Loading…

Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI

Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) cal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomedical engineering online 2015-11, Vol.14 (1), p.110-110, Article 110
Main Authors: Rispoli, Vinicius C, Nielsen, Jon F, Nayak, Krishna S, Carvalho, Joao L A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3
container_end_page 110
container_issue 1
container_start_page 110
container_title Biomedical engineering online
container_volume 14
creator Rispoli, Vinicius C
Nielsen, Jon F
Nayak, Krishna S
Carvalho, Joao L A
description Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. CFD provides arbitrarily high resolution, but its accuracy hinges on model assumptions, while velocity fields measured with PC-MRI generally do not satisfy the equations of fluid dynamics, provide limited resolution, and suffer from partial volume effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a proof-of-concept numerical procedure for constructing a simulated flow field that is influenced by both direct PC-MRI measurements and a fluid physics model, thereby taking advantage of both the accuracy of PC-MRI and the high spatial resolution of CFD. The use of the proposed approach in regularizing 3D flow fields is evaluated. The proposed algorithm incorporates both a Newtonian fluid physics model and a linear PC-MRI signal model. The model equations are solved numerically using a modified CFD algorithm. The numerical solution corresponds to the optimal solution of a generalized Tikhonov regularization, which provides a flow field that satisfies the flow physics equations, while being close enough to the measured PC-MRI velocity profile. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated on data from the carotid bifurcation of one healthy volunteer, and also from a pulsatile carotid flow phantom. The proposed solver produces flow fields that are in better agreement with direct PC-MRI measurements than CFD alone, and converges faster, while closely satisfying the fluid dynamics equations. For the implementation that provided the best results, the signal-to-error ratio (with respect to the PC-MRI measurements) in the phantom experiment was 6.56 dB higher than that of conventional CFD; in the in vivo experiment, it was 2.15 dB higher. The proposed approach allows partial or complete measurements to be incorporated into a modified CFD solver, for improving the accuracy of the resulting flow fields estimates. This can be used for reducing scan time, increasing the spatial resolution, and/or denoising the PC-MRI measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12938-015-0104-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4661988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1738483874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBsJeONNNWnaJr0RZH4NJoIoCF6ENB-a0TYzaZX5683clOlFSDjvc15OzgvAAUYnGLPiNOC0JCxBOI8HZQndADs4o3lSpvnT5tp7AHZDmCKUIlSU22CQFgWOItoBzyPXzPpOdNa1ooam7q2Cat6KxsoAg236-lsL0BlY1c6pyLgP6PVLVLz91ApWc0gu4OxVBA2lazsvQgdv78d7YMuIOuj91T0Ej1eXD6ObZHJ3PR6dTxKZpbRLcqUqWpSyYmVVFYZKRnCeC0pFgQ0yqUZplSvKYg0pahBBUhkiBCsQMYxIMgRnS99ZXzVaSb0YoeYzbxvh59wJy_8qrX3lL-6dZ3ENJWPR4Hhl4N1br0PHGxukrmvRatcHjilhGSOMZhE9-odOXe_j6hYULaMfyvJI4SUlvQvBa_M7DEZ8ER1fRsdjdHwRHaex53D9F78dP1mRL1Jylgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779619045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rispoli, Vinicius C ; Nielsen, Jon F ; Nayak, Krishna S ; Carvalho, Joao L A</creator><creatorcontrib>Rispoli, Vinicius C ; Nielsen, Jon F ; Nayak, Krishna S ; Carvalho, Joao L A</creatorcontrib><description>Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. CFD provides arbitrarily high resolution, but its accuracy hinges on model assumptions, while velocity fields measured with PC-MRI generally do not satisfy the equations of fluid dynamics, provide limited resolution, and suffer from partial volume effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a proof-of-concept numerical procedure for constructing a simulated flow field that is influenced by both direct PC-MRI measurements and a fluid physics model, thereby taking advantage of both the accuracy of PC-MRI and the high spatial resolution of CFD. The use of the proposed approach in regularizing 3D flow fields is evaluated. The proposed algorithm incorporates both a Newtonian fluid physics model and a linear PC-MRI signal model. The model equations are solved numerically using a modified CFD algorithm. The numerical solution corresponds to the optimal solution of a generalized Tikhonov regularization, which provides a flow field that satisfies the flow physics equations, while being close enough to the measured PC-MRI velocity profile. