Loading…

Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient's body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, espec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical imaging science 2020-09, Vol.10, p.58-58, Article 58
Main Authors: Tantawy, Hazem M, Abdelhafez, Yasser G, Helal, Nadia L, Saad, Ibrahim E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b9985db96a9bf70aeaa1babebc48d29de4e3a84fa1cacf86712b9b90a102861c3
container_end_page 58
container_issue
container_start_page 58
container_title Journal of clinical imaging science
container_volume 10
creator Tantawy, Hazem M
Abdelhafez, Yasser G
Helal, Nadia L
Saad, Ibrahim E
description Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient's body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, especially in myocardial perfusion imaging. An important parameter for image quality in SPECT is image contrast which is defined as the difference in density between regions of the image corresponding to different levels of radioactive uptake in the patient. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of applying different correction methods on image contrast of myocardial SPECT/CT images. A total of 114 patients, 43 females and 71 males, patient's raw data were processed and analyzed using attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), both attenuation and scatter correction together (ACSC), and no correction (NC). The short axis (coronal) slices resulted from the raw data reconstruction were chosen to perform the processing for hot and cold spheres for contrast values measurement. Statistical analysis was made for the measured contrast values for AC, SC, ACSC, and NC to determine the best image contrast. When applying SC alone, it yields better contrast value (0.834), compared to AC (0.677) and ACSC (0.739). Both ACSC and AC had better image contrast compared to NC (0.592). The intercomparison study between the correction conditions indicates that the counts in SPECT/ CT are highly affected by all correction methods. The image contrast has been significantly improved by using SC, AC, and ACSC when compared with the NC image. Furthermore, SC is superior in the image contrast than the other correction conditions in the reconstruction of SPECT/CT MPI.
doi_str_mv 10.25259/JCIS_123_2020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7533088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449181188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b9985db96a9bf70aeaa1babebc48d29de4e3a84fa1cacf86712b9b90a102861c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhSMEolXplSPykUta27GT-IKEQqGLWoG0pVdr7NgboyQOtgPKv-pPbLpdKirhy1iez29G72XZW4LPKKdcnH9tNltJaCEppvhFdkwJL3PORfXycK84YUfZaYw_8XqYYCXmr7OjosCUlaQ4zu5uIThIzo_IW9T4MQWICd1CP5uIrA_oevEaQuugR99NsHN8YDcD7Ny4Q25E27X2Jp86n9bGxeDinmj8MM3JtOjGD34XYOqW8_-8octFBdei7RKTGSL641KHPjlrTTBjWlVCMHq_3rVJnW_jm-yVhT6a00M9yX58vrhpLvOrb182zcerXBeMp1wJUfNWiRKEshUGA0AUKKM0q1sqWsNMATWzQDRoW5cVoUoogYFgWpdEFyfZh0fdaVaDabV5cKaXU3ADhEV6cPJ5Z3Sd3PnfsuKru3W9Crw_CAT_azUzydUabfoeRuPnKCljgtSE7NGzR1QHH2Mw9mkMwXKftHyW9Prh3b_LPeF_cy3uAT9Kq0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449181188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Tantawy, Hazem M ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Helal, Nadia L ; Saad, Ibrahim E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tantawy, Hazem M ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Helal, Nadia L ; Saad, Ibrahim E</creatorcontrib><description>Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient's body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, especially in myocardial perfusion imaging. An important parameter for image quality in SPECT is image contrast which is defined as the difference in density between regions of the image corresponding to different levels of radioactive uptake in the patient. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of applying different correction methods on image contrast of myocardial SPECT/CT images. A total of 114 patients, 43 females and 71 males, patient's raw data were processed and analyzed using attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), both attenuation and scatter correction together (ACSC), and no correction (NC). The short axis (coronal) slices resulted from the raw data reconstruction were chosen to perform the processing for hot and cold spheres for contrast values measurement. Statistical analysis was made for the measured contrast values for AC, SC, ACSC, and NC to determine the best image contrast. When applying SC alone, it yields better contrast value (0.834), compared to AC (0.677) and ACSC (0.739). Both ACSC and AC had better image contrast compared to NC (0.592). The intercomparison study between the correction conditions indicates that the counts in SPECT/ CT are highly affected by all correction methods. The image contrast has been significantly improved by using SC, AC, and ACSC when compared with the NC image. Furthermore, SC is superior in the image contrast than the other correction conditions in the reconstruction of SPECT/CT MPI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_123_2020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33024613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Scientific Scholar</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical imaging science, 2020-09, Vol.10, p.58-58, Article 58</ispartof><rights>2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.</rights><rights>2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2020 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b9985db96a9bf70aeaa1babebc48d29de4e3a84fa1cacf86712b9b90a102861c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5478-4600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533088/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533088/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,27957,27958,53827,53829</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tantawy, Hazem M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helal, Nadia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Ibrahim E</creatorcontrib><title>Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods</title><title>Journal of clinical imaging science</title><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><description>Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient's body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, especially in myocardial perfusion imaging. An important parameter for image quality in SPECT is image contrast which is defined as the difference in density between regions of the image corresponding to different levels of radioactive uptake in the patient. