Loading…
A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization
Examining four constructions in three languages (English quantificational nouns, Japanese subordinating conjunctions, Cantonese coverbs, Japanese deverbal post-positions), this paper shows that semantic properties can change faster than syntactic properties in gradual processes of grammaticalization...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of linguistics 2008-03, Vol.44 (1), p.45-86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283 |
container_end_page | 86 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Journal of linguistics |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | FRANCIS, ELAINE J. YUASA, ETSUYO |
description | Examining four constructions in three languages (English quantificational nouns, Japanese subordinating conjunctions, Cantonese coverbs, Japanese deverbal post-positions), this paper shows that semantic properties can change faster than syntactic properties in gradual processes of grammaticalization. In each of these cases, the syntactic properties of one category become associated with the semantic properties of a different category when an item undergoes semantic change, leading to the appearance of mixed categorial properties. We propose that this sort of change is best captured using a multi-modular framework (Sadock 1991, Yuasa 2005), which allows changes to affect semantics independently of syntax, and which shows clearly that the relevant items and constructions still conform to the separate structural constraints of syntax and semantics, despite the unusual combination of properties. These findings are important for theories of grammaticalization because they suggest that the cover term 'decategorialization' (the loss of grammatical properties associated with the source category) must be understood in terms of at least two separate processes: (1) the effects of semantic change on an item's distribution; and (2) the effects of frequency (Bybee & Hopper 2001) and Pressure for Structure-Concept Iconicity (Newmeyer 1998) on an item's syntactic categorization. Our case studies show that the first kind of decategorialization effects can occur even in the absence of the second kind. Implications of these findings, including possible reasons for both the instability and the long-term retention of mismatch constructions, are also considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022226707004951 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85667663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40058028</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40058028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P20AQhlcVSA2hP6AHJAuJ3gyz3u8bUVQCKhJKv66r6XqdOPgj7NoS8OtrN1EO5cBeRtrnmdHMS8hnCpcUqLr6AZANTypQANwI-oFMKJcmVYpnR2Qy4nTkH8lJjBsAysDoCbmeJXVfdWVat3lfYUhwuw0tunXStckqYN5jlbg1NiuflM34U9fYlQ6r8nWobXNKjgusov-0r1Py6-brz_ltev-wuJvP7lPHDXSpzHIpkGY6o1xl4DwTORQ0F1h4gV4WXBSgKGDh_vBceJNzw3OgXlMNItNsSr7s5g7rPfU-drYuo_NVhY1v-2i1kFJJyd4VmTSGMzOK5_-Jm7YPzXCEpUYyxbmCQaI7yYU2xuALuw1ljeHFUrBj8vZN8kPPxX4wxiGoImDjynhozAA0aDoucLbzNrFrw4FzAKHh38npjpex888HjuHRSsWUsHKxtMvl97n-Zrj9zf4CB6aZlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196374470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>FRANCIS, ELAINE J. ; YUASA, ETSUYO</creator><creatorcontrib>FRANCIS, ELAINE J. ; YUASA, ETSUYO</creatorcontrib><description>Examining four constructions in three languages (English quantificational nouns, Japanese subordinating conjunctions, Cantonese coverbs, Japanese deverbal post-positions), this paper shows that semantic properties can change faster than syntactic properties in gradual processes of grammaticalization. In each of these cases, the syntactic properties of one category become associated with the semantic properties of a different category when an item undergoes semantic change, leading to the appearance of mixed categorial properties. We propose that this sort of change is best captured using a multi-modular framework (Sadock 1991, Yuasa 2005), which allows changes to affect semantics independently of syntax, and which shows clearly that the relevant items and constructions still conform to the separate structural constraints of syntax and semantics, despite the unusual combination of properties. These findings are important for theories of grammaticalization because they suggest that the cover term 'decategorialization' (the loss of grammatical properties associated with the source category) must be understood in terms of at least two separate processes: (1) the effects of semantic change on an item's distribution; and (2) the effects of frequency (Bybee & Hopper 2001) and Pressure for Structure-Concept Iconicity (Newmeyer 1998) on an item's syntactic categorization. Our case studies show that the first kind of decategorialization effects can occur even in the absence of the second kind. Implications of these findings, including possible reasons for both the instability and the long-term retention of mismatch constructions, are also considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022226707004951</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLINAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adjectives ; Cantonese ; Case studies ; Changes ; Chinese languages ; Conjunctions ; Construction ; Diachrony and historical linguistics ; English language ; Grammar ; Grammatical constructions ; Grammaticalization ; Iconicity ; Japanese language ; Languages ; Linguistics ; Nouns ; Postpositions ; Predicates ; Product development ; Semantic categories ; Semantic change ; Syntactic change ; Syntactic structures ; Syntactics ; Syntax ; Syntax semantics relationship ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Journal of linguistics, 2008-03, Vol.44 (1), p.45-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/196374470/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/196374470?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,12874,12878,12888,21410,21422,27957,27958,31304,31305,33258,33259,33646,33647,33946,33947,34810,34811,43768,43931,44235,58593,58826,63018,63019,63021,63034,74553,74578,74770,75085</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20080813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRANCIS, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUASA, ETSUYO</creatorcontrib><title>A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization</title><title>Journal of linguistics</title><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><description>Examining four constructions in three languages (English quantificational nouns, Japanese subordinating conjunctions, Cantonese coverbs, Japanese deverbal post-positions), this paper shows that semantic properties can change faster than syntactic properties in gradual processes of grammaticalization. In each of these cases, the syntactic properties of one category become associated with the semantic properties of a different category when an item undergoes semantic change, leading to the appearance of mixed categorial properties. We propose that this sort of change is best captured using a multi-modular framework (Sadock 1991, Yuasa 2005), which allows changes to affect semantics independently of syntax, and which shows clearly that the relevant items and constructions still conform to the separate structural constraints of syntax and semantics, despite the unusual combination of properties. These findings are important for theories of grammaticalization because they suggest that the cover term 'decategorialization' (the loss of grammatical properties associated with the source category) must be understood in terms of at least two separate processes: (1) the effects of semantic change on an item's distribution; and (2) the effects of frequency (Bybee & Hopper 2001) and Pressure for Structure-Concept Iconicity (Newmeyer 1998) on an item's syntactic categorization. Our case studies show that the first kind of decategorialization effects can occur even in the absence of the second kind. Implications of these findings, including possible reasons for both the instability and the long-term retention of mismatch constructions, are also considered.