A model of transient internal flow and atomization of propellant/ethanol mixtures in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI)

This paper reports the extension to binary propellant/excipient mixtures of the multiphase model of transient internal flow and atomisation in pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) of Gavtash et al. (2017a-b) for propellant-only flows. The work considers different accounts of the effect of less...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barzin Gavtash, Hendrik Versteeg, Graham Hargrave, Benjamin J. Myatt, David Lewis, Tanya Church, G. Brambilla
Format: Default Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/33450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper reports the extension to binary propellant/excipient mixtures of the multiphase model of transient internal flow and atomisation in pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) of Gavtash et al. (2017a-b) for propellant-only flows. The work considers different accounts of the effect of less volatile ethanol on the saturated vapour pressure (SVP), viscosity and surface tension of HFA-based pMDI formulations. Representation of the SVP of HFA/ethanol mixtures by Raoult’s law is compared with the empirical model developed by Gavtash et al. (2016) as well as different theoretical mixing rules for surface tension and viscosity. For initial ethanol contents ranging from 0 to 20% by mass, the temperature, pressure and spray velocity were predicted to be almost independent of ethanol concentration when using the empirical SVP model of Gavtash et al. (2016). The predicted aerosol droplet size increases with increasing concentration of ethanol. These model predictions compare favourab ly with phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) measurements of pMDI sprays. Exploration of model predictions with different mixing rules suggest that variations of the dynamic viscosity could result in 0.7 µm droplet size change, and different surface tension models yield around 1.5 µm droplet size change. The findings of this work challenge the view that the increase of droplet size is caused by the low volatility of excipients such as ethanol. Instead, attention is focused on composition-dependent viscosity and surface tension as potential controlling parameters with significant effect on the droplet size of HFA/ethanol sprays.