Loading…
Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance
In Exp. 1, 50 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of adding a feed flavor to the creep diet on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed ("eaters") and preweaning performance. Sows were blocked according to parity and date of farrowing and allotted to 2 experimental...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of animal science 2010-12, Vol.88 (12), p.3918-3926 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 3926 |
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 3918 |
| container_title | Journal of animal science |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | Sulabo, R.C Tokach, M.D DeRouchey, J.M Dritz, S.S Goodband, R.D Nelssen, J.L |
| description | In Exp. 1, 50 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of adding a feed flavor to the creep diet on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed ("eaters") and preweaning performance. Sows were blocked according to parity and date of farrowing and allotted to 2 experimental treatments: 1) litters fed a creep diet with no flavor (negative control) or 2) negative control diet with the feed flavor (Luctarom) included at 1,500 mg/kg. Both creep diets contained 1.0% chromic oxide and were offered ad libitum from d 18 until weaning at d 21. Adding flavor to the creep diet did not (P > 0.41) affect weaning weights, total BW gain, ADG, total creep feed intake, daily creep feed intake, or the proportion of creep feed eaters in whole litters. In Exp. 2, 480 weanling pigs (6.58 ± 0.41 kg; 20 ± 2 d) from Exp. 1 were randomly selected by preweaning treatment group, blocked by initial BW, and allotted to 1 of 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design to determine the interactive effects of preweaning exposure to flavor (exposed vs. unexposed), nursery diet complexity (complex vs. simple), and flavor addition to nursery diets (with vs. without flavor). Each treatment had 10 replications (pens) with 6 pigs per pen. Diets with flavor were supplemented with the flavor at 1,500 mg/kg in phase 1 diets and 1,000 mg/kg in phase 2 diets. A tendency for a 3-way interaction for ADG from d 5 to 10 (P = 0.10), 10 to 28 (P = 0.09), and 0 to 28 (P = 0.06) was observed. Postweaning ADG of pigs exposed to flavor in creep feed and fed flavored complex diets in the nursery was greater than pigs in any other treatment combination. Increasing diet complexity improved (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI during both postweaning phases. Adding flavor to creep feed had no effect on G:F (P > 0.34) and pig BW (P > 0.45) in both postweaning periods. Adding flavor to starter diets tended to improve ADFI (P = 0.06) during d 0 to 5. In conclusion, adding flavor to the creep feed did not affect litter creep feed intake, the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed, or preweaning performance when creep was provided for 3 d before weaning. Preweaning exposure to feed flavor improved postweaning ADG in pigs fed complex diets supplemented with the same flavor but did not influence performance of pigs fed simple diets. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2009-2724 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851466775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>812129238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f296t-92fc49c06b2f9e25dd8c700b2cf496ddcd29420fbcd1378fc06617a93bcfb3353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0DtPwzAUBWALgWgpjKzgBTGl2NexHY-o4lGpEgN0jhw_qlR5YSdA_z2RWoTYmM7y6Vzdg9AlJXPgIO-2Os6BEJWAhPQITSkHnjAq2DGaEgI0yTIKE3QW45YQClzxUzQBkjEmJZmifNn4anCNcbj12Dtnsa_0Rxsi1o3FzRCiCztsS9dj09Zd5b7KfofbBnfBfTrdlM3mj-zKDe5c8G2o9dh6jk68rqK7OOQMrR8f3hbPyerlabm4XyUelOgTBd6kyhBRgFcOuLWZkYQUYHyqhLXGgkqB-MJYymTmRymo1IoVxheMcTZDt_veLrTvg4t9XpfRuKrSjWuHmGecpkJI-Q9JgYIClo3y6iCHonY270JZ67DLf9Ybwc0B6Gh05cP4cRl_HRNAOKeju947r9tcb8Jo1q9AKCNUjbeEZN_wmIhM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>812129238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance</title><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Sulabo, R.C ; Tokach, M.D ; DeRouchey, J.M ; Dritz, S.S ; Goodband, R.D ; Nelssen, J.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sulabo, R.C ; Tokach, M.D ; DeRouchey, J.M ; Dritz, S.S ; Goodband, R.D ; Nelssen, J.L</creatorcontrib><description>In Exp. 1, 50 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of adding a feed flavor to the creep diet on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed ("eaters") and preweaning performance. Sows were blocked according to parity and date of farrowing and allotted to 2 experimental treatments: 1) litters fed a creep diet with no flavor (negative control) or 2) negative control diet with the feed flavor (Luctarom) included at 1,500 mg/kg. Both creep diets contained 1.0% chromic oxide and were offered ad libitum from d 18 until weaning at d 21. Adding flavor to the creep diet did not (P > 0.41) affect weaning weights, total BW gain, ADG, total creep feed intake, daily creep feed intake, or the proportion of creep feed eaters in whole litters. In Exp. 2, 480 weanling pigs (6.58 ± 0.41 kg; 20 ± 2 d) from Exp. 1 were randomly selected by preweaning treatment group, blocked by initial BW, and allotted to 1 of 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design to determine the interactive effects of preweaning exposure to flavor (exposed vs. unexposed), nursery diet complexity (complex vs. simple), and flavor addition to nursery diets (with vs. without flavor). Each treatment had 10 replications (pens) with 6 pigs per pen. Diets with flavor were supplemented with the flavor at 1,500 mg/kg in phase 1 diets and 1,000 mg/kg in phase 2 diets. A tendency for a 3-way interaction for ADG from d 5 to 10 (P = 0.10), 10 to 28 (P = 0.09), and 0 to 28 (P = 0.06) was observed. Postweaning ADG of pigs exposed to flavor in creep feed and fed flavored complex diets in the nursery was greater than pigs in any other treatment combination. Increasing