Loading…

Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships

Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology letters (2005) 2010-12, Vol.6 (6), p.769-772
Main Authors: Weiser, Michael D., Sanders, Nathan J., Agosti, Donat, Andersen, Alan N., Ellison, Aaron M., Fisher, Brian L., Gibb, Heloise, Gotelli, Nicholas J., Gove, Aaron D., Gross, Kevin, Guénard, Benoit, Janda, Milan, Kaspari, Michael, Lessard, Jean-Philippe, Longino, John T., Majer, Jonathan D., Menke, Sean B., McGlynn, Terrence P., Parr, Catherine L., Philpott, Stacy M., Retana, Javier, Suarez, Andrew V., Vasconcelos, Heraldo L., Yanoviak, Stephen P., Dunn, Robert R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93
container_end_page 772
container_issue 6
container_start_page 769
container_title Biology letters (2005)
container_volume 6
creator Weiser, Michael D.
Sanders, Nathan J.
Agosti, Donat
Andersen, Alan N.
Ellison, Aaron M.
Fisher, Brian L.
Gibb, Heloise
Gotelli, Nicholas J.
Gove, Aaron D.
Gross, Kevin
Guénard, Benoit
Janda, Milan
Kaspari, Michael
Lessard, Jean-Philippe
Longino, John T.
Majer, Jonathan D.
Menke, Sean B.
McGlynn, Terrence P.
Parr, Catherine L.
Philpott, Stacy M.
Retana, Javier
Suarez, Andrew V.
Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.
Yanoviak, Stephen P.
Dunn, Robert R.
description Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance–diversity relationships, and not differences in climate–diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance–diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rsbl_2010_0151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>851464649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtjVPC-Nt7QaIRUKQIJL7am-XdnTQum92tx6kIJ_4D_5BfgqOUiApB5cPMaB6_M_ZbFI8ZTBlU9lmkuptyyCUwxe4Uh8xIOamUObu7zzU7KB4QXQAIY0DdLw44SM2tVYfF6cz3w7gpfd-WXUgJY05T6YlwVXf-HKmkpY9YUliFzsey6cLKJ_z5_QeN2ITcb7GnkDZlxM6nMPS0DCM9LO4tfEf46DoeFZ9evfw4O5nM371-M3sxnzS6YmliFbdeylrDAjh4r4xukHGsrKzaZqFRc2XAVK3ARoEUSvlaLxpoa2Zq1VbiqHi-0x3X9QrbBvsUfefGmLeMGzf44G52-rB058OVEwBMKJ4Fnl4LxOFyjZTcKlCDXed7HNbkrGJS51PdTnJmhBbqdtJoqSRwKzI53ZFNHIgiLvabM3Bbg93WYLc12G0Nzhee_PnePf7b0QyIHRCHTf74IVuUNu5iWMc-l_-W9f-79f7D8fxKB-3ACgZSWlDuWxh3KtoFojXmeFP07xmT3YxACb_uN_fxi9NGGOU-W-mO52_1yRk37lT8Avva5Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>764540283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships</title><source>Royal Society Package S</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weiser, Michael D. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Agosti, Donat ; Andersen, Alan N. ; Ellison, Aaron M. ; Fisher, Brian L. ; Gibb, Heloise ; Gotelli, Nicholas J. ; Gove, Aaron D. ; Gross, Kevin ; Guénard, Benoit ; Janda, Milan ; Kaspari, Michael ; Lessard, Jean-Philippe ; Longino, John T. ; Majer, Jonathan D. ; Menke, Sean B. ; McGlynn, Terrence P. ; Parr, Catherine L. ; Philpott, Stacy M. ; Retana, Javier ; Suarez, Andrew V. ; Vasconcelos, Heraldo L. ; Yanoviak, Stephen P. ; Dunn, Robert R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Michael D. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Agosti, Donat ; Andersen, Alan N. ; Ellison, Aaron M. ; Fisher, Brian L. ; Gibb, Heloise ; Gotelli, Nicholas J. ; Gove, Aaron D. ; Gross, Kevin ; Guénard, Benoit ; Janda, Milan ; Kaspari, Michael ; Lessard, Jean-Philippe ; Longino, John T. ; Majer, Jonathan D. ; Menke, Sean B. ; McGlynn, Terrence P. ; Parr, Catherine L. ; Philpott, Stacy M. ; Retana, Javier ; Suarez, Andrew V. ; Vasconcelos, Heraldo L. ; Yanoviak, Stephen P. ; Dunn, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><description>Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance–diversity relationships, and not differences in climate–diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance–diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20462885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ants - physiology ; Community Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Formicidae ; Global Diversity Gradients ; Linear Models ; Models, Biological ; Population Density ; Species Richness ; Species Specificity ; Trees ; Tropical Climate ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2010-12, Vol.6 (6), p.769-772</ispartof><rights>2010 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2010 The Royal Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001352/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001352/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,3343,27179,27957,27958,53827,53829,55909,55919</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20462885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agosti, Donat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Alan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibb, Heloise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotelli, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gove, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guénard, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janda, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaspari, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessard, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longino, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majer, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, Sean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Terrence P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Catherine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpott, Stacy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retana, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Andrew V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanoviak, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><title>Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><description>Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance–diversity relationships, and not differences in climate–diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance–diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants - physiology</subject><subject>Community Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Global Diversity Gradients</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Species Richness</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtjVPC-Nt7QaIRUKQIJL7am-XdnTQum92tx6kIJ_4D_5BfgqOUiApB5cPMaB6_M_ZbFI8ZTBlU9lmkuptyyCUwxe4Uh8xIOamUObu7zzU7KB4QXQAIY0DdLw44SM2tVYfF6cz3w7gpfd-WXUgJY05T6YlwVXf-HKmkpY9YUliFzsey6cLKJ_z5_QeN2ITcb7GnkDZlxM6nMPS0DCM9LO4tfEf46DoeFZ9evfw4O5nM371-M3sxnzS6YmliFbdeylrDAjh4r4xukHGsrKzaZqFRc2XAVK3ARoEUSvlaLxpoa2Zq1VbiqHi-0x3X9QrbBvsUfefGmLeMGzf44G52-rB058OVEwBMKJ4Fnl4LxOFyjZTcKlCDXed7HNbkrGJS51PdTnJmhBbqdtJoqSRwKzI53ZFNHIgiLvabM3Bbg93WYLc12G0Nzhee_PnePf7b0QyIHRCHTf74IVuUNu5iWMc-l_-W9f-79f7D8fxKB-3ACgZSWlDuWxh3KtoFojXmeFP07xmT3YxACb_uN_fxi9NGGOU-W-mO52_1yRk37lT8Avva5Xw</recordid><startdate>20101223</startdate><enddate>20101223</enddate><creator>Weiser, Michael D.