The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes

Purpose: To use Social Exchange Theory (SET) to examine a model where supportive (SMB) and unsupportive (UMB) manager behaviors interact to predict employees’ engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intention. Design/Methodology: A cross-sectional online survey collected data from 252 UK based emp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Teoh, Iain Coyne, D. Devonish, P. Leather, A. Zarola
Format: Default Article
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/20814
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rr-article-9500573
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-95005732016-09-05T00:00:00Z The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes K. Teoh (7198598) Iain Coyne (1259835) D. Devonish (7198601) P. Leather (7198604) A. Zarola (7198607) Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified Supportive manager behaviors Unsupportive manager behaviors Social exchange theory Job satisfaction Engagement Turnover intention Business and Management not elsewhere classified Purpose: To use Social Exchange Theory (SET) to examine a model where supportive (SMB) and unsupportive (UMB) manager behaviors interact to predict employees’ engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intention. Design/Methodology: A cross-sectional online survey collected data from 252 UK based employees of a global data management company. Findings: Factor analysis confirmed manager behaviors to consist of two constructs: supportive and unsupportive behaviors. Structural equation modelling indicated SMB predicted job satisfaction and turnover intentions, but not engagement. Job satisfaction, but not engagement, mediated the SMB-turnover intention relationship. UMB only predicted job dissatisfaction. Neither job satisfaction nor engagement mediated the UMB-turnover intention relationship. UMB undermined the positive relationship between SMB and turnover intention. Implications: The behaviors assessed can be integrated into various stages of a manager’s development process to serve as guidelines of good practice. Crucially, findings suggest managers can exhibit both supportive and unsupportive behaviors, and that consistency in behaviors is important. The study also provides evidence that supportive managers can help reduce turnover intention through job satisfaction. Originality/value: SET was used as a framework for SMB, UMB and engagement. To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the interaction between SMB and UMB. 2016-09-05T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/20814 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_interaction_between_supportive_and_unsupportive_manager_behaviors_on_employee_work_attitudes/9500573 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
institution Loughborough University
collection Figshare
topic Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified
Supportive manager behaviors
Unsupportive manager behaviors
Social exchange theory
Job satisfaction
Engagement
Turnover intention
Business and Management not elsewhere classified
spellingShingle Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified
Supportive manager behaviors
Unsupportive manager behaviors
Social exchange theory
Job satisfaction
Engagement
Turnover intention
Business and Management not elsewhere classified
K. Teoh
Iain Coyne
D. Devonish
P. Leather
A. Zarola
The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
description Purpose: To use Social Exchange Theory (SET) to examine a model where supportive (SMB) and unsupportive (UMB) manager behaviors interact to predict employees’ engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intention. Design/Methodology: A cross-sectional online survey collected data from 252 UK based employees of a global data management company. Findings: Factor analysis confirmed manager behaviors to consist of two constructs: supportive and unsupportive behaviors. Structural equation modelling indicated SMB predicted job satisfaction and turnover intentions, but not engagement. Job satisfaction, but not engagement, mediated the SMB-turnover intention relationship. UMB only predicted job dissatisfaction. Neither job satisfaction nor engagement mediated the UMB-turnover intention relationship. UMB undermined the positive relationship between SMB and turnover intention. Implications: The behaviors assessed can be integrated into various stages of a manager’s development process to serve as guidelines of good practice. Crucially, findings suggest managers can exhibit both supportive and unsupportive behaviors, and that consistency in behaviors is important. The study also provides evidence that supportive managers can help reduce turnover intention through job satisfaction. Originality/value: SET was used as a framework for SMB, UMB and engagement. To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the interaction between SMB and UMB.
format Default
Article
author K. Teoh
Iain Coyne
D. Devonish
P. Leather
A. Zarola
author_facet K. Teoh
Iain Coyne
D. Devonish
P. Leather
A. Zarola
author_sort K. Teoh (7198598)
title The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
title_short The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
title_full The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
title_fullStr The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
title_full_unstemmed The interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
title_sort interaction between supportive and unsupportive manager behaviors on employee work attitudes
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/20814
_version_ 1797374768651960320