Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR–Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR–...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Nucleic acids research 2021-02, Vol.49 (4), p.2114-2125
Main Authors:	León, Lina M, Park, Allyson E, Borges, Adair L, Zhang, Jenny Y, Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Bacteriophages - genetics Bacteriophages - metabolism CRISPR-Associated Proteins - metabolism CRISPR-Cas Systems DNA Cleavage Interspersed Repetitive Sequences Molecular Biology Pseudomonas aeruginosa - genetics Pseudomonas aeruginosa - immunology Pseudomonas aeruginosa - virology Viral Proteins - metabolism
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Abstract Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR–Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR–Cas subtype has lagged because it lacks an in vivo phage-host model system. Here, we show the anti-phage function of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-C CRISPR–Cas system encoded on a conjugative pKLC102 island, and its Acr-mediated inhibition by distinct MGEs. Seven genes with anti-Type I-C function (acrIC genes) were identified, many with highly acidic amino acid content, including previously described DNA mimic AcrIF2. Four of the acr genes were broad spectrum, also inhibiting I-E or I-F P. aeruginosa CRISPR–Cas subtypes. Dual inhibition comes at a cost, however, as simultaneous expression of Type I-C and I-F systems renders phages expressing the dual inhibitor AcrIF2 more sensitive to targeting. Mutagenesis of numerous acidic residues in AcrIF2 did not impair anti-I-C or anti-I-F function per se but did exacerbate inhibition defects during competition, suggesting that excess negative charge may buffer DNA mimics against competition. Like AcrIF2, five of the Acr proteins block Cascade from binding DNA, while two function downstream, likely preventing Cas3 recruitment or activity. One such inhibitor, AcrIC3, is found in an ‘anti-Cas3’ cluster within conjugative elements, encoded alongside bona fide Cas3 inhibitors AcrIF3 and AcrIE1. Our findings demonstrate an active battle between an MGE-encoded CRISPR–Cas system and its diverse MGE targets.
ISSN:	0305-1048 1362-4962