Loading…

Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most prevalent cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance could be high among the causative agent. The purpose of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance, biofilm production, and biofilm-associated gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microbiology insights 2022-01, Vol.15, p.117863612211352-11786361221135224
Main Authors: Dawadi, Prabin, Khanal, Santosh, Prasai Joshi, Tista, KC, Sudeep, Tuladhar, Reshma, Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi, Darai, Anjani, Joshi, Dev Raj
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143
container_end_page 11786361221135224
container_issue
container_start_page 117863612211352
container_title Microbiology insights
container_volume 15
creator Dawadi, Prabin
Khanal, Santosh
Prasai Joshi, Tista
KC, Sudeep
Tuladhar, Reshma
Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi
Darai, Anjani
Joshi, Dev Raj
description Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most prevalent cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance could be high among the causative agent. The purpose of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance, biofilm production, and biofilm-associated genes, bcsA and csgD, and sub-inhibitory hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stimulation in UPEC for biofilm formation. A total of 71 UPEC were collected from a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu and subjected to identify antibiotic susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion. The biofilm formation was assessed using microtiter culture plate method while pellicle formation was tested by a tube method. In representative 15 isolates based on biofilm-forming ability, bcsA and csgD were screened by conventional polymerase chain reaction, and treated with sub-lethal H2O2. The UPEC were found the most susceptible to meropenem (90.2%), and the least to ampicillin (11.3%) in vitro and 90.1% of them were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Most UPEC harbored biofilm-producing ability (97.2%), and could form pellicle at 37°C. Among representative 15 isolates, csgD was detected only among 10 isolates (66.67%) while bcsA gene was present in 13 isolates (86.67%). This study revealed that level of biofilm production elevated after sub-lethal H2O2 treatment (P = .041). These findings suggested that the pathogens are emerging as MDR. The biofilm production is high and the majority of selected strains contained bcsA and csgD genes. Pellicle formation test was suggestive to be an alternative qualitative method to screen biofilm production in UPEC. The sub-inhibitory concentration of H2O2 may contribute in increasing biofilm formation in UPEC.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/11786361221135224
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9677168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_11786361221135224</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2792831648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtr3TAQhU1poSHJD-hO0E0XcaLXtaRNIQ15QaChadZCluXrCbZ0I8mhl_75yNzQV6gWo-HMOR8SU1UfCD4mRIiTUmTDGkIpIWxFKX9T7S1avYhv_-jfV4cpPeByGCOSsb3q56nP0ELIYNE3lyBl4607Ql8g9DBO6CLEyWQIHhnfobu5ra_9UAI5xC262nYxrJ1Hty6GH9A5dJdhmsddADy6j2Fj8rB4Cv882cFFsAMYZMMIB9W73ozJHb7c-9X9xfn3s6v65uvl9dnpTW2plLxWVsmGK2Uk57xvlTAY94ZiypQ1tmtUvxK9k4SvMOECE7pqhRC2wbS1vMhsv_q8427mdnKddT5HM-pNhMnErQ4G9N8TD4NehyetGiFIIwvg0wsghsfZpawnSNaNo_EuzElTwZTglCpWrB__sT6EOfryveJSVDLS8AVIdi4bQ0rR9b8eQ7BeVqpfrbRkjneZZNbuN_X_gWfwsKGt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792831648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Dawadi, Prabin ; Khanal, Santosh ; Prasai Joshi, Tista ; KC, Sudeep ; Tuladhar, Reshma ; Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi ; Darai, Anjani ; Joshi, Dev Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Dawadi, Prabin ; Khanal, Santosh ; Prasai Joshi, Tista ; KC, Sudeep ; Tuladhar, Reshma ; Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi ; Darai, Anjani ; Joshi, Dev Raj</creatorcontrib><description>Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most prevalent cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance could be high among the causative agent. The purpose of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance, biofilm production, and biofilm-associated genes, bcsA and csgD, and sub-inhibitory hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stimulation in UPEC for biofilm formation. A total of 71 UPEC were collected from a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu and subjected to identify antibiotic susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion. The biofilm formation was assessed using microtiter culture plate method while pellicle formation was tested by a tube method. In representative 15 isolates based on biofilm-forming ability, bcsA and csgD were screened by conventional