Loading…
The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lasers in medical science 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3 |
container_end_page | 604 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | Lasers in medical science |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Kara, Haluk Baris Nilgun Ozturk, A. Aykent, Filiz Koc, Ozlem Ozturk, Bora |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (
n
= 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm
2
). Following determination of surface roughness (R
a
) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904483428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtunlYnmzS7e5TiFxS8VPAWstnJdkub1Mwu4r83pZ69PBnC8w7My9itgHsBUD2QAAGyyCigBl00Z2wmlFwUGtTnOZtBqeuibkpxya6ItgCi0kLOmFlvkKP36EYePe-GPCYMI6cpeeuQjwntuM8_xGPgKU79JiCRDR1vYwZlIfTjhg-B7-I39xMNoecOk90Pjq7Zhbc7wpu_d84-np_Wy9di9f7ytnxcFU6WMBatk7JttYXOda1fCGlrWWdAvfAOusrqFlFhqVpvrfa60UpBK61a-KpDj3LO7k57Dyl-TUij2Q_kcLezAeNEpgGlaqnKOpviZLoUiRJ6c0jD3qYfI8AcuzSnLk2GOXZpmpwpTxnKbugxmW2cUsgH_RP6BZcMeYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904483428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</creator><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (
n
= 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm
2
). Following determination of surface roughness (R
a
) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups (
p
> .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Lasers ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Photonics ; Quantum Optics</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aykent, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koc, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (
n
= 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm
2
). Following determination of surface roughness (R
a
) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups (
p
> .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtunlYnmzS7e5TiFxS8VPAWstnJdkub1Mwu4r83pZ69PBnC8w7My9itgHsBUD2QAAGyyCigBl00Z2wmlFwUGtTnOZtBqeuibkpxya6ItgCi0kLOmFlvkKP36EYePe-GPCYMI6cpeeuQjwntuM8_xGPgKU79JiCRDR1vYwZlIfTjhg-B7-I39xMNoecOk90Pjq7Zhbc7wpu_d84-np_Wy9di9f7ytnxcFU6WMBatk7JttYXOda1fCGlrWWdAvfAOusrqFlFhqVpvrfa60UpBK61a-KpDj3LO7k57Dyl-TUij2Q_kcLezAeNEpgGlaqnKOpviZLoUiRJ6c0jD3qYfI8AcuzSnLk2GOXZpmpwpTxnKbugxmW2cUsgH_RP6BZcMeYk</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Kara, Haluk Baris</creator><creator>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creator><creator>Aykent, Filiz</creator><creator>Koc, Ozlem</creator><creator>Ozturk, Bora</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</title><author>Kara, Haluk Baris ; Nilgun Ozturk, A. ; Aykent, Filiz ; Koc, Ozlem ; Ozturk, Bora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kara, Haluk Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aykent, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koc, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Bora</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kara, Haluk Baris</au><au>Nilgun Ozturk, A.</au><au>Aykent, Filiz</au><au>Koc, Ozlem</au><au>Ozturk, Bora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>599-604</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (
n
= 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm
2
). Following determination of surface roughness (R
a
) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments (
p
< .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (
p
< .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups (
p
> .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-8921 |
ispartof | Lasers in medical science, 2011-09, Vol.26 (5), p.599-604 |
issn | 0268-8921 1435-604X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483428 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Dentistry Lasers Medicine Medicine & Public Health Optical Devices Optics Original Article Photonics Quantum Optics |
title | The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20different%20surface%20treatments%20on%20roughnessand%20bond%20strength%20in%20low%20fusing%20ceramics&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Kara,%20Haluk%20Baris&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=599-604&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904483428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-bc33bb6a0dcdbf513a8383a8085fc0d7a6bee4e24bfaa6f696440b3a45f7defe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904483428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |