Loading…

Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Objective To estimate age-specific probabilities of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation in nondonor (ND) egg cycles. Design Individual patient data meta-analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction centers. Patient(s) Infertile patients undergoing ND mature oocyte cryopreservation. Intervention(s) Pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fertility and sterility 2013-08, Vol.100 (2), p.492-499.e3
Main Authors: Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D, Bang, Heejung, Ph.D, Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3
container_end_page 499.e3
container_issue 2
container_start_page 492
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 100
creator Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D
Bang, Heejung, Ph.D
Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G
description Objective To estimate age-specific probabilities of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation in nondonor (ND) egg cycles. Design Individual patient data meta-analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction centers. Patient(s) Infertile patients undergoing ND mature oocyte cryopreservation. Intervention(s) PubMed was searched for clinical studies on oocyte cryopreservation from January 1996 through July 2011. Randomized and nonrandomized studies that used ND frozen–thawed mature oocytes with pregnancy outcomes were included. Authors of eligible studies were contacted to obtain individual patient data. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth probabilities based on age, cryopreservation method, and the number of oocytes thawed, injected, or embryos transferred. Result(s) Original data from 10 studies including 2,265 cycles from 1,805 patients were obtained. Live birth success rates declined with age regardless of the freezing technique. Despite this age-induced compromise, live births continued to occur as late as ages 42 and 44 years with slowly frozen and vitrified oocytes, respectively. Estimated probabilities of live birth for vitrified oocytes were higher than those for slowly frozen. Conclusion(s) The live birth probabilities we calculated would enable more accurate counseling and informed decisions for infertile women considering oocyte cryopreservation. Given the success probabilities, we suggest that policy makers should consider oocyte freezing as an integral part of prevention and treatment of infertility.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3888550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028213005190</els_id><sourcerecordid>1417535196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL4CPXLKM7ThxOFQqFV9SJQ6lZ8vrTLazJHGwvYvy7_FqS_k4cRlL9jvvjOeZomAc1hx4_Wa37jGkKaYc1wK4XEO1BiEfFSuuVF2qWsnHxQqAqxKEFmfFsxh3AFDzRjwtzoRsoJayXRXj5RbLOKOjnhybg9_YDQ2UFuZ7NtAB2YZCumM_KAfv3ZKQubD4OWDEcLCJ_PSW2YnR1NGBur0d2JxvcUqss8myEZMt7WSHJVJ8Xjzp7RDxxf15Xtx-eP_16lN5_eXj56vL69IppVO54ciFtqLXrVZVL6oG2kZaXmsO1knu-hZEjZXqdeVa61rsbCU0x6zmFTp5XlycfOf9ZsTO5W6CHcwcaLRhMd6S-ftlojuz9QcjtdZKQTZ4fW8Q_Pc9xmRGig6HwU7o99HwijdKKt7WWapPUhd8jAH7hzIczJGW2ZnftMyRloHKZFo59eWfbT4k_sKTBa9Ogt56Y7eBorm9yQ4qkxUt1CIr3p0UmMd5IAwmujx8hx0FdMl0nv6nj4t_TNxAEzk7fMMF487vQwaYf22iMGBujnt1XCsuAfIMQP4EvE3MkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417535196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D ; Bang, Heejung, Ph.D ; Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D ; Bang, Heejung, Ph.D ; Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To estimate age-specific probabilities of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation in nondonor (ND) egg cycles. Design Individual patient data meta-analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction centers. Patient(s) Infertile patients undergoing ND mature oocyte cryopreservation. Intervention(s) PubMed was searched for clinical studies on oocyte cryopreservation from January 1996 through July 2011. Randomized and nonrandomized studies that used ND frozen–thawed mature oocytes with pregnancy outcomes were included. Authors of eligible studies were contacted to obtain individual patient data. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth probabilities based on age, cryopreservation method, and the number of oocytes thawed, injected, or embryos transferred. Result(s) Original data from 10 studies including 2,265 cycles from 1,805 patients were obtained. Live birth success rates declined with age regardless of the freezing technique. Despite this age-induced compromise, live births continued to occur as late as ages 42 and 44 years with slowly frozen and vitrified oocytes, respectively. Estimated probabilities of live birth for vitrified oocytes were higher than those for slowly frozen. Conclusion(s) The live birth probabilities we calculated would enable more accurate counseling and informed decisions for infertile women considering oocyte cryopreservation. Given the success probabilities, we suggest that policy makers should consider oocyte freezing as an integral part of prevention and treatment of infertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23706339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; assisted reproductive technologies ; clinical trials ; counseling ; Cryopreservation ; eggs ; Female ; freezing ; Humans ; individual patient data ; Individuality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infertility, Female - diagnosis ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - therapy ; Internal Medicine ; issues and policy ; Live Birth - epidemiology ; Maternal Age ; meta-analysis ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte cryopreservation ; Oocytes ; patients ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data ; slow freezing ; vitrification ; women</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2013-08, Vol.100 (2), p.492-499.e3</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028213005190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,3568,27957,27958,45815</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Heejung, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</creatorcontrib><title>Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To estimate age-specific probabilities of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation in nondonor (ND) egg cycles. Design Individual patient data meta-analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction centers. Patient(s) Infertile patients undergoing ND mature oocyte cryopreservation. Intervention(s) PubMed was searched for clinical studies on oocyte cryopreservation from January 1996 through July 2011. Randomized and nonrandomized studies that used ND frozen–thawed mature oocytes with pregnancy outcomes were included. Authors of eligible studies were contacted to obtain individual patient data. