Loading…
Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems
► Unique aspects concerning the airworthiness of unmanned aircraft are described. ► A framework for the regulation of unmanned aircraft is proposed using a risk matrix. ► Approach is justifiable, systematic and comprehensive in managing the risk profile. ► Permits a flexible tailoring of regulations...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Safety science 2011-07, Vol.49 (6), p.871-885 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3 |
| container_end_page | 885 |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 871 |
| container_title | Safety science |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Clothier, Reece A. Palmer, Jennifer L. Walker, Rodney A. Fulton, Neale L. |
| description | ► Unique aspects concerning the airworthiness of unmanned aircraft are described. ► A framework for the regulation of unmanned aircraft is proposed using a risk matrix. ► Approach is justifiable, systematic and comprehensive in managing the risk profile. ► Permits a flexible tailoring of regulations proportionate to the degree of risk. ► Can also be used to structure regulations relating to airspace integration.
The development of effective safety regulations for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is an issue of paramount concern for industry. The development of this framework is a prerequisite for greater UAS access to civil airspace and, subsequently, the continued growth of the UAS industry. The direct use of the existing conventionally piloted aircraft (CPA) airworthiness certification framework for the regulation of UAS has a number of limitations. The objective of this paper is to present one possible approach for the structuring of airworthiness regulations for civilian UAS. The proposed approach facilitates a more systematic, objective and justifiable method for managing the spectrum of risk associated with the diversity of UAS and their potential operations. A risk matrix is used to guide the development of an airworthiness certification matrix (ACM). The ACM provides a structured categorisation that facilitates the future tailoring of regulations proportionate to the levels of risk associated with the operation of the UAS. As a result, an objective and traceable link may be established between mandated regulations and the overarching objective for an equivalent level of safety to CPA. The ACM also facilitates the systematic consideration of a range of technical and operational mitigation strategies. For these reasons, the ACM is proposed as a suitable method for the structuring of an airworthiness certification framework for civil or commercially operated UAS (i.e., the UAS equivalent in function to the Part 21 regulations for civil CPA) and for the further structuring of requirements on the operation of UAS in un-segregated airspace. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.004 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883038133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753511000270</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671354370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPHDEURq0okdhA_gDVNFFoZnL99ko0EZCHhEQDTRrL47lWvJnxgD1LxL_Hk0WUVC7uOZ-lQ8gphY4CVV93XSk-dgwo7YB1AOId2VCjty0Fwd6TDWyZbLXk8oh8LGUHAJQruiG_LzHEFJc4p2YOjUuNi_nfnJc_MWEpjce8xBC9-0-E7Cas179NmHPj42Mcm32aXEo4rKLPLixNeSoLTuWEfAhuLPjp5T0md9-vbi9-ttc3P35dfLtuveDbpRXCaSd7w4zvg1FDr2nopRiAKRcU0iD9YIzhyhmQWnMvA_S9Qo2CBbXt-TH5cti9z_PDHstip1g8jqNLOO-LrS5wQzmv5NmbJFWacim4hoqyA-rzXErGYO9znFx-shTsmtzu7JrcrsktMFuTV-nzy74r3o21VvKxvJpMMGAC1vHzA4c1y2PEbOsSJo9DzOgXO8zxrW-eAXE7mJc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671354370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Clothier, Reece A. ; Palmer, Jennifer L. ; Walker, Rodney A. ; Fulton, Neale L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clothier, Reece A. ; Palmer, Jennifer L. ; Walker, Rodney A. ; Fulton, Neale L.</creatorcontrib><description>► Unique aspects concerning the airworthiness of unmanned aircraft are described. ► A framework for the regulation of unmanned aircraft is proposed using a risk matrix. ► Approach is justifiable, systematic and comprehensive in managing the risk profile. ► Permits a flexible tailoring of regulations proportionate to the degree of risk. ► Can also be used to structure regulations relating to airspace integration.
The development of effective safety regulations for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is an issue of paramount concern for industry. The development of this framework is a prerequisite for greater UAS access to civil airspace and, subsequently, the continued growth of the UAS industry. The direct use of the existing conventionally piloted aircraft (CPA) airworthiness certification framework for the regulation of UAS has a number of limitations. The objective of this paper is to present one possible approach for the structuring of airworthiness regulations for civilian UAS. The proposed approach facilitates a more systematic, objective and justifiable method for managing the spectrum of risk associated with the diversity of UAS and their potential operations. A risk matrix is used to guide the development of an airworthiness certification matrix (ACM). The ACM provides a structured categorisation that facilitates the future tailoring of regulations proportionate to the levels of risk associated with the operation of the UAS. As a result, an objective and traceable link may be established between mandated regulations and the overarching objective for an equivalent level of safety to CPA. The ACM also facilitates the systematic consideration of a range of technical and operational mitigation strategies. For these reasons, the ACM is proposed as a suitable method for the structuring of an airworthiness certification framework for civil or commercially operated UAS (i.e., the UAS equivalent in function to the Part 21 regulations for civil CPA) and for the further structuring of requirements on the operation of UAS in un-segregated airspace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Aircraft components ; Airspace ; Airworthiness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Certification ; Control ; Equivalence ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regulation ; Risk ; Risk matrix ; Safety ; UAS ; Unmanned aircraft</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2011-07, Vol.49 (6), p.871-885</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24202400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clothier, Reece A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Neale L.</creatorcontrib><title>Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems</title><title>Safety science</title><description>► Unique aspects concerning the airworthiness of unmanned aircraft are described. ► A framework for the regulation of unmanned aircraft is proposed using a risk matrix. ► Approach is justifiable, systematic and comprehensive in managing the risk profile. ► Permits a flexible tailoring of regulations proportionate to the degree of risk. ► Can also be used to structure regulations relating to airspace integration.