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of applying different correction methods on image contrast of myocardial SPECT/CT images. A total of 114 patients, 43 females and 71 males, patient's raw data were processed and analyzed using attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), both attenuation and scatter correction together (ACSC), and no correction (NC). The short axis (coronal) slices resulted from the raw data reconstruction were chosen to perform the processing for hot and cold spheres for contrast values measurement. Statistical analysis was made for the measured contrast values for AC, SC, ACSC, and NC to determine the best image contrast. When applying SC alone, it yields better contrast value (0.834), compared to AC (0.677) and ACSC (0.739). Both ACSC and AC had better image contrast compared to NC (0.592). The intercomparison study between the correction conditions indicates that the counts in SPECT/ CT are highly affected by all correction methods. The image contrast has been significantly improved by using SC, AC, and ACSC when compared with the NC image. Furthermore, SC is superior in the image contrast than the other correction conditions in the reconstruction of SPECT/CT MPI.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>2156-7514</issn><issn>2156-5597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhSMEolXplSPykUta27GT-IKEQqGLWoG0pVdr7NgboyQOtgPKv-pPbLpdKirhy1iez29G72XZW4LPKKdcnH9tNltJaCEppvhFdkwJL3PORfXycK84YUfZaYw_8XqYYCXmr7OjosCUlaQ4zu5uIThIzo_IW9T4MQWICd1CP5uIrA_oevEaQuugR99NsHN8YDcD7Ny4Q25E27X2Jp86n9bGxeDinmj8MM3JtOjGD34XYOqW8_-8octFBdei7RKTGSL641KHPjlrTTBjWlVCMHq_3rVJnW_jm-yVhT6a00M9yX58vrhpLvOrb182zcerXBeMp1wJUfNWiRKEshUGA0AUKKM0q1sqWsNMATWzQDRoW5cVoUoogYFgWpdEFyfZh0fdaVaDabV5cKaXU3ADhEV6cPJ5Z3Sd3PnfsuKru3W9Crw_CAT_azUzydUabfoeRuPnKCljgtSE7NGzR1QHH2Mw9mkMwXKftHyW9Prh3b_LPeF_cy3uAT9Kq0E</recordid><startdate>20200925</startdate><enddate>20200925</enddate><creator>Tantawy, Hazem M</creator><creator>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creator><creator>Helal, Nadia L</creator><creator>Saad, Ibrahim E</creator><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-4600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200925</creationdate><title>Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods</title><author>Tantawy, Hazem M ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G ; Helal, Nadia L ; Saad, Ibrahim E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b9985db96a9bf70aeaa1babebc48d29de4e3a84fa1cacf86712b9b90a102861c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tantawy, Hazem M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helal, Nadia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Ibrahim E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tantawy, Hazem M</au><au>Abdelhafez, Yasser G</au><au>Helal, Nadia L</au><au>Saad, Ibrahim E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><date>2020-09-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>58</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>58-58</pages><artnum>58</artnum><issn>2156-7514</issn><eissn>2156-5597</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient's body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, especially in myocardial perfusion imaging. An important parameter for image quality in SPECT is image contrast which is defined as the difference in density between regions of the image corresponding to different levels of radioactive uptake in the patient. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of applying different correction methods on image contrast of myocardial SPECT/CT images. A total of 114 patients, 43 females and 71 males, patient's raw data were processed and analyzed using attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), both attenuation and scatter correction together (ACSC), and no correction (NC). The short axis (coronal) slices resulted from the raw data reconstruction were chosen to perform the processing for hot and cold spheres for contrast values measurement. Statistical analysis was made for the measured contrast values for AC, SC, ACSC, and NC to determine the best image contrast. When applying SC alone, it yields better contrast value (0.834), compared to AC (0.677) and ACSC (0.739). Both ACSC and AC had better image contrast compared to NC (0.592). The intercomparison study between the correction conditions indicates that the counts in SPECT/ CT are highly affected by all correction methods. The image contrast has been significantly improved by using SC, AC, and ACSC when compared with the NC image. Furthermore, SC is superior in the image contrast than the other correction conditions in the reconstruction of SPECT/CT MPI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Scientific Scholar</pub><pmid>33024613</pmid><doi>10.25259/JCIS_123_2020</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-4600</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-7514
ispartof Journal of clinical imaging science, 2020-09, Vol.10, p.58-58, Article 58
issn 2156-7514
2156-5597
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7533088
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects Original Research
title Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A21%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20of%20Contrast%20Values%20for%20Myocardial%20Perfusion%20Imaging%20in%20Single-photon%20Emission%20Computed%20Tomography/Computed%20Tomography%20Hybrid%20Systems%20with%20Different%20Correction%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20imaging%20science&rft.au=Tantawy,%20Hazem%20M&rft.date=2020-09-25&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=58-58&rft.artnum=58&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259/JCIS_123_2020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2449181188%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b9985db96a9bf70aeaa1babebc48d29de4e3a84fa1cacf86712b9b90a102861c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449181188&rft_id=info:pmid/33024613&rfr_iscdi=true