Here, we respond to the comments of Y. Kuzmin on the conclusions of our investigations at the multi-layered Ushki V site, central Kamchatka, published in the paper of I. Yu. Ponkratova and others (QSR, 2021). The critical opinion of the site chronology as well as the final Pleistocene-Holocene cultural sequence classification and the provenience of the most ancient pottery on the peninsula we find unsubstantiated and provide the supporting arguments.
ISSN:0277-3791
1873-457X