diet complexity improved (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI during both postweaning phases. Adding flavor to creep feed had no effect on G:F (P > 0.34) and pig BW (P > 0.45) in both postweaning periods. Adding flavor to starter diets tended to improve ADFI (P = 0.06) during d 0 to 5. In conclusion, adding flavor to the creep feed did not affect litter creep feed intake, the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed, or preweaning performance when creep was provided for 3 d before weaning. Preweaning exposure to feed flavor improved postweaning ADG in pigs fed complex diets supplemented with the same flavor but did not influence performance of pigs fed simple diets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2724</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20833770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign, IL: American Society of Animal Science</publisher><subject>ad libitum feeding ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; complex diets ; creep diets ; diet ; Diet - veterinary ; diet complexity ; Eating - drug effects ; Feed and pet food industries ; feed conversion ; feed intake ; feed rations ; feeding behavior ; Female ; flavor ; Flavoring Agents - pharmacology ; Food Deprivation ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; litters (young animals) ; liveweight gain ; Male ; palatability ; piglet feeding ; piglets ; simple diets ; starter diets ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; weaning ; weaning weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2010-12, Vol.88 (12), p.3918-3926</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23620551$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20833770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sulabo, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokach, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRouchey, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dritz, S.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodband, R.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelssen, J.L</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>In Exp. 1, 50 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of adding a feed flavor to the creep diet on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed ("eaters") and preweaning performance. Sows were blocked according to parity and date of farrowing and allotted to 2 experimental treatments: 1) litters fed a creep diet with no flavor (negative control) or 2) negative control diet with the feed flavor (Luctarom) included at 1,500 mg/kg. Both creep diets contained 1.0% chromic oxide and were offered ad libitum from d 18 until weaning at d 21. Adding flavor to the creep diet did not (P > 0.41) affect weaning weights, total BW gain, ADG, total creep feed intake, daily creep feed intake, or the proportion of creep feed eaters in whole litters. In Exp. 2, 480 weanling pigs (6.58 ± 0.41 kg; 20 ± 2 d) from Exp. 1 were randomly selected by preweaning treatment group, blocked by initial BW, and allotted to 1 of 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design to determine the interactive effects of preweaning exposure to flavor (exposed vs. unexposed), nursery diet complexity (complex vs. simple), and flavor addition to nursery diets (with vs. without flavor). Each treatment had 10 replications (pens) with 6 pigs per pen. Diets with flavor were supplemented with the flavor at 1,500 mg/kg in phase 1 diets and 1,000 mg/kg in phase 2 diets. A tendency for a 3-way interaction for ADG from d 5 to 10 (P = 0.10), 10 to 28 (P = 0.09), and 0 to 28 (P = 0.06) was observed. Postweaning ADG of pigs exposed to flavor in creep feed and fed flavored complex diets in the nursery was greater than pigs in any other treatment combination. Increasing diet complexity improved (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI during both postweaning phases. Adding flavor to creep feed had no effect on G:F (P > 0.34) and pig BW (P > 0.45) in both postweaning periods. Adding flavor to starter diets tended to improve ADFI (P = 0.06) during d 0 to 5. In conclusion, adding flavor to the creep feed did not affect litter creep feed intake, the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed, or preweaning performance when creep was provided for 3 d before weaning. Preweaning exposure to feed flavor improved postweaning ADG in pigs fed complex diets supplemented with the same flavor but did not influence performance of pigs fed simple diets.</description><subject>ad libitum feeding</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>complex diets</subject><subject>creep diets</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>diet complexity</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>feed rations</subject><subject>feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>flavor</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Food Deprivation</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>litters (young animals)</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>palatability</subject><subject>piglet feeding</subject><subject>piglets</subject><subject>simple diets</subject><subject>starter diets</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>weaning</subject><subject>weaning weight</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0DtPwzAUBWALgWgpjKzgBTGl2NexHY-o4lGpEgN0jhw_qlR5YSdA_z2RWoTYmM7y6Vzdg9AlJXPgIO-2Os6BEJWAhPQITSkHnjAq2DGaEgI0yTIKE3QW45YQClzxUzQBkjEmJZmifNn4anCNcbj12Dtnsa_0Rxsi1o3FzRCiCztsS9dj09Zd5b7KfofbBnfBfTrdlM3mj-zKDe5c8G2o9dh6jk68rqK7OOQMrR8f3hbPyerlabm4XyUelOgTBd6kyhBRgFcOuLWZkYQUYHyqhLXGgkqB-MJYymTmRymo1IoVxheMcTZDt_veLrTvg4t9XpfRuKrSjWuHmGecpkJI-Q9JgYIClo3y6iCHonY270JZ67DLf9Ybwc0B6Gh05cP4cRl_HRNAOKeju947r9tcb8Jo1q9AKCNUjbeEZN_wmIhM</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Sulabo, R.C</creator><creator>Tokach, M.D</creator><creator>DeRouchey, J.M</creator><creator>Dritz, S.S</creator><creator>Goodband, R.D</creator><creator>Nelssen, J.L</creator><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance</title><author>Sulabo, R.C ; Tokach, M.D ; DeRouchey, J.M ; Dritz, S.S ; Goodband, R.D ; Nelssen, J.