Critical pedagogies and the theatre laboratory
This dialogue contributes reflections on the 'theatre laboratory' to the scholarly debate surrounding methodologies of drama education and applied performance. The co-authors suggest that the experimental and ensemble-led approach of the Samuel Beckett Laboratory, founded at Trinity Colleg...
Saved in:
Published in: | Research in drama education 2017-04, Vol.22 (2), p.282-287 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This dialogue contributes reflections on the 'theatre laboratory' to the scholarly debate surrounding methodologies of drama education and applied performance. The co-authors suggest that the experimental and ensemble-led approach of the Samuel Beckett Laboratory, founded at Trinity College Dublin in 2013 as a space for research into Beckett in performance, may offer one response to a question that Kathleen Gallagher proposes in the twentieth Anniversary issue of RiDE (20.3), concerning 'how drama educators might incorporate such practices of hope into their pedagogy' [2015. "Beckoning Hope and Care." RIDE: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Drama Education 20 (3): 423]. This work suggests that the hopeful practice of laboratory exploration de-hierarchises a scholarly endeavour and recasts the student as co-creator of knowledge, rather than consumer of cultural capital. The values and practices of such a laboratory may open one avenue of participatory pedagogy that scaffolds risk and re-values failure. In the dialogue that follows, we draw on Gallagher's 'practices of hope' to develop our own interests in the subjunctivity of performance pedagogies in Beckettian contexts [cf. Heron, J., N. Johnson, B. Dinçel, G. Quinn, S. J. Scaife, and Á. Tyrrell, 2014. "The Samuel Beckett Laboratory 2013." Journal of Beckett Studies 23 (1): 73-94]. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1356-9783 1470-112X |