Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care

Establishing the efficacy of emergency care for patients--what should or should not be done in the emergency department--requires patients to come to an ED under close-to-ideal situations, and on leaving the ED to be treated under ideal circumstances. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are neede...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of emergency medicine 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.299-300
Main Author: BROOK, R. H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Emergency Service, Hospital - standards
Health and social institutions
Health Services Research
Humans
Medical sciences
Organization
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Quality of Health Care
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383
container_end_page 300
container_issue 3
container_start_page 299
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 31
creator BROOK, R. H
description Establishing the efficacy of emergency care for patients--what should or should not be done in the emergency department--requires patients to come to an ED under close-to-ideal situations, and on leaving the ED to be treated under ideal circumstances. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to answer the efficacy question.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70337-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79732138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79732138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-hEIOIopEZz-ymz1K8QsKHqznZbrZlEjS1J0G6b83raGngXmfdwYexqYcHjhw_fgJ3OoUtFK3Nr8zIKVJ5Qkbc7Am1UbDKRsfkXN2QfQNAFYJPmIjm_XbXI3Z_aL9xVgkSBSIqvUqabutb5tASVsmoQlxFdZ-l3iM4ZKdlVhTuBrmhH29PC9mb-n84_V99jRPvZRym4oyMxIyKH3_JUMhCwu-UBiWAAhFkQdlbYZaGa8y5CD4UudCGeG1QitzOWE3_3c3sf3pAm1dU5EPdY3r0HbkjDVS8AOY_YM-tkQxlG4TqwbjznFwe0nuIMntDTibu4MkJ_vedHjQLZtQHFuDlT6_HnIkj3UZce0rOmJCapNzJf8A1uhtHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79732138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>BROOK, R. H</creator><creatorcontrib>BROOK, R. H</creatorcontrib><description>Establishing the efficacy of emergency care for patients--what should or should not be done in the emergency department--requires patients to come to an ED under close-to-ideal situations, and on leaving the ED to be treated under ideal circumstances. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to answer the efficacy question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70337-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9506484</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEMED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Health and social institutions ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Organization ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quality of Health Care ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.299-300</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,786,790,795,796,23958,23959,25170,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2367814$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9506484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BROOK, R. H</creatorcontrib><title>Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Establishing the efficacy of emergency care for patients--what should or should not be done in the emergency department--requires patients to come to an ED under close-to-ideal situations, and on leaving the ED to be treated under ideal circumstances. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to answer the efficacy question.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Health and social institutions</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-hEIOIopEZz-ymz1K8QsKHqznZbrZlEjS1J0G6b83raGngXmfdwYexqYcHjhw_fgJ3OoUtFK3Nr8zIKVJ5Qkbc7Am1UbDKRsfkXN2QfQNAFYJPmIjm_XbXI3Z_aL9xVgkSBSIqvUqabutb5tASVsmoQlxFdZ-l3iM4ZKdlVhTuBrmhH29PC9mb-n84_V99jRPvZRym4oyMxIyKH3_JUMhCwu-UBiWAAhFkQdlbYZaGa8y5CD4UudCGeG1QitzOWE3_3c3sf3pAm1dU5EPdY3r0HbkjDVS8AOY_YM-tkQxlG4TqwbjznFwe0nuIMntDTibu4MkJ_vedHjQLZtQHFuDlT6_HnIkj3UZce0rOmJCapNzJf8A1uhtHg</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>BROOK, R. H</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care</title><author>BROOK, R. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Health and social institutions</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BROOK, R. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BROOK, R. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>299-300</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><coden>AEMED3</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-3</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Commentary-1</notes><abstract>Establishing the efficacy of emergency care for patients--what should or should not be done in the emergency department--requires patients to come to an ED under close-to-ideal situations, and on leaving the ED to be treated under ideal circumstances. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to answer the efficacy question.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>9506484</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70337-3</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.299-300
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79732138
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Emergency Service, Hospital - standards
Health and social institutions
Health Services Research
Humans
Medical sciences
Organization
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Quality of Health Care
United States
title Toward assessing outcomes of emergency care
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T07%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20assessing%20outcomes%20of%20emergency%20care&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=BROOK,%20R.%20H&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=299-300&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft.coden=AEMED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70337-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79732138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2f573050fc9505a23d90cd4aeb00a0dd8e4995a647c45a1021b682472c64a9383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79732138&rft_id=info:pmid/9506484&rfr_iscdi=true