Loading…

The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution

This thesis discusses the work of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in the field of conflict prevention, management and resolution, from 1990 until late 1998. Two theoretical perspectives, neo-realism and neo-liberal institutionalism, provide a framework for analysis. Bo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zoe Hibell
Format: Default Thesis
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/7357
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1805988499664404480
author Zoe Hibell
author_facet Zoe Hibell
author_sort Zoe Hibell (7187318)
collection Figshare
description This thesis discusses the work of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in the field of conflict prevention, management and resolution, from 1990 until late 1998. Two theoretical perspectives, neo-realism and neo-liberal institutionalism, provide a framework for analysis. Both theories are able to highlight different strengthsa nd weaknesses in the OSCE's approach which are described in three case studies. However, neither theory can fully explain the findings of the case studies. In the thesis's conclusion the shortcomings of both theories are discussed and the gaps in explanation are explored by reference to constructivist approaches. Three case studies are described in order to demonstrate different facets of the OSCE's work. Macedonia provides an example of the OSCE's work in conflict prevention (it is in the field of conflict prevention that the OSCE is seen at its most successful). The second case study, Nagomo-Karabakh, examines the OSCE's handling of an ongoing conflict and attempts to arrange both a peace conference and a peacekeeping mission. The issues surrounding the conflict here demonstrate the complexity of external involvement in mediation and negotiation processes, and the difficulties of trying to find solutions that are acceptable to the parties in a context complicated further by the interests of external actors. The third case study is an analysis of the OSCE's engagement in the post-conflict reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This reveals the problems of implementing aspects of an unsatisfactory peace agreement. The case study highlights the enormity of the tasks assigned to the OSCE and the lack of coherent international support for the organisation's work. It also discusses the effects of the interplay of both external and internal power political struggles on the OSCE's operations. The thesis concludes that the OSCE has in limited ways performed valuable work in all three case studies but that its real strengths are most apparent in the field of conflict prevention.
format Default
Thesis
id rr-article-9469694
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2000
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-94696942000-01-01T00:00:00Z The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution Zoe Hibell (7187318) Political science not elsewhere classified Conflict prevention Security Cooperation Conflict management Political Science not elsewhere classified This thesis discusses the work of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in the field of conflict prevention, management and resolution, from 1990 until late 1998. Two theoretical perspectives, neo-realism and neo-liberal institutionalism, provide a framework for analysis. Both theories are able to highlight different strengthsa nd weaknesses in the OSCE's approach which are described in three case studies. However, neither theory can fully explain the findings of the case studies. In the thesis's conclusion the shortcomings of both theories are discussed and the gaps in explanation are explored by reference to constructivist approaches. Three case studies are described in order to demonstrate different facets of the OSCE's work. Macedonia provides an example of the OSCE's work in conflict prevention (it is in the field of conflict prevention that the OSCE is seen at its most successful). The second case study, Nagomo-Karabakh, examines the OSCE's handling of an ongoing conflict and attempts to arrange both a peace conference and a peacekeeping mission. The issues surrounding the conflict here demonstrate the complexity of external involvement in mediation and negotiation processes, and the difficulties of trying to find solutions that are acceptable to the parties in a context complicated further by the interests of external actors. The third case study is an analysis of the OSCE's engagement in the post-conflict reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This reveals the problems of implementing aspects of an unsatisfactory peace agreement. The case study highlights the enormity of the tasks assigned to the OSCE and the lack of coherent international support for the organisation's work. It also discusses the effects of the interplay of both external and internal power political struggles on the OSCE's operations. The thesis concludes that the OSCE has in limited ways performed valuable work in all three case studies but that its real strengths are most apparent in the field of conflict prevention. 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Thesis 2134/7357 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_OSCE_and_conflict_prevention_management_and_resolution/9469694 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Political science not elsewhere classified
Conflict prevention
Security
Cooperation
Conflict management
Political Science not elsewhere classified
Zoe Hibell
The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title_full The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title_fullStr The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title_full_unstemmed The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title_short The OSCE and conflict prevention, management and resolution
title_sort osce and conflict prevention, management and resolution
topic Political science not elsewhere classified
Conflict prevention
Security
Cooperation
Conflict management
Political Science not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/7357