Loading…

The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in medical science 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604
Main Authors: Kara, Haluk Baris, Nilgun Ozturk, A., Aykent, Filiz, Koc, Ozlem, Ozturk, Bora
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3
container_end_page 604
container_issue 5
container_start_page 599
container_title Lasers in medical science
container_volume 26
creator Kara, Haluk Baris
Nilgun Ozturk, A.
Aykent, Filiz
Koc, Ozlem
Ozturk, Bora
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups ( n  = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm 2 ). Following determination of surface roughness (R a ) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904483428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtunlYnmzS7e5TiFxS8VPAWstnJdkub1Mwu4r83pZ69PBnC8w7My9itgHsBUD2QAAGyyCigBl00Z2wmlFwUGtTnOZtBqeuibkpxya6ItgCi0kLOmFlvkKP36EYePe-GPCYMI6cpeeuQjwntuM8_xGPgKU79JiCRDR1vYwZlIfTjhg-B7-I39xMNoecOk90Pjq7Zhbc7wpu_d84-np_Wy9di9f7ytnxcFU6WMBatk7JttYXOda1fCGlrWWdAvfAOusrqFlFhqVpvrfa60UpBK61a-KpDj3LO7k57Dyl-TUij2Q_kcLezAeNEpgGlaqnKOpviZLoUiRJ6c0jD3qYfI8AcuzSnLk2GOXZpmpwpTxnKbugxmW2cUsgH_RP6BZcMeYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904483428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</creator><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups ( n  = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm 2 ). Following determination of surface roughness (R a ) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups ( p  &gt; .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Lasers ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Photonics ; Quantum Optics</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aykent, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koc, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups ( n  = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm 2 ). Following determination of surface roughness (R a ) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups ( p  &gt; .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtunlYnmzS7e5TiFxS8VPAWstnJdkub1Mwu4r83pZ69PBnC8w7My9itgHsBUD2QAAGyyCigBl00Z2wmlFwUGtTnOZtBqeuibkpxya6ItgCi0kLOmFlvkKP36EYePe-GPCYMI6cpeeuQjwntuM8_xGPgKU79JiCRDR1vYwZlIfTjhg-B7-I39xMNoecOk90Pjq7Zhbc7wpu_d84-np_Wy9di9f7ytnxcFU6WMBatk7JttYXOda1fCGlrWWdAvfAOusrqFlFhqVpvrfa60UpBK61a-KpDj3LO7k57Dyl-TUij2Q_kcLezAeNEpgGlaqnKOpviZLoUiRJ6c0jD3qYfI8AcuzSnLk2GOXZpmpwpTxnKbugxmW2cUsgH_RP6BZcMeYk</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Kara, Haluk Baris</creator><creator>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creator><creator>Aykent, Filiz</creator><creator>Koc, Ozlem</creator><creator>Ozturk, Bora</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><author>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aykent, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koc, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kara, Haluk Baris</au><au>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</au><au>Aykent, Filiz</au><au>Koc, Ozlem</au><au>Ozturk, Bora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>599-604</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups ( n  = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm 2 ). Following determination of surface roughness (R a ) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments ( p  &lt; .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value ( p  &lt; .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups ( p  &gt; .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-8921
ispartof Lasers in medical science, 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604
issn 0268-8921
1435-604X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483428
source Springer Link
subjects Dentistry
Lasers
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Optical Devices
Optics
Original Article
Photonics
Quantum Optics
title The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20different%20surface%20treatments%20on%20roughnessand%20bond%20strength%20in%20low%20fusing%20ceramics&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Kara,%20Haluk%20Baris&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=599-604&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904483428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904483428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true