Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes

In this paper we report the results of an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that when faced with a question involving the inverse direction of a reversible mathematical process, students solve a multiple-choice version by verifying the answers presented to them by the direct method, not by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Sangwin, Ian Jones
Format: Default Article
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/22120
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rr-article-9368276
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-93682762017-01-01T00:00:00Z Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes Chris Sangwin (1248255) Ian Jones (1384110) Assessment Algebra Calculus Symbolic manipulation In this paper we report the results of an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that when faced with a question involving the inverse direction of a reversible mathematical process, students solve a multiple-choice version by verifying the answers presented to them by the direct method, not by undertaking the actual inverse calculation. Participants responded to an online test contain- ing equivalent multiple-choice and constructed-response items in two reversible algebraic techniques: factor/expand and solve/verify. The ndings supported this hypothesis: Overall scores were higher in the multiple-choice condition compared to the constructed-response condition, but this advantage was significantly greater for items concerning the inverse direction of reversible processes compared to those involving direct processes. 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/22120 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Asymmetry_in_student_achievement_on_multiple-choice_and_constructed-response_items_in_reversible_mathematics_processes/9368276 CC BY 4.0
institution Loughborough University
collection Figshare
topic Assessment
Algebra
Calculus
Symbolic manipulation
spellingShingle Assessment
Algebra
Calculus
Symbolic manipulation
Chris Sangwin
Ian Jones
Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
description In this paper we report the results of an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that when faced with a question involving the inverse direction of a reversible mathematical process, students solve a multiple-choice version by verifying the answers presented to them by the direct method, not by undertaking the actual inverse calculation. Participants responded to an online test contain- ing equivalent multiple-choice and constructed-response items in two reversible algebraic techniques: factor/expand and solve/verify. The ndings supported this hypothesis: Overall scores were higher in the multiple-choice condition compared to the constructed-response condition, but this advantage was significantly greater for items concerning the inverse direction of reversible processes compared to those involving direct processes.
format Default
Article
author Chris Sangwin
Ian Jones
author_facet Chris Sangwin
Ian Jones
author_sort Chris Sangwin (1248255)
title Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
title_short Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
title_full Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
title_fullStr Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
title_sort asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/22120
_version_ 1798098862601142272