polymerase chain reaction, and treated with sub-lethal H2O2. The UPEC were found the most susceptible to meropenem (90.2%), and the least to ampicillin (11.3%) in vitro and 90.1% of them were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Most UPEC harbored biofilm-producing ability (97.2%), and could form pellicle at 37°C. Among representative 15 isolates, csgD was detected only among 10 isolates (66.67%) while bcsA gene was present in 13 isolates (86.67%). This study revealed that level of biofilm production elevated after sub-lethal H2O2 treatment (P = .041). These findings suggested that the pathogens are emerging as MDR. The biofilm production is high and the majority of selected strains contained bcsA and csgD genes. Pellicle formation test was suggestive to be an alternative qualitative method to screen biofilm production in UPEC. The sub-inhibitory concentration of H2O2 may contribute in increasing biofilm formation in UPEC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-6361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/11786361221135224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ampicillin ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Biofilms ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Genes ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Meropenem ; Multidrug resistance ; Original Research ; Pellicle ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Stimulation ; Urinary tract</subject><ispartof>Microbiology insights, 2022-01, Vol.15, p.117863612211352-11786361221135224</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2792831648?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,25783,27957,27958,37047,37048,44625,53827,53829</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dawadi, Prabin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasai Joshi, Tista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KC, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuladhar, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darai, Anjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Dev Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli</title><title>Microbiology insights</title><description>Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most prevalent cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance could be high among the causative agent. The purpose of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance, biofilm production, and biofilm-associated genes, bcsA and csgD, and sub-inhibitory hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stimulation in UPEC for biofilm formation. A total of 71 UPEC were collected from a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu and subjected to identify antibiotic susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion. The biofilm formation was assessed using microtiter culture plate method while pellicle formation was tested by a tube method. In representative 15 isolates based on biofilm-forming ability, bcsA and csgD were screened by conventional polymerase chain reaction, and treated with sub-lethal H2O2. The UPEC were found the most susceptible to meropenem (90.2%), and the least to ampicillin (11.3%) in vitro and 90.1% of them were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Most UPEC harbored biofilm-producing ability (97.2%), and could form pellicle at 37°C. Among representative 15 isolates, csgD was detected only among 10 isolates (66.67%) while bcsA gene was present in 13 isolates (86.67%). This study revealed that level of biofilm production elevated after sub-lethal H2O2 treatment (P = .041). These findings suggested that the pathogens are emerging as MDR. The biofilm production is high and the majority of selected strains contained bcsA and csgD genes. Pellicle formation test was suggestive to be an alternative qualitative method to screen biofilm production in UPEC. The sub-inhibitory concentration of H2O2 may contribute in increasing biofilm formation in UPEC.</description><subject>Ampicillin</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Meropenem</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pellicle</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><issn>1178-6361</issn><issn>1178-6361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtr3TAQhU1poSHJD-hO0E0XcaLXtaRNIQ15QaChadZCluXrCbZ0I8mhl_75yNzQV6gWo-HMOR8SU1UfCD4mRIiTUmTDGkIpIWxFKX9T7S1avYhv_-jfV4cpPeByGCOSsb3q56nP0ELIYNE3lyBl4607Ql8g9DBO6CLEyWQIHhnfobu5ra_9UAI5xC262nYxrJ1Hty6GH9A5dJdhmsddADy6j2Fj8rB4Cv882cFFsAMYZMMIB9W73ozJHb7c-9X9xfn3s6v65uvl9dnpTW2plLxWVsmGK2Uk57xvlTAY94ZiypQ1tmtUvxK9k4SvMOECE7pqhRC2wbS1vMhsv_q8427mdnKddT5HM-pNhMnErQ4G9N8TD4NehyetGiFIIwvg0wsghsfZpawnSNaNo_EuzElTwZTglCpWrB__sT6EOfryveJSVDLS8AVIdi4bQ0rR9b8eQ7BeVqpfrbRkjneZZNbuN_X_gWfwsKGt</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Dawadi, Prabin</creator><creator>Khanal, Santosh</creator><creator>Prasai