Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research

The wider public contribute to research funding through taxation but are then unable to view research findings that sit behind paywalls.2 Open access medical journals have the potential to play a key role in informing and empowering patients and carers and educating the public.3 Increased democratis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open respiratory research 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.e001140
Main Authors: Chapman, Stephen J, Doble, Emma, Fulton, Olivia
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8655522
title Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research
format Article
creator Chapman, Stephen J
Doble, Emma
Fulton, Olivia
subjects Asthma
Caregivers
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Editorial
Editorials
Ethics
Funding
Health care policy
Medical research
not applicable
Open access publishing
Patients
Peer review
Respiratory diseases
ispartof BMJ open respiratory research, 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.e001140
description The wider public contribute to research funding through taxation but are then unable to view research findings that sit behind paywalls.2 Open access medical journals have the potential to play a key role in informing and empowering patients and carers and educating the public.3 Increased democratisation of access to medical research findings allows greater transparency and scrutiny, ultimately leading to higher quality, more patient-centered research with greater benefit to society. Patient and public involvement in healthcare policy and publishing is perhaps particularly timely when considering novel models of care delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The BMJ has pioneered work on patient and public partnership in medical publishing, with the launch of a Patient and Public Partnership strategy in 2014,4 the setting up of a patient and public advisory panel, and widespread adoption of patient peer review of submitted manuscripts.2 We plan to adopt The BMJ’s initiative to enhance patient and public involvement at BMJ Open Respiratory Research. [...]we plan to explore the possibility of trialling patient and public review of select manuscripts, following on from The BMJ pioneering work in the area.9 We would be pleased to hear from people who are keen to be involved in peer review, whether they are patients, carers, clinicians or scientists.
language eng
source BMJ Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Scholars Portal Open Access Journals; Coronavirus Research Database
identifier ISSN: 2052-4439
fulltext fulltext
issn 2052-4439
2052-4439
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-05-28T01%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20and%20public%20partnership%20at%20BMJ%20Open%20Respiratory%20Research&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open%20respiratory%20research&rft.au=Chapman,%20Stephen%20J&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e001140&rft.pages=e001140-&rft.issn=2052-4439&rft.eissn=2052-4439&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2608102451%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b423t-7f56011f07ddd75e141f2c35324d18b19592d340d544f1a59bf31f7e0bc9a5813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685428614&rft_id=info:pmid/34876481
container_title BMJ open respiratory research
container_volume 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page e001140
container_end_page
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8655522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608102451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b423t-7f56011f07ddd75e141f2c35324d18b19592d340d544f1a59bf31f7e0bc9a5813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLw0AQhRdRbKn9BYIEfPEldmcvubwoWrxSqYg-L5tk16akSdxNhP57N6TW6oNPO7DfnDkzB6FjwOcANJgkq6VRtvYJJuBjDMDwHhoSzInPGI33d-oBGlu7xA4iUUADdogGlEVhwCIYostn2eSqbDxZZl7dJkWeerU0TamMXeS1Jxvv-unRm9eq9F7cwNzIpjLrrlbSpIsjdKBlYdV4847Q2-3N6_Ten83vHqZXMz9hhDZ-qHngTGocZlkWcgUMNEkpp4RlECUQ85hklOGMM6ZB8jjRFHSocJLGkkdAR-ii13UeVypLnWUjC1GbfCXNWlQyF79_ynwh3qtPEQWcc0KcwNlGwFQfrbKNWOU2VUUhS1W1VpAAR4AJ492s0z_osmpN6dZzVMSZOyMwR9GeSk1lrVF6awaw6DISm4xEl5HoM3JdJ7t7bHu-E3HApAdc98_c_yS_ADLsnH4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><isCDI>true</isCDI><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685428614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Scholars Portal Open Access Journals</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Chapman, Stephen J ; Doble, Emma ; Fulton, Olivia</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Stephen J ; Doble, Emma ; Fulton, Olivia</creatorcontrib><description>The wider public contribute to research funding through taxation but are then unable to view research findings that sit behind paywalls.2 Open access medical journals have the potential to play a key role in informing and empowering patients and carers and educating the public.3 Increased democratisation of access to medical research findings allows greater transparency and scrutiny, ultimately leading to higher quality, more patient-centered research with greater benefit to society. Patient and public involvement in healthcare policy and publishing is perhaps particularly timely when considering novel models of care delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The BMJ has pioneered work on patient and public partnership in medical publishing, with the launch of a Patient and Public Partnership strategy in 2014,4 the setting up of a patient and public advisory panel, and widespread adoption of patient peer review of submitted manuscripts.2 We plan to adopt The BMJ’s initiative to enhance patient and public involvement at BMJ Open Respiratory Research. [...]we plan to explore the possibility of trialling patient and public review of select manuscripts, following on from The BMJ pioneering work in the area.9 We would be pleased to hear from people who are keen to be involved in peer review, whether they are patients, carers, clinicians or scientists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-4439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-4439</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34876481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Asthma ; Caregivers ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Editorial ; Editorials ; Ethics ; Funding ; Health care policy ; Medical research ; not applicable ; Open access publishing ; Patients ; Peer review ; Respiratory diseases</subject><ispartof>BMJ open respiratory research, 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.e001140</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b423t-7f56011f07ddd75e141f2c35324d18b19592d340d544f1a59bf31f7e0bc9a5813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7580-9400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2685428614/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2685428614?