Impact of the Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Stent Thrombosis

Impact of the Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Stent Thrombosis

Objectives We evaluated the impact of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) on the frequency of stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death in randomized controlled trials comparing the EES to non–everolimus-eluting drug-eluting stents (EE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011-10, Vol.58 (15), p.1569-1577
Main Authors: Baber, Usman, MD, MS, Mehran, Roxana, MD, Sharma, Samin K., MD, Brar, Somjot, MD, MPH, Yu, Jennifer, MD, Suh, Jung-Won, MD, PhD, Kim, Hyo-Soo, MD, PhD, Park, Seung-Jung, MD, PhD, Kastrati, Adnan, MD, de Waha, Antoinette, MD, Krishnan, Prakash, MD, Moreno, Pedro, MD, Sweeny, Joseph, MD, Kim, Michael C., MD, Suleman, Javed, MD, Pyo, Robert, MD, Wiley, Jose, MD, Kovacic, Jason, MD, PhD, Kini, Annapoorna S., MD, Dangas, George D., MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Cardiovascular
drug-eluting stent
everolimus-eluting
Internal Medicine
stent thrombosis
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives We evaluated the impact of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) on the frequency of stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death in randomized controlled trials comparing the EES to non–everolimus-eluting drug-eluting stents (EE-DES). Background Whether or not the unique properties of the EES translate into reductions in ST remains unknown. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Internet sources for articles comparing outcomes between EES and non–EE-DES without language or date restriction. Randomized controlled trials reporting the frequency of ST were included. Variables relating to patient and study characteristics and clinical endpoints were extracted. Results We identified 13 randomized trials (n = 17,101) with a weighted mean follow-up of 21.7 months. Compared with non–EE-DES, the EES significantly reduced ST (relative risk [RR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.78; p = 0.001), TVR (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.92; p = 0.004), and MI (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.96; p = 0.02). There was no difference in cardiac mortality between the groups (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.16; p = 0.38). The treatment effect was consistent by different follow-up times and duration of clopidogrel use. The treatment effects increased with higher baseline risks of the respective control groups with the strongest correlation observed for ST (R2 = 0.89, p < 0.001). Conclusions Intracoronary implantation of the EES is associated with highly significant reductions in ST with concordant reductions in TVR and MI compared to non–EE-DES. Whether these effects apply to different patient subgroups and DES types merits further investigation.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597