Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids

The gustatory receptors of the eel palate were found to be extremely sensitive to amino acids and carboxylic acids. The results obtained are as follows: (a) 11 amino acids which are among naturally occurring amino acids elicited responses in the palatine nerve, but 9 amino acids did not elicit a res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of general physiology 1979-09, Vol.74 (3), p.301-317
Main Authors: Yoshii, K, Kamo, N, Kurihara, K, Kobatake, Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation, Physiological
Amino Acids - pharmacology
Animals
Carboxylic Acids - pharmacology
Fishes - physiology
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Palate - innervation
Peptide Hydrolases - pharmacology
Sensory Receptor Cells - drug effects
Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology
Structure-Activity Relationship
Taste - physiology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-1b594fc8c45431f7ff1b7e24bc5a0d367ef613d027806fe5c95f1f83136eb8523
cites
container_end_page 317
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title The Journal of general physiology
container_volume 74
creator Yoshii, K
Kamo, N
Kurihara, K
Kobatake, Y
description The gustatory receptors of the eel palate were found to be extremely sensitive to amino acids and carboxylic acids. The results obtained are as follows: (a) 11 amino acids which are among naturally occurring amino acids elicited responses in the palatine nerve, but 9 amino acids did not elicit a response even at a high concentration. The effect of D-amino acids was always much less than that of their corresponding L-isomers. There was no appreciable difference in the effectiveness of an alpha-amino acid (alpha-alanine) and beta-amino acid (beta-alanine). (b) The threshold concentrations of the most potent amino acids (arginine, glycine) were between 10(-8) and 10(-9) M. A linear relation between the magnitude of the response and log stimulus concentration held for a wide concentration range for all the amino acids examined. (c) The palatine receptors responded sensitively to various carboxylic acid solutions whose pH was adjusted to neutral. The threshold concentrations varied between 10(-4) and 10(-7) M. The magnitude of the response at 10(-2) M increased with an increase of carbon chain length. (d) The extent of cross-adaptation was examined with various combinations of amino acids. A variety of the response patterns showing complete cross-adaptation, no cross-adaptation, or synergetic interaction was observed. The synergetic interaction was also observed when one amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid. No cross-adaptation was observed between amino acids and fatty acids. (e) The treatment of the palate with papain led to loss of the responses to arginine, glycine, and histidine without affecting those to proline and acetic acid. The treatment with pronase E eliminated selectively the response to proline. The possibility that the eel gustatory receptors are responsible for sensing food at a distance was discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1085/jgp.74.3.301
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2228525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74740226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-1b594fc8c45431f7ff1b7e24bc5a0d367ef613d027806fe5c95f1f83136eb8523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9LwzAUx4M4dE5v3rz05MnO_GzaiyBDpzAQQc8hTV9mR9vUpBX33xvdEH2HPMj3k-8L74vQOcFzgnNxvVn3c8nnbM4wOUBTIjhOpeT5IZpiTGlKaCGO0UkIGxxLUHyEJqwghE7R83IMgx6c3yYeQu-6ACFxNgFokl43eqg7iIqBPjIhGVyi27qLp6mrkOiuSoz2pfvcNrXZXZ6iidVNgLN9n6HX-7uXxUO6elo-Lm5XqeGcDSkpRcGtyQ0XnBErrSWlBMpLIzSuWCbBZoRVmMocZxaEKYQlNmeEZVDmgrIZutn59mPZQmWgG7xuVO_rVvutcrpW_5WuflNr96EopfG9iAaXewPv3kcIg2rrYKBpdAduDEpyyeP2sghe7UDjXQge7O8QgtV3ACoGEHHFVAwg4hd_P_YL_2ycfQGsM4MJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74740226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Yoshii, K ; Kamo, N ; Kurihara, K ; Kobatake, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshii, K ; Kamo, N ; Kurihara, K ; Kobatake, Y</creatorcontrib><description>The gustatory receptors of the eel palate were found to be extremely sensitive to amino acids and carboxylic acids. The results obtained are as follows: (a) 11 amino acids which are among naturally occurring amino acids elicited responses in the palatine nerve, but 9 amino acids did not elicit a response even at a high concentration. The effect of D-amino acids was always much less than that of their corresponding L-isomers. There was no appreciable difference in the effectiveness of an alpha-amino acid (alpha-alanine) and beta-amino acid (beta-alanine). (b) The threshold concentrations of the most potent amino acids (arginine, glycine) were between 10(-8) and 10(-9) M. A linear relation between the magnitude of the response and log stimulus concentration held for a wide concentration range for all the amino acids examined. (c) The