Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes

We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Georgiadou, Spyros Angelopoulos, Helen Drake
Format: Default Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/11278526.v1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rr-article-11278526
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-112785262019-12-18T00:00:00Z Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes Elena Georgiadou (1250367) Spyros Angelopoulos (8050916) Helen Drake (1252419) Distributed computing and systems software not elsewhere classified Information systems not elsewhere classified Library and information studies not elsewhere classified Big data analytics Sentiment analysis International negotiations Brexit Decision making Policy making Information Systems Library and Information Studies Distributed Computing We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes to inform government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes. 2019-12-18T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/11278526.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Big_data_analytics_and_international_negotiations_sentiment_analysis_of_Brexit_negotiating_outcomes/11278526 CC BY 4.0
institution Loughborough University
collection Figshare
topic Distributed computing and systems software not elsewhere classified
Information systems not elsewhere classified
Library and information studies not elsewhere classified
Big data analytics
Sentiment analysis
International negotiations
Brexit
Decision making
Policy making
Information Systems
Library and Information Studies
Distributed Computing
spellingShingle Distributed computing and systems software not elsewhere classified
Information systems not elsewhere classified
Library and information studies not elsewhere classified
Big data analytics
Sentiment analysis
International negotiations
Brexit
Decision making
Policy making
Information Systems
Library and Information Studies
Distributed Computing
Elena Georgiadou
Spyros Angelopoulos
Helen Drake
Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
description We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes to inform government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes.
format Default
Article
author Elena Georgiadou
Spyros Angelopoulos
Helen Drake
author_facet Elena Georgiadou
Spyros Angelopoulos
Helen Drake
author_sort Elena Georgiadou (1250367)
title Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
title_short Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
title_full Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
title_fullStr Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes
title_sort big data analytics and international negotiations: sentiment analysis of brexit negotiating outcomes
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/11278526.v1
_version_ 1797551152410132480