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated on data from the carotid bifurcation of one healthy volunteer, and also from a pulsatile carotid flow phantom. The proposed solver produces flow fields that are in better agreement with direct PC-MRI measurements than CFD alone, and converges faster, while closely satisfying the fluid dynamics equations. For the implementation that provided the best results, the signal-to-error ratio (with respect to the PC-MRI measurements) in the phantom experiment was 6.56 dB higher than that of conventional CFD; in the in vivo experiment, it was 2.15 dB higher. The proposed approach allows partial or complete measurements to be incorporated into a modified CFD solver, for improving the accuracy of the resulting flow fields estimates. This can be used for reducing scan time, increasing the spatial resolution, and/or denoising the PC-MRI measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-925X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-925X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0104-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26611470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Blood Circulation ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Hydrodynamics ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Models, Biological ; Phantoms, Imaging</subject><ispartof>Biomedical engineering online, 2015-11, Vol.14 (1), p.110-110, Article 110</ispartof><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2015</rights><rights>Rispoli et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661988/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1779619045?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,25783,27957,27958,37047,37048,44625,53827,53829</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rispoli, Vinicius C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jon F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Joao L A</creatorcontrib><title>Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI</title><title>Biomedical engineering online</title><addtitle>Biomed Eng Online</addtitle><description>Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. CFD provides arbitrarily high resolution, but its accuracy hinges on model assumptions, while velocity fields measured with PC-MRI generally do not satisfy the equations of fluid dynamics, provide limited resolution, and suffer from partial volume effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a proof-of-concept numerical procedure for constructing a simulated flow field that is influenced by both direct PC-MRI measurements and a fluid physics model, thereby taking advantage of both the accuracy of PC-MRI and the high spatial resolution of CFD. The use of the proposed approach in regularizing 3D flow fields is evaluated. The proposed algorithm incorporates both a Newtonian fluid physics model and a linear PC-MRI signal model. The model equations are solved numerically using a modified CFD algorithm. The numerical solution corresponds to the optimal solution of a generalized Tikhonov regularization, which provides a flow field that satisfies the flow physics equations, while being close enough to the measured PC-MRI velocity profile. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated on data from the carotid bifurcation of one healthy volunteer, and also from a pulsatile carotid flow phantom. The proposed solver produces flow fields that are in better agreement with direct PC-MRI measurements than CFD alone, and converges faster, while closely satisfying the fluid dynamics equations. For the implementation that provided the best results, the signal-to-error ratio (with respect to the PC-MRI measurements) in the phantom experiment was 6.56 dB higher than that of conventional CFD; in the in vivo experiment, it was 2.15 dB higher. The proposed approach allows partial or complete measurements to be incorporated into a modified CFD solver, for improving the accuracy of the resulting flow fields estimates. This can be used for reducing scan time, increasing the spatial resolution, and/or denoising the PC-MRI measurements.