palatine receptors responded sensitively to various carboxylic acid solutions whose pH was adjusted to neutral. The threshold concentrations varied between 10(-4) and 10(-7) M. The magnitude of the response at 10(-2) M increased with an increase of carbon chain length. (d) The extent of cross-adaptation was examined with various combinations of amino acids. A variety of the response patterns showing complete cross-adaptation, no cross-adaptation, or synergetic interaction was observed. The synergetic interaction was also observed when one amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid. No cross-adaptation was observed between amino acids and fatty acids. (e) The treatment of the palate with papain led to loss of the responses to arginine, glycine, and histidine without affecting those to proline and acetic acid. The treatment with pronase E eliminated selectively the response to proline. The possibility that the eel gustatory receptors are responsible for sensing food at a distance was discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-7748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1085/jgp.74.3.301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Rockefeller University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Amino Acids - pharmacology ; Animals ; Carboxylic Acids - pharmacology ; Fishes - physiology ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Palate - innervation ; Peptide Hydrolases - pharmacology ; Sensory Receptor Cells - drug effects ; Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology ; Structure-Activity Relationship ; Taste - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of general physiology, 1979-09, Vol.74 (3), p.301-317</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-1b594fc8c45431f7ff1b7e24bc5a0d367ef613d027806fe5c95f1f83136eb8523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228525/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228525/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,27957,27958,53827,53829</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshii, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamo, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurihara, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobatake, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids</title><title>The Journal of general physiology</title><addtitle>J Gen Physiol</addtitle><description>The gustatory receptors of the eel palate were found to be extremely sensitive to amino acids and carboxylic acids. The results obtained are as follows: (a) 11 amino acids which are among naturally occurring amino acids elicited responses in the palatine nerve, but 9 amino acids did not elicit a response even at a high concentration. The effect of D-amino acids was always much less than that of their corresponding L-isomers. There was no appreciable difference in the effectiveness of an alpha-amino acid (alpha-alanine) and beta-amino acid (beta-alanine). (b) The threshold concentrations of the most potent amino acids (arginine, glycine) were between 10(-8) and 10(-9) M. A linear relation between the magnitude of the response and log stimulus concentration held for a wide concentration range for all the amino acids examined. (c) The palatine receptors responded sensitively to various carboxylic acid solutions whose pH was adjusted to neutral. The threshold concentrations varied between 10(-4) and 10(-7) M. The magnitude of the response at 10(-2) M increased with an increase of carbon chain length. (d) The extent of cross-adaptation was examined with various combinations of amino acids. A variety of the response patterns showing complete cross-adaptation, no cross-adaptation, or synergetic interaction was observed. The synergetic interaction was also observed when one amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid. No cross-adaptation was observed between amino acids and fatty acids. (e) The treatment of the palate with papain led to loss of the responses to arginine, glycine, and histidine without affecting those to proline and acetic acid. The treatment with pronase E eliminated selectively the response to proline. The possibility that the eel gustatory receptors are responsible for sensing food at a distance was discussed.