</creator><creator>Sanders, Nathan J.</creator><creator>Agosti, Donat</creator><creator>Andersen, Alan N.</creator><creator>Ellison, Aaron M.</creator><creator>Fisher, Brian L.</creator><creator>Gibb, Heloise</creator><creator>Gotelli, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Gove, Aaron D.</creator><creator>Gross, Kevin</creator><creator>Guénard, Benoit</creator><creator>Janda, Milan</creator><creator>Kaspari, Michael</creator><creator>Lessard, Jean-Philippe</creator><creator>Longino, John T.</creator><creator>Majer, Jonathan D.</creator><creator>Menke, Sean B.</creator><creator>McGlynn, Terrence P.</creator><creator>Parr, Catherine L.</creator><creator>Philpott, Stacy M.</creator><creator>Retana, Javier</creator><creator>Suarez, Andrew V.</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.</creator><creator>Yanoviak, Stephen P.</creator><creator>Dunn, Robert R.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101223</creationdate><title>Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships</title><author>Weiser, Michael D. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Agosti, Donat ; Andersen, Alan N. ; Ellison, Aaron M. ; Fisher, Brian L. ; Gibb, Heloise ; Gotelli, Nicholas J. ; Gove, Aaron D. ; Gross, Kevin ; Guénard, Benoit ; Janda, Milan ; Kaspari, Michael ; Lessard, Jean-Philippe ; Longino, John T. ; Majer, Jonathan D. ; Menke, Sean B. ; McGlynn, Terrence P. ; Parr, Catherine L. ; Philpott, Stacy M. ; Retana, Javier ; Suarez, Andrew V. ; Vasconcelos, Heraldo L. ; Yanoviak, Stephen P. ; Dunn, Robert R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants - physiology</topic><topic>Community Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Global Diversity Gradients</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Species Richness</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agosti, Donat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Alan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibb, Heloise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotelli, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gove, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guénard, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janda, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaspari, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessard, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longino, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majer, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, Sean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Terrence P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Catherine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpott, Stacy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retana, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Andrew V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanoviak, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiser, Michael D.</au><au>Sanders, Nathan J.</au><au>Agosti, Donat</au><au>Andersen, Alan N.</au><au>Ellison, Aaron M.</au><au>Fisher, Brian L.</au><au>Gibb, Heloise</au><au>Gotelli, Nicholas J.</au><au>Gove, Aaron D.</au><au>Gross, Kevin</au><au>Guénard, Benoit</au><au>Janda, Milan</au><au>Kaspari, Michael</au><au>Lessard, Jean-Philippe</au><au>Longino, John T.</au><au>Majer, Jonathan D.</au><au>Menke, Sean B.</au><au>McGlynn, Terrence P.</au><au>Parr, Catherine L.</au><au>Philpott, Stacy M.</au><au>Retana, Javier</au><au>Suarez, Andrew V.</au><au>Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.</au><au>Yanoviak, Stephen P.</au><au>Dunn, Robert R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><stitle>Biol. Lett</stitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><date>2010-12-23</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>769</spage><epage>772</epage><pages>769-772</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><notes>href:rsbl20100151.pdf</notes><notes>ArticleID:rsbl20100151</notes><notes>ark:/67375/V84-BLN6HX27-W</notes><notes>istex:5D4B3D2F2714081E40E664ED554C54CEC866917C</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance–diversity relationships, and not differences in climate–diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance–diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>20462885</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9561
ispartof Biology letters (2005), 2010-12, Vol.6 (6), p.769-772
issn 1744-9561
1744-957X
language eng
recordid cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rsbl_2010_0151
source Royal Society Package S; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Ants - physiology
Community Ecology
Ecosystem
Formicidae
Global Diversity Gradients
Linear Models
Models, Biological
Population Density
Species Richness
Species Specificity
Trees
Tropical Climate
Weather
title Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate–species density relationships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T02%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canopy%20and%20litter%20ant%20assemblages%20share%20similar%20climate%E2%80%93species%20density%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Weiser,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=2010-12-23&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=772&rft.pages=769-772&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E851464649%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8528a44b60f020aa576ce12e9849dcf6e6257079d3ec504355ab6fc0db17b5d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=764540283&rft_id=info:pmid/20462885&rfr_iscdi=true