Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach

Product modularity is often seen as a means by which a product system can be decomposed into smaller, more manageable chunks in order to better manage design, manufacturing and after-sales complexity. The most common approach is to decompose the product down to component level and then group the com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael J. Lee
Format: Default Thesis
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/6208
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rr-article-9544682
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-95446822010-01-01T00:00:00Z Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach Michael J. Lee (7153229) Mechanical engineering not elsewhere classified untagged Mechanical Engineering not elsewhere classified Product modularity is often seen as a means by which a product system can be decomposed into smaller, more manageable chunks in order to better manage design, manufacturing and after-sales complexity. The most common approach is to decompose the product down to component level and then group the components to form modules. The rationale for module grouping can vary, from the more technical physical and functional component interactions, to any number of strategic objectives such as variety, maintenance and recycling. The problem lies with the complexity of product modularity under these multiple (often conflicting) objectives. The research in this thesis presents a holistic multi-objective computer aided modularity optimisation (CAMO) framework. The framework consists of four main steps: 1) product decomposition; 2) interaction analysis; 3) formation of modular architectures and; 4) scenario analysis. In summary of these steps: the product is first decomposed into a number a basic components by analysis of both the physical and functional product domains. The various dependencies and strategic similarities that occur between the product s components are then analysed and entered into a number of interaction matrixes. A specially developed multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm (MOGGA) then searches the matrices and provides a whole set of alternative (yet optimal) modular product configurations. The solution set is then evaluated and explored (scenario analysis) using the principles of Analytic Hierarchy Process. A software prototype has been created for the CAMO framework using Visual Basic to create a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) based optimiser within an excel environment. A case study has been followed to demonstrate the various steps of the framework and make comparisons with previous works. Unlike previous works, that have used simplistic optimisation algorithms and have in general only considered a limited number of modularisation objectives, the developed framework provides a true multi-objective approach to the product modularisation problem. 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Thesis 2134/6208 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Product_modularity_a_multi-objective_configuration_approach/9544682 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
institution Loughborough University
collection Figshare
topic Mechanical engineering not elsewhere classified
untagged
Mechanical Engineering not elsewhere classified
spellingShingle Mechanical engineering not elsewhere classified
untagged
Mechanical Engineering not elsewhere classified
Michael J. Lee
Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
description Product modularity is often seen as a means by which a product system can be decomposed into smaller, more manageable chunks in order to better manage design, manufacturing and after-sales complexity. The most common approach is to decompose the product down to component level and then group the components to form modules. The rationale for module grouping can vary, from the more technical physical and functional component interactions, to any number of strategic objectives such as variety, maintenance and recycling. The problem lies with the complexity of product modularity under these multiple (often conflicting) objectives. The research in this thesis presents a holistic multi-objective computer aided modularity optimisation (CAMO) framework. The framework consists of four main steps: 1) product decomposition; 2) interaction analysis; 3) formation of modular architectures and; 4) scenario analysis. In summary of these steps: the product is first decomposed into a number a basic components by analysis of both the physical and functional product domains. The various dependencies and strategic similarities that occur between the product s components are then analysed and entered into a number of interaction matrixes. A specially developed multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm (MOGGA) then searches the matrices and provides a whole set of alternative (yet optimal) modular product configurations. The solution set is then evaluated and explored (scenario analysis) using the principles of Analytic Hierarchy Process. A software prototype has been created for the CAMO framework using Visual Basic to create a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) based optimiser within an excel environment. A case study has been followed to demonstrate the various steps of the framework and make comparisons with previous works. Unlike previous works, that have used simplistic optimisation algorithms and have in general only considered a limited number of modularisation objectives, the developed framework provides a true multi-objective approach to the product modularisation problem.
format Default
Thesis
author Michael J. Lee
author_facet Michael J. Lee
author_sort Michael J. Lee (7153229)
title Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
title_short Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
title_full Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
title_fullStr Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
title_full_unstemmed Product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
title_sort product modularity: a multi-objective configuration approach
publishDate 2010
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/6208
_version_ 1799098281127575552