Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool

Currently, there are no common industry practices or regulatory guidances available that can be used to technically evaluate the suitability of different lyophilizer units for the successful transfer of lyophilization cycles. This study describes a comprehensive methodology for establishing function...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmaceutical Technology 2009-09, Vol.33 (9), p.54
Main Authors: Mungikar, Amol, Ludzinski, Miron, Kamat, Madhav
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Comparative analysis
Freezing
Methods
Pharmaceutical industry
Process controls
Studies
Temperature
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 54
container_title Pharmaceutical Technology
container_volume 33
creator Mungikar, Amol
Ludzinski, Miron
Kamat, Madhav
description Currently, there are no common industry practices or regulatory guidances available that can be used to technically evaluate the suitability of different lyophilizer units for the successful transfer of lyophilization cycles. This study describes a comprehensive methodology for establishing functional equivalence between different lyophilizers, which can then be used to predict suitability of cycle transfers. The authors discuss the comparative and operational qualification methods that were used. Results show that the proposed methodology provides the necessary basis to establish functional equivalence between different lyophilizer units. Once functional equivalence is established, it is expected that testing requirements and process validation protocols can be optimized, resulting in considerable savings of time, resources, and capital. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_198264886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884059131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-412b5795b1f131878aadda9a88c7ad9eb772f955abb62767346974ce8fab7bf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYMoWEf_IX5AoEmavGQppaMDhdl0P7y06UwlNJ2mFerXO6Kruzjn3DuSCa5yBhL0Pcm4KiQTSvBH8pTSZ54LabjIyKH6wrDiMoxnul_HdhniiIFW13W4AT-2G8VEkdZbnC5DGL7x12Dl1gZPmxnH1PuZNjGGZ_LQY0j-5X93pNlXTfnB6uP7oXyr2WT1wgounAKrHO-55AYMYtehRWNawM56ByB6qxQ6pwVokIW2ULTe9OjA3Zodef27neZ4XX1aTrOf4rykE7dG6MIYLX8ATHRJXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>198264886</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Mungikar, Amol ; Ludzinski, Miron ; Kamat, Madhav</creator><creatorcontrib>Mungikar, Amol ; Ludzinski, Miron ; Kamat, Madhav</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, there are no common industry practices or regulatory guidances available that can be used to technically evaluate the suitability of different lyophilizer units for the successful transfer of lyophilization cycles. This study describes a comprehensive methodology for establishing functional equivalence between different lyophilizers, which can then be used to predict suitability of cycle transfers. The authors discuss the comparative and operational qualification methods that were used. Results show that the proposed methodology provides the necessary basis to establish functional equivalence between different lyophilizer units. Once functional equivalence is established, it is expected that testing requirements and process validation protocols can be optimized, resulting in considerable savings of time, resources, and capital. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-7376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Monmouth Junction: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Freezing ; Methods ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Process controls ; Studies ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical Technology, 2009-09, Vol.33 (9), p.54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Advanstar Communications, Inc. Sep 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198264886?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,786,790,797,15343,36097,44398</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mungikar, Amol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludzinski, Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamat, Madhav</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool</title><title>Pharmaceutical Technology</title><description>Currently, there are no common industry practices or regulatory guidances available that can be used to technically evaluate the suitability of different lyophilizer units for the successful transfer of lyophilization cycles. This study describes a comprehensive methodology for establishing functional equivalence between different lyophilizers, which can then be used to predict suitability of cycle transfers. The authors discuss the comparative and operational qualification methods that were used. Results show that the proposed methodology provides the necessary basis to establish functional equivalence between different lyophilizer units. Once functional equivalence is established, it is expected that testing requirements and process validation protocols can be optimized, resulting in considerable savings of time, resources, and capital. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>1543-2521</issn><issn>2150-7376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYMoWEf_IX5AoEmavGQppaMDhdl0P7y06UwlNJ2mFerXO6Kruzjn3DuSCa5yBhL0Pcm4KiQTSvBH8pTSZ54LabjIyKH6wrDiMoxnul_HdhniiIFW13W4AT-2G8VEkdZbnC5DGL7x12Dl1gZPmxnH1PuZNjGGZ_LQY0j-5X93pNlXTfnB6uP7oXyr2WT1wgounAKrHO-55AYMYtehRWNawM56ByB6qxQ6pwVokIW2ULTe9OjA3Zodef27neZ4XX1aTrOf4rykE7dG6MIYLX8ATHRJXg</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Mungikar, Amol</creator><creator>Ludzinski, Miron</creator><creator>Kamat, Madhav</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RN</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>889</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool</title><author>Mungikar, Amol ; Ludzinski, Miron ; Kamat, Madhav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-412b5795b1f131878aadda9a88c7ad9eb772f955abb62767346974ce8fab7bf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mungikar, Amol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludzinski, Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamat, Madhav</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Pharmaceutical News Index</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Pharmaceutical News Index (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mungikar, Amol</au><au>Ludzinski, Miron</au><au>Kamat, Madhav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical Technology</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>54</spage><pages>54-</pages><issn>1543-2521</issn><eissn>2150-7376</eissn><abstract>Currently, there are no common industry practices or regulatory guidances available that can be used to technically evaluate the suitability of different lyophilizer units for the successful transfer of lyophilization cycles. This study describes a comprehensive methodology for establishing functional equivalence between different lyophilizers, which can then be used to predict suitability of cycle transfers. The authors discuss the comparative and operational qualification methods that were used. Results show that the proposed methodology provides the necessary basis to establish functional equivalence between different lyophilizer units. Once functional equivalence is established, it is expected that testing requirements and process validation protocols can be optimized, resulting in considerable savings of time, resources, and capital. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Monmouth Junction</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1543-2521
ispartof Pharmaceutical Technology, 2009-09, Vol.33 (9), p.54
issn 1543-2521
2150-7376
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_198264886
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Business Source Ultimate
subjects Comparative analysis
Freezing
Methods
Pharmaceutical industry
Process controls
Studies
Temperature
title Evaluating Functional Equivalency as a Lyophilization-Cycle Transfer Tool
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T03%3A29%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Functional%20Equivalency%20as%20a%20Lyophilization-Cycle%20Transfer%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20Technology&rft.au=Mungikar,%20Amol&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=54&rft.pages=54-&rft.issn=1543-2521&rft.eissn=2150-7376&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1884059131%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-412b5795b1f131878aadda9a88c7ad9eb772f955abb62767346974ce8fab7bf13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198264886&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true