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f296t-92fc49c06b2f9e25dd8c700b2cf496ddcd29420fbcd1378fc06617a93bcfb3353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ad libitum feeding</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>complex diets</topic><topic>creep diets</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>diet complexity</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>feed rations</topic><topic>feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>flavor</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Food Deprivation</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>litters (young animals)</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>palatability</topic><topic>piglet feeding</topic><topic>piglets</topic><topic>simple diets</topic><topic>starter diets</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>weaning</topic><topic>weaning weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sulabo, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokach, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRouchey, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dritz, S.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodband, R.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelssen, J.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sulabo, R.C</au><au>Tokach, M.D</au><au>DeRouchey, J.M</au><au>Dritz, S.S</au><au>Goodband, R.D</au><au>Nelssen, J.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3918</spage><epage>3926</epage><pages>3918-3926</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-News-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-3</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>In Exp. 1, 50 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of adding a feed flavor to the creep diet on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed ("eaters") and preweaning performance. Sows were blocked according to parity and date of farrowing and allotted to 2 experimental treatments: 1) litters fed a creep diet with no flavor (negative control) or 2) negative control diet with the feed flavor (Luctarom) included at 1,500 mg/kg. Both creep diets contained 1.0% chromic oxide and were offered ad libitum from d 18 until weaning at d 21. Adding flavor to the creep diet did not (P > 0.41) affect weaning weights, total BW gain, ADG, total creep feed intake, daily creep feed intake, or the proportion of creep feed eaters in whole litters. In Exp. 2, 480 weanling pigs (6.58 ± 0.41 kg; 20 ± 2 d) from Exp. 1 were randomly selected by preweaning treatment group, blocked by initial BW, and allotted to 1 of 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design to determine the interactive effects of preweaning exposure to flavor (exposed vs. unexposed), nursery diet complexity (complex vs. simple), and flavor addition to nursery diets (with vs. without flavor). Each treatment had 10 replications (pens) with 6 pigs per pen. Diets with flavor were supplemented with the flavor at 1,500 mg/kg in phase 1 diets and 1,000 mg/kg in phase 2 diets. A tendency for a 3-way interaction for ADG from d 5 to 10 (P = 0.10), 10 to 28 (P = 0.09), and 0 to 28 (P = 0.06) was observed. Postweaning ADG of pigs exposed to flavor in creep feed and fed flavored complex diets in the nursery was greater than pigs in any other treatment combination. Increasing diet complexity improved (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI during both postweaning phases. Adding flavor to creep feed had no effect on G:F (P > 0.34) and pig BW (P > 0.45) in both postweaning periods. Adding flavor to starter diets tended to improve ADFI (P = 0.06) during d 0 to 5. In conclusion, adding flavor to the creep feed did not affect litter creep feed intake, the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed, or preweaning performance when creep was provided for 3 d before weaning. Preweaning exposure to feed flavor improved postweaning ADG in pigs fed complex diets supplemented with the same flavor but did not influence performance of pigs fed simple diets.</abstract><cop>Champaign, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Animal Science</pub><pmid>20833770</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2009-2724</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
| ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2010-12, Vol.88 (12), p.3918-3926 |
| issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851466775 |
| source | Oxford Journals |
| subjects | ad libitum feeding Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences complex diets creep diets diet Diet - veterinary diet complexity Eating - drug effects Feed and pet food industries feed conversion feed intake feed rations feeding behavior Female flavor Flavoring Agents - pharmacology Food Deprivation Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology litters (young animals) liveweight gain Male palatability piglet feeding piglets simple diets starter diets Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates weaning weaning weight |
| title | Influence of feed flavors and nursery diet complexity on preweaning and nursery pig performance |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T20%3A25%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20feed%20flavors%20and%20nursery%20diet%20complexity%20on%20preweaning%20and%20nursery%20pig%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Sulabo,%20R.C&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3918&rft.epage=3926&rft.pages=3918-3926&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2009-2724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E812129238%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f296t-92fc49c06b2f9e25dd8c700b2cf496ddcd29420fbcd1378fc06617a93bcfb3353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=812129238&rft_id=info:pmid/20833770&rfr_iscdi=true |