The development of effective safety regulations for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is an issue of paramount concern for industry. The development of this framework is a prerequisite for greater UAS access to civil airspace and, subsequently, the continued growth of the UAS industry. The direct use of the existing conventionally piloted aircraft (CPA) airworthiness certification framework for the regulation of UAS has a number of limitations. The objective of this paper is to present one possible approach for the structuring of airworthiness regulations for civilian UAS. The proposed approach facilitates a more systematic, objective and justifiable method for managing the spectrum of risk associated with the diversity of UAS and their potential operations. A risk matrix is used to guide the development of an airworthiness certification matrix (ACM). The ACM provides a structured categorisation that facilitates the future tailoring of regulations proportionate to the levels of risk associated with the operation of the UAS. As a result, an objective and traceable link may be established between mandated regulations and the overarching objective for an equivalent level of safety to CPA. The ACM also facilitates the systematic consideration of a range of technical and operational mitigation strategies. For these reasons, the ACM is proposed as a suitable method for the structuring of an airworthiness certification framework for civil or commercially operated UAS (i.e., the UAS equivalent in function to the Part 21 regulations for civil CPA) and for the further structuring of requirements on the operation of UAS in un-segregated airspace.</description><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Airspace</subject><subject>Airworthiness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk matrix</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>UAS</subject><subject>Unmanned aircraft</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPHDEURq0okdhA_gDVNFFoZnL99ko0EZCHhEQDTRrL47lWvJnxgD1LxL_Hk0WUVC7uOZ-lQ8gphY4CVV93XSk-dgwo7YB1AOId2VCjty0Fwd6TDWyZbLXk8oh8LGUHAJQruiG_LzHEFJc4p2YOjUuNi_nfnJc_MWEpjce8xBC9-0-E7Cas179NmHPj42Mcm32aXEo4rKLPLixNeSoLTuWEfAhuLPjp5T0md9-vbi9-ttc3P35dfLtuveDbpRXCaSd7w4zvg1FDr2nopRiAKRcU0iD9YIzhyhmQWnMvA_S9Qo2CBbXt-TH5cti9z_PDHstip1g8jqNLOO-LrS5wQzmv5NmbJFWacim4hoqyA-rzXErGYO9znFx-shTsmtzu7JrcrsktMFuTV-nzy74r3o21VvKxvJpMMGAC1vHzA4c1y2PEbOsSJo9DzOgXO8zxrW-eAXE7mJc</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Clothier, Reece A.</creator><creator>Palmer, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Walker, Rodney A.</creator><creator>Fulton, Neale L.</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems</title><author>Clothier, Reece A. ; Palmer, Jennifer L. ; Walker, Rodney A. ; Fulton, Neale L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Airspace</topic><topic>Airworthiness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk matrix</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>UAS</topic><topic>Unmanned aircraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clothier, Reece A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Neale L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clothier, Reece A.</au><au>Palmer, Jennifer L.</au><au>Walker, Rodney A.</au><au>Fulton, Neale L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>871-885</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>► Unique aspects concerning the airworthiness of unmanned aircraft are described. ► A framework for the regulation of unmanned aircraft is proposed using a risk matrix. ► Approach is justifiable, systematic and comprehensive in managing the risk profile. ► Permits a flexible tailoring of regulations proportionate to the degree of risk. ► Can also be used to structure regulations relating to airspace integration.
The development of effective safety regulations for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is an issue of paramount concern for industry. The development of this framework is a prerequisite for greater UAS access to civil airspace and, subsequently, the continued growth of the UAS industry. The direct use of the existing conventionally piloted aircraft (CPA) airworthiness certification framework for the regulation of UAS has a number of limitations. The objective of this paper is to present one possible approach for the structuring of airworthiness regulations for civilian UAS. The proposed approach facilitates a more systematic, objective and justifiable method for managing the spectrum of risk associated with the diversity of UAS and their potential operations. A risk matrix is used to guide the development of an airworthiness certification matrix (ACM). The ACM provides a structured categorisation that facilitates the future tailoring of regulations proportionate to the levels of risk associated with the operation of the UAS. As a result, an objective and traceable link may be established between mandated regulations and the overarching objective for an equivalent level of safety to CPA. The ACM also facilitates the systematic consideration of a range of technical and operational mitigation strategies. For these reasons, the ACM is proposed as a suitable method for the structuring of an airworthiness certification framework for civil or commercially operated UAS (i.e., the UAS equivalent in function to the Part 21 regulations for civil CPA) and for the further structuring of requirements on the operation of UAS in un-segregated airspace.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.004</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0925-7535 |
| ispartof | Safety science, 2011-07, Vol.49 (6), p.871-885 |
| issn | 0925-7535 1879-1042 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883038133 |
| source | Elsevier |
| subjects | Aircraft components Airspace Airworthiness Biological and medical sciences Certification Control Equivalence Medical sciences Miscellaneous Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Regulation Risk Risk matrix Safety UAS Unmanned aircraft |
| title | Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T23%3A29%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Definition%20of%20an%20airworthiness%20certification%20framework%20for%20civil%20unmanned%20aircraft%20systems&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Clothier,%20Reece%20A.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=871-885&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671354370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-44a7a5b828cbf86db71fb54d026af6e1f5cd88836a805773c5f0bb6e7e42f69b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671354370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |