Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors: results of a large-scale survey
Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and “soundness-only” peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their “soundness.” Thi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Simon Wakeling, Claire Creaser, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Valerie Spezi, Peter Willett, Monica Paramita |
---|---|
Format: | Default Article |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/38111 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Open-access mega-journals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: motivations)
by: Simon Wakeling, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Open Access Mega Journal survey data
by: Claire Creaser, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Open-access mega-journals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: operational realities)
by: Simon Wakeling, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Academic communities: the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication
by: Simon Wakeling, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review
by: Valerie Spezi, et al.
Published: (2017)