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth probabilities based on age, cryopreservation method, and the number of oocytes thawed, injected, or embryos transferred. Result(s) Original data from 10 studies including 2,265 cycles from 1,805 patients were obtained. Live birth success rates declined with age regardless of the freezing technique. Despite this age-induced compromise, live births continued to occur as late as ages 42 and 44 years with slowly frozen and vitrified oocytes, respectively. Estimated probabilities of live birth for vitrified oocytes were higher than those for slowly frozen. Conclusion(s) The live birth probabilities we calculated would enable more accurate counseling and informed decisions for infertile women considering oocyte cryopreservation. Given the success probabilities, we suggest that policy makers should consider oocyte freezing as an integral part of prevention and treatment of infertility.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>assisted reproductive technologies</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>counseling</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>eggs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>freezing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>individual patient data</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Live Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte cryopreservation</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>slow freezing</subject><subject>vitrification</subject><subject>women</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL4CPXLKM7ThxOFQqFV9SJQ6lZ8vrTLazJHGwvYvy7_FqS_k4cRlL9jvvjOeZomAc1hx4_Wa37jGkKaYc1wK4XEO1BiEfFSuuVF2qWsnHxQqAqxKEFmfFsxh3AFDzRjwtzoRsoJayXRXj5RbLOKOjnhybg9_YDQ2UFuZ7NtAB2YZCumM_KAfv3ZKQubD4OWDEcLCJ_PSW2YnR1NGBur0d2JxvcUqss8myEZMt7WSHJVJ8Xjzp7RDxxf15Xtx-eP_16lN5_eXj56vL69IppVO54ciFtqLXrVZVL6oG2kZaXmsO1knu-hZEjZXqdeVa61rsbCU0x6zmFTp5XlycfOf9ZsTO5W6CHcwcaLRhMd6S-ftlojuz9QcjtdZKQTZ4fW8Q_Pc9xmRGig6HwU7o99HwijdKKt7WWapPUhd8jAH7hzIczJGW2ZnftMyRloHKZFo59eWfbT4k_sKTBa9Ogt56Y7eBorm9yQ4qkxUt1CIr3p0UmMd5IAwmujx8hx0FdMl0nv6nj4t_TNxAEzk7fMMF487vQwaYf22iMGBujnt1XCsuAfIMQP4EvE3MkA</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D</creator><creator>Bang, Heejung, Ph.D</creator><creator>Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><author>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D ; Bang, Heejung, Ph.D ; Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>assisted reproductive technologies</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>counseling</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>eggs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>freezing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>individual patient data</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Live Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte cryopreservation</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>slow freezing</topic><topic>vitrification</topic><topic>women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Heejung, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cil, Aylin Pelin, M.D</au><au>Bang, Heejung, Ph.D</au><au>Oktay, Kutluk, M.D., F.A.C.O.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>499.e3</epage><pages>492-499.e3</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><notes>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Objective To estimate age-specific probabilities of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation in nondonor (ND) egg cycles. Design Individual patient data meta-analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction centers. Patient(s) Infertile patients undergoing ND mature oocyte cryopreservation. Intervention(s) PubMed was searched for clinical studies on oocyte cryopreservation from January 1996 through July 2011. Randomized and nonrandomized studies that used ND frozen–thawed mature oocytes with pregnancy outcomes were included. Authors of eligible studies were contacted to obtain individual patient data. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth probabilities based on age, cryopreservation method, and the number of oocytes thawed, injected, or embryos transferred. Result(s) Original data from 10 studies including 2,265 cycles from 1,805 patients were obtained. Live birth success rates declined with age regardless of the freezing technique. Despite this age-induced compromise, live births continued to occur as late as ages 42 and 44 years with slowly frozen and vitrified oocytes, respectively. Estimated probabilities of live birth for vitrified oocytes were higher than those for slowly frozen. Conclusion(s) The live birth probabilities we calculated would enable more accurate counseling and informed decisions for infertile women considering oocyte cryopreservation. Given the success probabilities, we suggest that policy makers should consider oocyte freezing as an integral part of prevention and treatment of infertility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23706339</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2013-08, Vol.100 (2), p.492-499.e3
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3888550
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Adult
Age Factors
assisted reproductive technologies
clinical trials
counseling
Cryopreservation
eggs
Female
freezing
Humans
individual patient data
Individuality
Infant, Newborn
Infertility, Female - diagnosis
Infertility, Female - epidemiology
Infertility, Female - therapy
Internal Medicine
issues and policy
Live Birth - epidemiology
Maternal Age
meta-analysis
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oocyte cryopreservation
Oocytes
patients
Pregnancy
pregnancy outcome
Pregnancy Rate
Probability
Prognosis
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data
slow freezing
vitrification
women
title Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T17%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age-specific%20probability%20of%20live%20birth%20with%20oocyte%20cryopreservation:%20an%20individual%20patient%20data%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Cil,%20Aylin%20Pelin,%20M.D&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=499.e3&rft.pages=492-499.e3&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1417535196%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b1e128a2f89854f2470973a16810ac31cf9026e45f84c9ac9eda4281e85414ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417535196&rft_id=info:pmid/23706339&rfr_iscdi=true