Loading…
The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come
The U.S. federal budgeting system faces severe challenges in coming years. Deficits are being recorded at levels and with regularity not seen in prior periods. This article suggests that such problems reflect the uncomfortable mix of logics informing budgetary and political institutions—that is, the...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Public administration review 2011-05, Vol.71 (3), p.345-348 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3 |
| container_end_page | 348 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 345 |
| container_title | Public administration review |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Andrews, Matt |
| description | The U.S. federal budgeting system faces severe challenges in coming years. Deficits are being recorded at levels and with regularity not seen in prior periods. This article suggests that such problems reflect the uncomfortable mix of logics informing budgetary and political institutions—that is, the rules of the game. Logics make it appropriate to expect that government be limited in its tax demands but simultaneously responsive in providing expensive services necessary for the achievement of the American dream, for example. Crisis is needed to allow the emergence of institutional forms that mediate between these conflicting logics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02352.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914787631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23017488</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23017488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhi00JDrYT5hk7WZMWrrjzzgXQ4JqBbTuQwjEpWVspyRLG2YnWvvv5xDUi10MfGPL73Ne6ehBCBOYknQ-1VMiOGSSpg8KhEyBMkGnmz002QWv0ASAsYyl5AC9jrEGIJRwNUGfr-89Pr5sPjTtsrIRtyWee-eDafBZ75a-q9bLj9isHb693-JZqGIV8bc-dnjWrvwR2i9NE_2bp_sQ3cy_XM8ussWP88vZ6SKzggHNqCycscq7nOXMCCNAlYLliit-Z4s7WxpwpRNUSOuJKyhjxigplTMF8VaV7BC9H3sfQvu797HTqypa3zRm7ds-6oLwXOWSkedJyAsqJc8TefxfkgDjjCeUJ_TdP2jd9mGdNtYFByUJFzRBaoRsaGMMvtQPoVqZsE1NelClaz0Y0YMRPajSj6r0Jo2ejKN_qsZvXzynf96cXg3PVPB2LKhj14ZdAWVAcq5UyrMxr2LnN7vchF9aJidC334_17C4El_P5qAv2F-2fq7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>940861452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】</source><creator>Andrews, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. federal budgeting system faces severe challenges in coming years. Deficits are being recorded at levels and with regularity not seen in prior periods. This article suggests that such problems reflect the uncomfortable mix of logics informing budgetary and political institutions—that is, the rules of the game. Logics make it appropriate to expect that government be limited in its tax demands but simultaneously responsive in providing expensive services necessary for the achievement of the American dream, for example. Crisis is needed to allow the emergence of institutional forms that mediate between these conflicting logics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02352.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Budget deficit ; Budget deficits ; Budget reform ; Budget, Government ; Budgets ; Economic competition ; Economic crisis ; Federal budget deficit ; Federal Government ; Financial crisis ; Government ; Government crises ; Government spending ; Logic ; Political Institutions ; Public budgeting ; Reforms ; Separation of powers ; Services ; Tax policy ; Taxation ; The Changing Concept of a Federal Executive Budget: A Senior— Junior Exchange ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States federal budget ; United States of America ; Zero based budgeting</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2011-05, Vol.71 (3), p.345-348</ispartof><rights>2011 American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. May/Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6210.2011.02352.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6210.2011.02352.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27898,27957,27958,33258,33259,50923,51032,58593,58826</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>The U.S. federal budgeting system faces severe challenges in coming years. Deficits are being recorded at levels and with regularity not seen in prior periods. This article suggests that such problems reflect the uncomfortable mix of logics informing budgetary and political institutions—that is, the rules of the game. Logics make it appropriate to expect that government be limited in its tax demands but simultaneously responsive in providing expensive services necessary for the achievement of the American dream, for example. Crisis is needed to allow the emergence of institutional forms that mediate between these conflicting logics.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Budget deficit</subject><subject>Budget deficits</subject><subject>Budget reform</subject><subject>Budget, Government</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Federal budget deficit</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Financial crisis</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government crises</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Political Institutions</subject><subject>Public budgeting</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Separation of powers</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>The Changing Concept of a Federal Executive Budget: A Senior— Junior Exchange</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States federal budget</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Zero based budgeting</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhi00JDrYT5hk7WZMWrrjzzgXQ4JqBbTuQwjEpWVspyRLG2YnWvvv5xDUi10MfGPL73Ne6ehBCBOYknQ-1VMiOGSSpg8KhEyBMkGnmz002QWv0ASAsYyl5AC9jrEGIJRwNUGfr-89Pr5sPjTtsrIRtyWee-eDafBZ75a-q9bLj9isHb693-JZqGIV8bc-dnjWrvwR2i9NE_2bp_sQ3cy_XM8ussWP88vZ6SKzggHNqCycscq7nOXMCCNAlYLliit-Z4s7WxpwpRNUSOuJKyhjxigplTMF8VaV7BC9H3sfQvu797HTqypa3zRm7ds-6oLwXOWSkedJyAsqJc8TefxfkgDjjCeUJ_TdP2jd9mGdNtYFByUJFzRBaoRsaGMMvtQPoVqZsE1NelClaz0Y0YMRPajSj6r0Jo2ejKN_qsZvXzynf96cXg3PVPB2LKhj14ZdAWVAcq5UyrMxr2LnN7vchF9aJidC334_17C4El_P5qAv2F-2fq7Q</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Andrews, Matt</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come</title><author>Andrews, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Budget deficit</topic><topic>Budget deficits</topic><topic>Budget reform</topic><topic>Budget, Government</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Federal budget deficit</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Financial crisis</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government crises</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Political Institutions</topic><topic>Public budgeting</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Separation of powers</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>The Changing Concept of a Federal Executive Budget: A Senior— Junior Exchange</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States federal budget</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Zero based budgeting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>345-348</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-0LR5KBF0-H</notes><notes>istex:C0A3D94B2BD854EECBF370A38B766BE4AA2A64ED</notes><notes>ArticleID:PUAR2352</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><abstract>The U.S. federal budgeting system faces severe challenges in coming years. Deficits are being recorded at levels and with regularity not seen in prior periods. This article suggests that such problems reflect the uncomfortable mix of logics informing budgetary and political institutions—that is, the rules of the game. Logics make it appropriate to expect that government be limited in its tax demands but simultaneously responsive in providing expensive services necessary for the achievement of the American dream, for example. Crisis is needed to allow the emergence of institutional forms that mediate between these conflicting logics.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02352.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
| ispartof | Public administration review, 2011-05, Vol.71 (3), p.345-348 |
| issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914787631 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】 |
| subjects | Ambiguity Budget deficit Budget deficits Budget reform Budget, Government Budgets Economic competition Economic crisis Federal budget deficit Federal Government Financial crisis Government Government crises Government spending Logic Political Institutions Public budgeting Reforms Separation of powers Services Tax policy Taxation The Changing Concept of a Federal Executive Budget: A Senior— Junior Exchange U.S.A United States United States federal budget United States of America Zero based budgeting |
| title | The (Il)logics of Federal Budgeting, and Why Crisis Must Come |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T02%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20(Il)logics%20of%20Federal%20Budgeting,%20and%20Why%20Crisis%20Must%20Come&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Andrews,%20Matt&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=345-348&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02352.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23017488%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5302-269dac8ed7373a5a508f5378484bc9bcfa0dfd5256ce1d9233aa8668da91ec8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=940861452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23017488&rfr_iscdi=true |