How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?

Nanotechnology is of increasing significance. Curation of nanomaterial data into electronic databases offers opportunities to better understand and predict nanomaterials' behaviour. This supports innovation in, and regulation of, nanotechnology. It is commonly understood that curated data need...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nanoscale 2016-05, Vol.8 (19), p.9919-9943
Main Authors: Marchese Robinson, Richard L, Lynch, Iseult, Peijnenburg, Willie, Rumble, John, Klaessig, Fred, Marquardt, Clarissa, Rauscher, Hubert, Puzyn, Tomasz, Purian, Ronit, Åberg, Christoffer, Karcher, Sandra, Vriens, Hanne, Hoet, Peter, Hoover, Mark D, Hendren, Christine Ogilvie, Harper, Stacey L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assessments
Completeness
Control
Electronics
Literature reviews
Multidisciplinary
Nanostructure
Nanotechnology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243
container_end_page 9943
container_issue 19
container_start_page 9919
container_title Nanoscale
container_volume 8
creator Marchese Robinson, Richard L
Lynch, Iseult
Peijnenburg, Willie
Rumble, John
Klaessig, Fred
Marquardt, Clarissa
Rauscher, Hubert
Puzyn, Tomasz
Purian, Ronit
Åberg, Christoffer
Karcher, Sandra
Vriens, Hanne
Hoet, Peter
Hoover, Mark D
Hendren, Christine Ogilvie
Harper, Stacey L
description Nanotechnology is of increasing significance. Curation of nanomaterial data into electronic databases offers opportunities to better understand and predict nanomaterials' behaviour. This supports innovation in, and regulation of, nanotechnology. It is commonly understood that curated data need to be sufficiently complete and of sufficient quality to serve their intended purpose. However, assessing data completeness and quality is non-trivial in general and is arguably especially difficult in the nanoscience area, given its highly multidisciplinary nature. The current article, part of the Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative series, addresses how to assess the completeness and quality of (curated) nanomaterial data. In order to address this key challenge, a variety of related issues are discussed: the meaning and importance of data completeness and quality, existing approaches to their assessment and the key challenges associated with evaluating the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data. Considerations which are specific to the nanoscience area and lessons which can be learned from other relevant scientific disciplines are considered. Hence, the scope of this discussion ranges from physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterials and interference of nanomaterials with nanotoxicology assays to broader issues such as minimum information checklists, toxicology data quality schemes and computational approaches that facilitate evaluation of the completeness and quality of (curated) data. This discussion is informed by a literature review and a survey of key nanomaterial data curation stakeholders. Finally, drawing upon this discussion, recommendations are presented concerning the central question: how should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c5nr08944a
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4899944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1789033775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMo7hd_gOQowmi2znJRhsENRGHQc8ikq52WdGdMuhX_va2Og9481YP6eFS9h9ABJSeUcHPqizYRbYRwa2ibEUFGnCu2vtJSbKGdnJ8JkYZLvom2mKKCE6a30fQ6vuE8j30ocTcH7GOzCNBBCzlj15b4pXeh7t5xrLDvk-ugxK1rYzOoVLuAS9c5PAMMry70n-vzPbRRuZBhfzl30ePlxcPkenR7f3UzGd-OvChMN2JQKe8Y1xWRikoA5iWYGUgpFQMiuHKVp5TPtBeSMMYLqjSRjAqmpWeC76Kzb99FP2ug9NB2yQW7SHXj0ruNrrZ_N209t0_x1QptzJDWYHC0NEjxpYfc2abOHkJwLcQ-W6pZURBDzD9QpQ0ZUlfFgB5_oz7FnBNUq4sosZ992UlxN_3qazzAh79_WKE_BfEP1buQYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789033775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)</source><creator>Marchese Robinson, Richard L ; Lynch, Iseult ; Peijnenburg, Willie ; Rumble, John ; Klaessig, Fred ; Marquardt, Clarissa ; Rauscher, Hubert ; Puzyn, Tomasz ; Purian, Ronit ; Åberg, Christoffer ; Karcher, Sandra ; Vriens, Hanne ; Hoet, Peter ; Hoover, Mark D ; Hendren, Christine Ogilvie ; Harper, Stacey L</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchese Robinson, Richard L ; Lynch, Iseult ; Peijnenburg, Willie ; Rumble, John ; Klaessig, Fred ; Marquardt, Clarissa ; Rauscher, Hubert ; Puzyn, Tomasz ; Purian, Ronit ; Åberg, Christoffer ; Karcher, Sandra ; Vriens, Hanne ; Hoet, Peter ; Hoover, Mark D ; Hendren, Christine Ogilvie ; Harper, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><description>Nanotechnology is of increasing significance. Curation of nanomaterial data into electronic databases offers opportunities to better understand and predict nanomaterials' behaviour. This supports innovation in, and regulation of, nanotechnology. It is commonly understood that curated data need to be sufficiently complete and of sufficient quality to serve their intended purpose. However, assessing data completeness and quality is non-trivial in general and is arguably especially difficult in the nanoscience area, given its highly multidisciplinary nature. The current article, part of the Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative series, addresses how to assess the completeness and quality of (curated) nanomaterial