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood Circulation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><issn>1475-925X</issn><issn>1475-925X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBsJeONNNWnaJr0RZH4NJoIoCF6ENB-a0TYzaZX5683clOlFSDjvc15OzgvAAUYnGLPiNOC0JCxBOI8HZQndADs4o3lSpvnT5tp7AHZDmCKUIlSU22CQFgWOItoBzyPXzPpOdNa1ooam7q2Cat6KxsoAg236-lsL0BlY1c6pyLgP6PVLVLz91ApWc0gu4OxVBA2lazsvQgdv78d7YMuIOuj91T0Ej1eXD6ObZHJ3PR6dTxKZpbRLcqUqWpSyYmVVFYZKRnCeC0pFgQ0yqUZplSvKYg0pahBBUhkiBCsQMYxIMgRnS99ZXzVaSb0YoeYzbxvh59wJy_8qrX3lL-6dZ3ENJWPR4Hhl4N1br0PHGxukrmvRatcHjilhGSOMZhE9-odOXe_j6hYULaMfyvJI4SUlvQvBa_M7DEZ8ER1fRsdjdHwRHaex53D9F78dP1mRL1Jylgk</recordid><startdate>20151126</startdate><enddate>20151126</enddate><creator>Rispoli, Vinicius C</creator><creator>Nielsen, Jon F</creator><creator>Nayak, Krishna S</creator><creator>Carvalho, Joao L A</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151126</creationdate><title>Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI</title><author>Rispoli, Vinicius C ; Nielsen, Jon F ; Nayak, Krishna S ; Carvalho, Joao L A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood Circulation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rispoli, Vinicius C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jon F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Joao L A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomedical engineering online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rispoli, Vinicius C</au><au>Nielsen, Jon F</au><au>Nayak, Krishna S</au><au>Carvalho, Joao L A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical engineering online</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Eng Online</addtitle><date>2015-11-26</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>110-110</pages><artnum>110</artnum><issn>1475-925X</issn><eissn>1475-925X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. CFD provides arbitrarily high resolution, but its accuracy hinges on model assumptions, while velocity fields measured with PC-MRI generally do not satisfy the equations of fluid dynamics, provide limited resolution, and suffer from partial volume effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a proof-of-concept numerical procedure for constructing a simulated flow field that is influenced by both direct PC-MRI measurements and a fluid physics model, thereby taking advantage of both the accuracy of PC-MRI and the high spatial resolution of CFD. The use of the proposed approach in regularizing 3D flow fields is evaluated. The proposed algorithm incorporates both a Newtonian fluid physics model and a linear PC-MRI signal model. The model equations are solved numerically using a modified CFD algorithm. The numerical solution corresponds to the optimal solution of a generalized Tikhonov regularization, which provides a flow field that satisfies the flow physics equations, while being close enough to the measured PC-MRI velocity profile. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated on data from the carotid bifurcation of one healthy volunteer, and also from a pulsatile carotid flow phantom. The proposed solver produces flow fields that are in better agreement with direct PC-MRI measurements than CFD alone, and converges faster, while closely satisfying the fluid dynamics equations. For the implementation that provided the best results, the signal-to-error ratio (with respect to the PC-MRI measurements) in the phantom experiment was 6.56 dB higher than that of conventional CFD; in the in vivo experiment, it was 2.15 dB higher. The proposed approach allows partial or complete measurements to be incorporated into a modified CFD solver, for improving the accuracy of the resulting flow fields estimates. This can be used for reducing scan time, increasing the spatial resolution, and/or denoising the PC-MRI measurements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>26611470</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12938-015-0104-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-925X
ispartof Biomedical engineering online, 2015-11, Vol.14 (1), p.110-110, Article 110
issn 1475-925X
1475-925X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4661988
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Blood Circulation
Computer Simulation
Humans
Hydrodynamics
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Models, Biological
Phantoms, Imaging
title Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T05%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20fluid%20dynamics%20simulations%20of%20blood%20flow%20regularized%20by%203D%20phase%20contrast%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20engineering%20online&rft.au=Rispoli,%20Vinicius%20C&rft.date=2015-11-26&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=110-110&rft.artnum=110&rft.issn=1475-925X&rft.eissn=1475-925X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12938-015-0104-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1738483874%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5ddb769cb89bb6f7c83155a77a61f0f2e02b5d7855a0d7f030cdf3aa8603f83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779619045&rft_id=info:pmid/26611470&rfr_iscdi=true