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,734,787,791,892,2237,24362,25799,27985,27986,37077,37078,38581,44099,44955,54176,54178,56054,75240,76120</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doble, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Olivia</creatorcontrib><title>Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research</title><title>BMJ open respiratory research</title><addtitle>BMJ Open Resp Res</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open Respir Res</addtitle><description>The wider public contribute to research funding through taxation but are then unable to view research findings that sit behind paywalls.2 Open access medical journals have the potential to play a key role in informing and empowering patients and carers and educating the public.3 Increased democratisation of access to medical research findings allows greater transparency and scrutiny, ultimately leading to higher quality, more patient-centered research with greater benefit to society. Patient and public involvement in healthcare policy and publishing is perhaps particularly timely when considering novel models of care delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The BMJ has pioneered work on patient and public partnership in medical publishing, with the launch of a Patient and Public Partnership strategy in 2014,4 the setting up of a patient and public advisory panel, and widespread adoption of patient peer review of submitted manuscripts.2 We plan to adopt The BMJ’s initiative to enhance patient and public involvement at BMJ Open Respiratory Research. [...]we plan to explore the possibility of trialling patient and public review of select manuscripts, following on from The BMJ pioneering work in the area.9 We would be pleased to hear from people who are keen to be involved in peer review, whether they are patients, carers, clinicians or scientists.</description><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Editorial</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>not applicable</subject><subject>Open access publishing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><issn>2052-4439</issn><issn>2052-4439</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLw0AQhRdRbKn9BYIEfPEldmcvubwoWrxSqYg-L5tk16akSdxNhP57N6TW6oNPO7DfnDkzB6FjwOcANJgkq6VRtvYJJuBjDMDwHhoSzInPGI33d-oBGlu7xA4iUUADdogGlEVhwCIYostn2eSqbDxZZl7dJkWeerU0TamMXeS1Jxvv-unRm9eq9F7cwNzIpjLrrlbSpIsjdKBlYdV4847Q2-3N6_Ten83vHqZXMz9hhDZ-qHngTGocZlkWcgUMNEkpp4RlECUQ85hklOGMM6ZB8jjRFHSocJLGkkdAR-ii13UeVypLnWUjC1GbfCXNWlQyF79_ynwh3qtPEQWcc0KcwNlGwFQfrbKNWOU2VUUhS1W1VpAAR4AJ492s0z_osmpN6dZzVMSZOyMwR9GeSk1lrVF6awaw6DISm4xEl5HoM3JdJ7t7bHu-E3HApAdc98_c_yS_ADLsnH4</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Chapman, Stephen J</creator><creator>Doble, Emma</creator><creator>Fulton, Olivia</creator><general>British Thoracic Society</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-9400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research</title><author>Chapman, Stephen J ; Doble, Emma ; Fulton, Olivia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b423t-7f56011f07ddd75e141f2c35324d18b19592d340d544f1a59bf31f7e0bc9a5813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Editorial</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>not applicable</topic><topic>Open access publishing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doble, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Olivia</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open respiratory research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapman, Stephen J</au><au>Doble, Emma</au><au>Fulton, Olivia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient and public partnership at BMJ Open Respiratory Research</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open respiratory research</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open Resp Res</stitle><addtitle>BMJ Open Respir Res</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e001140</spage><pages>e001140-</pages><issn>2052-4439</issn><eissn>2052-4439</eissn><notes>SourceType-Other Sources-1</notes><notes>content type line 63</notes><notes>ObjectType-Editorial-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Commentary-1</notes><abstract>The wider public contribute to research funding through taxation but are then unable to view research findings that sit behind paywalls.2 Open access medical journals have the potential to play a key role in informing and empowering patients and carers and educating the public.3 Increased democratisation of access to medical research findings allows greater transparency and scrutiny, ultimately leading to higher quality, more patient-centered research with greater benefit to society. Patient and public involvement in healthcare policy and publishing is perhaps particularly timely when considering novel models of care delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The BMJ has pioneered work on patient and public partnership in medical publishing, with the launch of a Patient and Public Partnership strategy in 2014,4 the setting up of a patient and public advisory panel, and widespread adoption of patient peer review of submitted manuscripts.2 We plan to adopt The BMJ’s initiative to enhance patient and public involvement at BMJ Open Respiratory Research. [...]we plan to explore the possibility of trialling patient and public review of select manuscripts, following on from The BMJ pioneering work in the area.9 We would be pleased to hear from people who are keen to be involved in peer review, whether they are patients, carers, clinicians or scientists.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>34876481</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001140</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-9400</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>