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Amino Acids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Carboxylic Acids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Palate - innervation</subject><subject>Peptide Hydrolases - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><issn>0022-1295</issn><issn>1540-7748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9LwzAUx4M4dE5v3rz05MnO_GzaiyBDpzAQQc8hTV9mR9vUpBX33xvdEH2HPMj3k-8L74vQOcFzgnNxvVn3c8nnbM4wOUBTIjhOpeT5IZpiTGlKaCGO0UkIGxxLUHyEJqwghE7R83IMgx6c3yYeQu-6ACFxNgFokl43eqg7iIqBPjIhGVyi27qLp6mrkOiuSoz2pfvcNrXZXZ6iidVNgLN9n6HX-7uXxUO6elo-Lm5XqeGcDSkpRcGtyQ0XnBErrSWlBMpLIzSuWCbBZoRVmMocZxaEKYQlNmeEZVDmgrIZutn59mPZQmWgG7xuVO_rVvutcrpW_5WuflNr96EopfG9iAaXewPv3kcIg2rrYKBpdAduDEpyyeP2sghe7UDjXQge7O8QgtV3ACoGEHHFVAwg4hd_P_YL_2ycfQGsM4MJ</recordid><startdate>19790901</startdate><enddate>19790901</enddate><creator>Yoshii, K</creator><creator>Kamo, N</creator><creator>Kurihara, K</creator><creator>Kobatake, Y</creator><general>The Rockefeller University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790901</creationdate><title>Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids</title><author>Yoshii, K ; Kamo, N ; Kurihara, K ; Kobatake, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-1b594fc8c45431f7ff1b7e24bc5a0d367ef613d027806fe5c95f1f83136eb8523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Amino Acids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Carboxylic Acids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Palate - innervation</topic><topic>Peptide Hydrolases - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshii, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamo, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurihara, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobatake, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of general physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshii, K</au><au>Kamo, N</au><au>Kurihara, K</au><au>Kobatake, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of general physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Physiol</addtitle><date>1979-09-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>301-317</pages><issn>0022-1295</issn><eissn>1540-7748</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The gustatory receptors of the eel palate were found to be extremely sensitive to amino acids and carboxylic acids. The results obtained are as follows: (a) 11 amino acids which are among naturally occurring amino acids elicited responses in the palatine nerve, but 9 amino acids did not elicit a response even at a high concentration. The effect of D-amino acids was always much less than that of their corresponding L-isomers. There was no appreciable difference in the effectiveness of an alpha-amino acid (alpha-alanine) and beta-amino acid (beta-alanine). (b) The threshold concentrations of the most potent amino acids (arginine, glycine) were between 10(-8) and 10(-9) M. A linear relation between the magnitude of the response and log stimulus concentration held for a wide concentration range for all the amino acids examined. (c) The palatine receptors responded sensitively to various carboxylic acid solutions whose pH was adjusted to neutral. The threshold concentrations varied between 10(-4) and 10(-7) M. The magnitude of the response at 10(-2) M increased with an increase of carbon chain length. (d) The extent of cross-adaptation was examined with various combinations of amino acids. A variety of the response patterns showing complete cross-adaptation, no cross-adaptation, or synergetic interaction was observed. The synergetic interaction was also observed when one amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid below its threshold concentration was added to the other amino acid. No cross-adaptation was observed between amino acids and fatty acids. (e) The treatment of the palate with papain led to loss of the responses to arginine, glycine, and histidine without affecting those to proline and acetic acid. The treatment with pronase E eliminated selectively the response to proline. The possibility that the eel gustatory receptors are responsible for sensing food at a distance was discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Rockefeller University Press</pub><pmid>39112</pmid><doi>10.1085/jgp.74.3.301</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1295
ispartof The Journal of general physiology, 1979-09, Vol.74 (3), p.301-317
issn 0022-1295
1540-7748
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2228525
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Amino Acids - pharmacology
Animals
Carboxylic Acids - pharmacology
Fishes - physiology
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Palate - innervation
Peptide Hydrolases - pharmacology
Sensory Receptor Cells - drug effects
Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology
Structure-Activity Relationship
Taste - physiology
title Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T05%3A29%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gustatory%20responses%20of%20eel%20palatine%20receptors%20to%20amino%20acids%20and%20carboxylic%20acids&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20general%20physiology&rft.au=Yoshii,%20K&rft.date=1979-09-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=301-317&rft.issn=0022-1295&rft.eissn=1540-7748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1085/jgp.74.3.301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E74740226%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-1b594fc8c45431f7ff1b7e24bc5a0d367ef613d027806fe5c95f1f83136eb8523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74740226&rft_id=info:pmid/39112&rfr_iscdi=true