</description><subject>Adjectives</subject><subject>Cantonese</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Conjunctions</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Diachrony and historical linguistics</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical constructions</subject><subject>Grammaticalization</subject><subject>Iconicity</subject><subject>Japanese language</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Postpositions</subject><subject>Predicates</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Semantic categories</subject><subject>Semantic change</subject><subject>Syntactic change</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntactics</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Syntax semantics relationship</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0022-2267</issn><issn>1469-7742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P20AQhlcVSA2hP6AHJAuJ3gyz3u8bUVQCKhJKv66r6XqdOPgj7NoS8OtrN1EO5cBeRtrnmdHMS8hnCpcUqLr6AZANTypQANwI-oFMKJcmVYpnR2Qy4nTkH8lJjBsAysDoCbmeJXVfdWVat3lfYUhwuw0tunXStckqYN5jlbg1NiuflM34U9fYlQ6r8nWobXNKjgusov-0r1Py6-brz_ltev-wuJvP7lPHDXSpzHIpkGY6o1xl4DwTORQ0F1h4gV4WXBSgKGDh_vBceJNzw3OgXlMNItNsSr7s5g7rPfU-drYuo_NVhY1v-2i1kFJJyd4VmTSGMzOK5_-Jm7YPzXCEpUYyxbmCQaI7yYU2xuALuw1ljeHFUrBj8vZN8kPPxX4wxiGoImDjynhozAA0aDoucLbzNrFrw4FzAKHh38npjpex888HjuHRSsWUsHKxtMvl97n-Zrj9zf4CB6aZlA</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>FRANCIS, ELAINE J.</creator><creator>YUASA, ETSUYO</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization</title><author>FRANCIS, ELAINE J. ; YUASA, ETSUYO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adjectives</topic><topic>Cantonese</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Conjunctions</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Diachrony and historical linguistics</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical constructions</topic><topic>Grammaticalization</topic><topic>Iconicity</topic><topic>Japanese language</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Postpositions</topic><topic>Predicates</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Semantic categories</topic><topic>Semantic change</topic><topic>Syntactic change</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntactics</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Syntax semantics relationship</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRANCIS, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUASA, ETSUYO</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Proquest Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRANCIS, ELAINE J.</au><au>YUASA, ETSUYO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>45-86</pages><issn>0022-2267</issn><eissn>1469-7742</eissn><coden>JLINAJ</coden><notes>PII:S0022226707004951</notes><notes>ArticleID:00495</notes><notes>istex:8D6E8A798FB5BD43D4CA70B98C6AA42071972A54</notes><notes>ark:/67375/6GQ-QQRC8K94-V</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><abstract>Examining four constructions in three languages (English quantificational nouns, Japanese subordinating conjunctions, Cantonese coverbs, Japanese deverbal post-positions), this paper shows that semantic properties can change faster than syntactic properties in gradual processes of grammaticalization. In each of these cases, the syntactic properties of one category become associated with the semantic properties of a different category when an item undergoes semantic change, leading to the appearance of mixed categorial properties. We propose that this sort of change is best captured using a multi-modular framework (Sadock 1991, Yuasa 2005), which allows changes to affect semantics independently of syntax, and which shows clearly that the relevant items and constructions still conform to the separate structural constraints of syntax and semantics, despite the unusual combination of properties. These findings are important for theories of grammaticalization because they suggest that the cover term 'decategorialization' (the loss of grammatical properties associated with the source category) must be understood in terms of at least two separate processes: (1) the effects of semantic change on an item's distribution; and (2) the effects of frequency (Bybee & Hopper 2001) and Pressure for Structure-Concept Iconicity (Newmeyer 1998) on an item's syntactic categorization. Our case studies show that the first kind of decategorialization effects can occur even in the absence of the second kind. Implications of these findings, including possible reasons for both the instability and the long-term retention of mismatch constructions, are also considered.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022226707004951</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2267 |
ispartof | Journal of linguistics, 2008-03, Vol.44 (1), p.45-86 |
issn | 0022-2267 1469-7742 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85667663 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Art, Design & Architecture Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adjectives Cantonese Case studies Changes Chinese languages Conjunctions Construction Diachrony and historical linguistics English language Grammar Grammatical constructions Grammaticalization Iconicity Japanese language Languages Linguistics Nouns Postpositions Predicates Product development Semantic categories Semantic change Syntactic change Syntactic structures Syntactics Syntax Syntax semantics relationship Verbs |
title | A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T04%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi-modular%20approach%20to%20gradual%20change%20in%20grammaticalization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20linguistics&rft.au=FRANCIS,%20ELAINE%20J.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=45-86&rft.issn=0022-2267&rft.eissn=1469-7742&rft.coden=JLINAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022226707004951&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40058028%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-62d65a128214720ce35d0f1d5afe5ae6f45f0710afcb4d5e9d494d01e81805283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196374470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40058028&rfr_iscdi=true |