Joshi, Tista</creator><creator>KC, Sudeep</creator><creator>Tuladhar, Reshma</creator><creator>Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi</creator><creator>Darai, Anjani</creator><creator>Joshi, Dev Raj</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli</title><author>Dawadi, Prabin ; Khanal, Santosh ; Prasai Joshi, Tista ; KC, Sudeep ; Tuladhar, Reshma ; Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi ; Darai, Anjani ; Joshi, Dev Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ampicillin</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Meropenem</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pellicle</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawadi, Prabin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasai Joshi, Tista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KC, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuladhar, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darai, Anjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Dev Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Microbiology insights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawadi, Prabin</au><au>Khanal, Santosh</au><au>Prasai Joshi, Tista</au><au>KC, Sudeep</au><au>Tuladhar, Reshma</au><au>Maharjan, Bijaya Laxmi</au><au>Darai, Anjani</au><au>Joshi, Dev Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology insights</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><spage>117863612211352</spage><epage>11786361221135224</epage><pages>117863612211352-11786361221135224</pages><issn>1178-6361</issn><eissn>1178-6361</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most prevalent cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance could be high among the causative agent. The purpose of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance, biofilm production, and biofilm-associated genes, bcsA and csgD, and sub-inhibitory hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stimulation in UPEC for biofilm formation. A total of 71 UPEC were collected from a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu and subjected to identify antibiotic susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion. The biofilm formation was assessed using microtiter culture plate method while pellicle formation was tested by a tube method. In representative 15 isolates based on biofilm-forming ability, bcsA and csgD were screened by conventional polymerase chain reaction, and treated with sub-lethal H2O2. The UPEC were found the most susceptible to meropenem (90.2%), and the least to ampicillin (11.3%) in vitro and 90.1% of them were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Most UPEC harbored biofilm-producing ability (97.2%), and could form pellicle at 37°C. Among representative 15 isolates, csgD was detected only among 10 isolates (66.67%) while bcsA gene was present in 13 isolates (86.67%). This study revealed that level of biofilm production elevated after sub-lethal H2O2 treatment (P = .041). These findings suggested that the pathogens are emerging as MDR. The biofilm production is high and the majority of selected strains contained bcsA and csgD genes. Pellicle formation test was suggestive to be an alternative qualitative method to screen biofilm production in UPEC. The sub-inhibitory concentration of H2O2 may contribute in increasing biofilm formation in UPEC.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/11786361221135224</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-6361
ispartof Microbiology insights, 2022-01, Vol.15, p.117863612211352-11786361221135224
issn 1178-6361
1178-6361
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9677168
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Ampicillin
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Biofilms
Drug resistance
E coli
Escherichia coli
Genes
Hydrogen peroxide
Meropenem
Multidrug resistance
Original Research
Pellicle
Polymerase chain reaction
Stimulation
Urinary tract
title Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Sub-Inhibitory Hydrogen Peroxide Stimulation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T03%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20Resistance,%20Biofilm%20Formation%20and%20Sub-Inhibitory%20Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20Stimulation%20in%20Uropathogenic%20Escherichia%20coli&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20insights&rft.au=Dawadi,%20Prabin&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=117863612211352&rft.epage=11786361221135224&rft.pages=117863612211352-11786361221135224&rft.issn=1178-6361&rft.eissn=1178-6361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/11786361221135224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2792831648%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-9c986499a8444fb97a00fa20239cacd69f57fe814501470125b777c602bc48143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792831648&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_11786361221135224&rfr_iscdi=true