data. In order to address this key challenge, a variety of related issues are discussed: the meaning and importance of data completeness and quality, existing approaches to their assessment and the key challenges associated with evaluating the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data. Considerations which are specific to the nanoscience area and lessons which can be learned from other relevant scientific disciplines are considered. Hence, the scope of this discussion ranges from physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterials and interference of nanomaterials with nanotoxicology assays to broader issues such as minimum information checklists, toxicology data quality schemes and computational approaches that facilitate evaluation of the completeness and quality of (curated) data. This discussion is informed by a literature review and a survey of key nanomaterial data curation stakeholders. Finally, drawing upon this discussion, recommendations are presented concerning the central question: how should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-3364</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2040-3372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-3372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c5nr08944a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27143028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Completeness ; Control ; Electronics ; Literature reviews ; Multidisciplinary ; Nanostructure ; Nanotechnology</subject><ispartof>Nanoscale, 2016-05, Vol.8 (19), p.9919-9943</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6886-7239 ; 0000-0003-4250-4584</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchese Robinson, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Iseult</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peijnenburg, Willie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaessig, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquardt, Clarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzyn, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purian, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åberg, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoet, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendren, Christine Ogilvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><title>How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</title><title>Nanoscale</title><addtitle>Nanoscale</addtitle><description>Nanotechnology is of increasing significance. Curation of nanomaterial data into electronic databases offers opportunities to better understand and predict nanomaterials' behaviour. This supports innovation in, and regulation of, nanotechnology. It is commonly understood that curated data need to be sufficiently complete and of sufficient quality to serve their intended purpose. However, assessing data completeness and quality is non-trivial in general and is arguably especially difficult in the nanoscience area, given its highly multidisciplinary nature. The current article, part of the Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative series, addresses how to assess the completeness and quality of (curated) nanomaterial data. In order to address this key challenge, a variety of related issues are discussed: the meaning and importance of data completeness and quality, existing approaches to their assessment and the key challenges associated with evaluating the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data. Considerations which are specific to the nanoscience area and lessons which can be learned from other relevant scientific disciplines are considered. Hence, the scope of this discussion ranges from physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterials and interference of nanomaterials with nanotoxicology assays to broader issues such as minimum information checklists, toxicology data quality schemes and computational approaches that facilitate evaluation of the completeness and quality of (curated) data. This discussion is informed by a literature review and a survey of key nanomaterial data curation stakeholders. Finally, drawing upon this discussion, recommendations are presented concerning the central question: how should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Completeness</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><issn>2040-3364</issn><issn>2040-3372</issn><issn>2040-3372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMo7hd_gOQowmi2znJRhsENRGHQc8ikq52WdGdMuhX_va2Og9481YP6eFS9h9ABJSeUcHPqizYRbYRwa2ibEUFGnCu2vtJSbKGdnJ8JkYZLvom2mKKCE6a30fQ6vuE8j30ocTcH7GOzCNBBCzlj15b4pXeh7t5xrLDvk-ugxK1rYzOoVLuAS9c5PAMMry70n-vzPbRRuZBhfzl30ePlxcPkenR7f3UzGd-OvChMN2JQKe8Y1xWRikoA5iWYGUgpFQMiuHKVp5TPtBeSMMYLqjSRjAqmpWeC76Kzb99FP2ug9NB2yQW7SHXj0ruNrrZ_N209t0_x1QptzJDWYHC0NEjxpYfc2abOHkJwLcQ-W6pZURBDzD9QpQ0ZUlfFgB5_oz7FnBNUq4sosZ992UlxN_3qazzAh79_WKE_BfEP1buQYg</recordid><startdate>20160521</startdate><enddate>20160521</enddate><creator>Marchese Robinson, Richard L</creator><creator>Lynch, Iseult</creator><creator>Peijnenburg, Willie</creator><creator>Rumble, John</creator><creator>Klaessig, Fred</creator><creator>Marquardt, Clarissa</creator><creator>Rauscher, Hubert</creator><creator>Puzyn, Tomasz</creator><creator>Purian, Ronit</creator><creator>Åberg, Christoffer</creator><creator>Karcher, Sandra</creator><creator>Vriens, Hanne</creator><creator>Hoet, Peter</creator><creator>Hoover, Mark