Investigating the role of attention in the identification of associativity shortcuts using a microgenetic measure of implicit shortcut use

Many mathematics problems can be solved in different ways or by using different strategies. Good knowledge of arithmetic principles is important for identifying and using strategies that are more sophisticated. For example, the problem ‘6 + 38 − 35’ can be solved through a shortcut strategy where th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanne Eaves, Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge
Format: Default Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/11799939.v1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many mathematics problems can be solved in different ways or by using different strategies. Good knowledge of arithmetic principles is important for identifying and using strategies that are more sophisticated. For example, the problem ‘6 + 38 − 35’ can be solved through a shortcut strategy where the subtraction ‘38 − 35’ is performed before the addition ‘3 + 6 = 9’, a strategy which is derived from the arithmetic principle of associativity. However, both children and adults make infrequent use of this shortcut and the reasons for this are currently unknown. To uncover these reasons, new sensitive measures of strategy identification and use must first be developed, which was one goal of our research. We built a novel method to detect the time-point when individuals first identify an arithmetic strategy, based on a trial-by-trial response time data. Our second goal was to use this measure to investigate the contribution of one particular factor, attention, in the identification of the associativity shortcut. In two studies, we found that manipulating visual attention made no difference to the number of people who identified the shortcut, the trial number on which they first identified it, or their accuracy and response time for solving shortcut problems. We discuss the theoretical and methodological contribution of our findings, and argue that the origin of people’s difficulty with associativity shortcuts may lie beyond attention.