Loading…
Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study
Abstract Objectives Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elde...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geriatric oncology 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.437-443 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63 |
container_end_page | 443 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | Journal of geriatric oncology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Lowenstein, Lisa M Mohile, Supriya G Gil, Heather Hopkins Pandya, Chintan Hemmerich, Joshua Rodin, Miriam Dale, William |
description | Abstract Objectives Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls. Materials and Methods Men aged ≥ 65 years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. Results and Conclusions The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9 years and 76.1 years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 4.46, p < 0.01; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 3.77, p < 0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 1.14, p = 0.59; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 1.06, p = 0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5159296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S187940681630100X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826739606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQXSEQrUp_ABfkYyqRYO-Hdy2kVlUUClIlkAKFm-V4Z7MOu3awvZHyl_iVnSUhAg74YmvmzZvxe5MkLxmdMcr4m81ss3azFJ8zWs4oY0-Sc1aVYprTkj89vXl1llyGsKF4slSIkj9PztIyr2gpsvPk59fW6JasIEbwZOuhNjoG0jsfVWfinqje2TVxXY3pHuxrohDlQlQRiFZWY3jyaa6uSG3U2rpgAnGe7IbOglcr84vDWRJbIA_HYAdkMfIFshz8DvZk8rBYTll2dUNuiYeI9FvQ0eywg2txEhLiUO9fJM8a1QW4PN4XyZd3i8_z99P7j3cf5rf3U11QHqdcNUVd0EqIooFMKcEpCJ1TJjLgTa7KRjCaCp5XIm0aWtQAgoq00s0K9QGeXSTXB97tsOqh1mCjV53cetMrv5dOGfl3xppWrt1OFqwQSIwEkyOBdz8GCFH2JmjoOmXBDUGyKuVlhnONUHaAavx08NCc2jAqR5vlRqLNcrRZ0lKizVjz6s_5ThW_TUXA2wMAUKWdAS-DNoBW1cajrrJ25r_01_9U685Yo1X3HfYQNm7wFuWXTIZUUrkc92xcM8Yzyij9lj0CXlbQJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826739606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Lowenstein, Lisa M ; Mohile, Supriya G ; Gil, Heather Hopkins ; Pandya, Chintan ; Hemmerich, Joshua ; Rodin, Miriam ; Dale, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Lisa M ; Mohile, Supriya G ; Gil, Heather Hopkins ; Pandya, Chintan ; Hemmerich, Joshua ; Rodin, Miriam ; Dale, William</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls. Materials and Methods Men aged ≥ 65 years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. Results and Conclusions The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9 years and 76.1 years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 4.46, p < 0.01; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 3.77, p < 0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 1.14, p = 0.59; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 1.06, p = 0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1879-4068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-4076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27480793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Case-Control Studies ; Frail Elderly - statistics & numerical data ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health Status ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Mortality ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vulnerability ; Vulnerable Populations - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of geriatric oncology, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.437-443</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27480793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohile, Supriya G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Heather Hopkins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Chintan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmerich, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodin, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, William</creatorcontrib><title>Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study</title><title>Journal of geriatric oncology</title><addtitle>J Geriatr Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls. Materials and Methods Men aged ≥ 65 years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. Results and Conclusions The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9 years and 76.1 years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 4.46, p < 0.01; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 3.77, p < 0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 1.14, p = 0.59; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 1.06, p = 0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Frail Elderly - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Vulnerable Populations - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1879-4068</issn><issn>1879-4076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQXSEQrUp_ABfkYyqRYO-Hdy2kVlUUClIlkAKFm-V4Z7MOu3awvZHyl_iVnSUhAg74YmvmzZvxe5MkLxmdMcr4m81ss3azFJ8zWs4oY0-Sc1aVYprTkj89vXl1llyGsKF4slSIkj9PztIyr2gpsvPk59fW6JasIEbwZOuhNjoG0jsfVWfinqje2TVxXY3pHuxrohDlQlQRiFZWY3jyaa6uSG3U2rpgAnGe7IbOglcr84vDWRJbIA_HYAdkMfIFshz8DvZk8rBYTll2dUNuiYeI9FvQ0eywg2txEhLiUO9fJM8a1QW4PN4XyZd3i8_z99P7j3cf5rf3U11QHqdcNUVd0EqIooFMKcEpCJ1TJjLgTa7KRjCaCp5XIm0aWtQAgoq00s0K9QGeXSTXB97tsOqh1mCjV53cetMrv5dOGfl3xppWrt1OFqwQSIwEkyOBdz8GCFH2JmjoOmXBDUGyKuVlhnONUHaAavx08NCc2jAqR5vlRqLNcrRZ0lKizVjz6s_5ThW_TUXA2wMAUKWdAS-DNoBW1cajrrJ25r_01_9U685Yo1X3HfYQNm7wFuWXTIZUUrkc92xcM8Yzyij9lj0CXlbQJw</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Lowenstein, Lisa M</creator><creator>Mohile, Supriya G</creator><creator>Gil, Heather Hopkins</creator><creator>Pandya, Chintan</creator><creator>Hemmerich, Joshua</creator><creator>Rodin, Miriam</creator><creator>Dale, William</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study</title><author>Lowenstein, Lisa M ; Mohile, Supriya G ; Gil, Heather Hopkins ; Pandya, Chintan ; Hemmerich, Joshua ; Rodin, Miriam ; Dale, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Frail Elderly - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Vulnerable Populations - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohile, Supriya G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Heather Hopkins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Chintan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmerich, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodin, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geriatric oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowenstein, Lisa M</au><au>Mohile, Supriya G</au><au>Gil, Heather Hopkins</au><au>Pandya, Chintan</au><au>Hemmerich, Joshua</au><au>Rodin, Miriam</au><au>Dale, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geriatric oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Geriatr Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>437-443</pages><issn>1879-4068</issn><eissn>1879-4076</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Passed away</notes><notes>Present Address: Department of Health Services Research, Division of OVP, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, lmlowenstein@mdanderson.org</notes><abstract>Abstract Objectives Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls. Materials and Methods Men aged ≥ 65 years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. Results and Conclusions The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9 years and 76.1 years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 4.46, p < 0.01; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 3.77, p < 0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13 ≥ 3: HR = 1.14, p = 0.59; VES13 ≥ 6: HR = 1.06, p = 0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27480793</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1879-4068 |
ispartof | Journal of geriatric oncology, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.437-443 |
issn | 1879-4068 1879-4076 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5159296 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Aged Analysis of Variance Case-Control Studies Frail Elderly - statistics & numerical data Geriatric Assessment - methods Health Status Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Internal Medicine Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Mortality Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality Retrospective Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations - statistics & numerical data |
title | Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T07%3A52%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20better%20predicts%20mortality%20among%20older%20men,%20a%20prostate%20cancer%20(PCa)%20diagnosis%20or%20vulnerability%20on%20the%20Vulnerable%20Elders%20Survey%20(VES-13)?%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geriatric%20oncology&rft.au=Lowenstein,%20Lisa%20M&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=437-443&rft.issn=1879-4068&rft.eissn=1879-4076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826739606%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-6af5d508995fe3aa960e9c40193e6f4a7f9102964892ff05dee90928cfb329e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826739606&rft_id=info:pmid/27480793&rfr_iscdi=true |