D</creator><creator>Hendren, Christine Ogilvie</creator><creator>Harper, Stacey L</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-7239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-4584</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160521</creationdate><title>How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</title><author>Marchese Robinson, Richard L ; Lynch, Iseult ; Peijnenburg, Willie ; Rumble, John ; Klaessig, Fred ; Marquardt, Clarissa ; Rauscher, Hubert ; Puzyn, Tomasz ; Purian, Ronit ; Åberg, Christoffer ; Karcher, Sandra ; Vriens, Hanne ; Hoet, Peter ; Hoover, Mark D ; Hendren, Christine Ogilvie ; Harper, Stacey L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Completeness</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchese Robinson, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Iseult</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peijnenburg, Willie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaessig, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquardt, Clarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzyn, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purian, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åberg, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoet, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendren, Christine Ogilvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nanoscale</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchese Robinson, Richard L</au><au>Lynch, Iseult</au><au>Peijnenburg, Willie</au><au>Rumble, John</au><au>Klaessig, Fred</au><au>Marquardt, Clarissa</au><au>Rauscher, Hubert</au><au>Puzyn, Tomasz</au><au>Purian, Ronit</au><au>Åberg, Christoffer</au><au>Karcher, Sandra</au><au>Vriens, Hanne</au><au>Hoet, Peter</au><au>Hoover, Mark D</au><au>Hendren, Christine Ogilvie</au><au>Harper, Stacey L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</atitle><jtitle>Nanoscale</jtitle><addtitle>Nanoscale</addtitle><date>2016-05-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>9919</spage><epage>9943</epage><pages>9919-9943</pages><issn>2040-3364</issn><issn>2040-3372</issn><eissn>2040-3372</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Nanotechnology is of increasing significance. Curation of nanomaterial data into electronic databases offers opportunities to better understand and predict nanomaterials' behaviour. This supports innovation in, and regulation of, nanotechnology. It is commonly understood that curated data need to be sufficiently complete and of sufficient quality to serve their intended purpose. However, assessing data completeness and quality is non-trivial in general and is arguably especially difficult in the nanoscience area, given its highly multidisciplinary nature. The current article, part of the Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative series, addresses how to assess the completeness and quality of (curated) nanomaterial data. In order to address this key challenge, a variety of related issues are discussed: the meaning and importance of data completeness and quality, existing approaches to their assessment and the key challenges associated with evaluating the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data. Considerations which are specific to the nanoscience area and lessons which can be learned from other relevant scientific disciplines are considered. Hence, the scope of this discussion ranges from physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterials and interference of nanomaterials with nanotoxicology assays to broader issues such as minimum information checklists, toxicology data quality schemes and computational approaches that facilitate evaluation of the completeness and quality of (curated) data. This discussion is informed by a literature review and a survey of key nanomaterial data curation stakeholders. Finally, drawing upon this discussion, recommendations are presented concerning the central question: how should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>27143028</pmid><doi>10.1039/c5nr08944a</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-7239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-4584</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-3364
ispartof Nanoscale, 2016-05, Vol.8 (19), p.9919-9943
issn 2040-3364
2040-3372
2040-3372
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4899944
source Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)
subjects Assessments
Completeness
Control
Electronics
Literature reviews
Multidisciplinary
Nanostructure
Nanotechnology
title How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T02%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20should%20the%20completeness%20and%20quality%20of%20curated%20nanomaterial%20data%20be%20evaluated?&rft.jtitle=Nanoscale&rft.au=Marchese%20Robinson,%20Richard%20L&rft.date=2016-05-21&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=9919&rft.epage=9943&rft.pages=9919-9943&rft.issn=2040-3364&rft.eissn=2040-3372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c5nr08944a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1789033775%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2ef7ca238f06716ee2c6e9be66672e0437afc113b8c460223517806214286c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789033775&rft_id=info:pmid/27143028&rfr_iscdi=true