Research ethics beyond the IRB: Selection bias and the direction of innovation in applied economics
Principles for ethical behavior in the context of research are codified into rules that may change over time to meet peoples’ needs in specific institutions, including universities and professional associations. This paper aims to spark discussion about a set of ethical choices beyond those addresse...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Applied economic perspectives and policy 2021-12, Vol.43 (4), p.1352-1365 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Principles for ethical behavior in the context of research are codified into rules that may change over time to meet peoples’ needs in specific institutions, including universities and professional associations. This paper aims to spark discussion about a set of ethical choices beyond those addressed by an IRB or recent association policy statements. Our specific focus is topic selection and the role of researchers’ interests and incentives in determining the kinds of research that we do. Using the principle of induced innovation, we show how changing incentives can influence the direction of research effort and thereby affect the kinds of policies or technologies that are supported by available evidence. With this paper, we hope to generate discussion among applied economists about selection bias in research and how we can use insights from economics itself to guide topic selection.
JEL CLASSIFICATION
A11; A14; B41; Q00
Related Content: What Do you Mean by “Informed Consent”? Ethics in Economic Development Research
Related Content: The Evolving Ethics of Analysis, Publication, and Transparency in Applied Economics
Related Content: Ulysses' pact or Ulysses' raft: Using pre‐analysis plans in experimental and nonexperimental research |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2040-5790 2040-5804 |