Loading…

A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation

Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley & So...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation 2010-03, Vol.24 (2), p.E35-E42
Main Authors: Hwang, Shin, Lee, Sung-Gyu, Ahn, Chul-Soo, Kim, Ki-Hun, Moon, Deok-Bog, Ha, Tae-Yong, Song, Gi-Won, Jung, Dong-Hwan, Choi, Nam-Kyu, Kim, Kwan-Woo, Yu, Young-Dong, Park, Gil-Chun, Park, Pyoung-Jae, Choi, Young-Il
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3
container_end_page E42
container_issue 2
container_start_page E35
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 24
creator Hwang, Shin
Lee, Sung-Gyu
Ahn, Chul-Soo
Kim, Ki-Hun
Moon, Deok-Bog
Ha, Tae-Yong
Song, Gi-Won
Jung, Dong-Hwan
Choi, Nam-Kyu
Kim, Kwan-Woo
Yu, Young-Dong
Park, Gil-Chun
Park, Pyoung-Jae
Choi, Young-Il
description Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. : Background:  Recent findings have suggested the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Aim:  To assess whether routine mycophenolic acid (MPA) TDM is beneficial and how to utilize it. Methods:  A series of short‐term prospective studies on TDM for MPA and/or tacrolimus was performed at a large‐volume center. Results:  The 673 adult liver transplants were divided into four groups based on immunosuppressive regimens as tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 369), tacrolimus–MMF therapy (n = 270), MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy (n = 17), and MMF monotherapy (n = 17). There was a significant difference of tacrolimus concentration between the groups receiving tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus–MMF therapy during the first two yr (at two yr: 8.4 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL; p ≤ 0.002). MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy and MMF monotherapy were applied after first three months and MPA levels ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 μg/mL. Correlation between MMF dosage and MPA concentration showed wide interindividual variations (n = 304, r2 = 0.271, p 2.0 μg/mL in 56.5%. Conclusion:  MPA TDM‐based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing. MPA TDM appears to be a useful tool to cope with the wide pharmacokinetic variability of MMF after liver transplantation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01166.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733594957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733594957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwyAYx4nR6Hz5Coabp1YoFMrBg2l8i4uaZcbEC2Etm8y2TGC6fXup053lAA_w_z2QHwAQoxTHcT5PMREiQQhnaYaQSBHGjKWrHTDYXuyCARIoizUjB-DQ-3k8ZZjl--AgMhwRLAZgdAmrxnSmUg1U3mvvW90FaKewXVd28aY726igYe2WM9jazgTrTDeDahq0g435jHNwqvOLRnVBBWO7Y7A3VY3XJ7_rEXi-vhqXt8nw8eauvBwmFeUZS7DORFHXvOCKMcXEpGZFluGcTkRBChT3hNMaUapQRSmnWheE11TwglEq2IQcgbNN34WzH0vtg2yNr3QTP6Lt0ktOSC6oyHlMFptk5az3Tk_lwplWubXESPZC5Vz23mTvTfZC5Y9QuYro6e8jy0mr6y34ZzAGLjaBL9Po9b8by3I86qvIJxve-KBXW165d8k44bl8ebiRI06H969lKZ_IN10LkxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733594957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hwang, Shin ; Lee, Sung-Gyu ; Ahn, Chul-Soo ; Kim, Ki-Hun ; Moon, Deok-Bog ; Ha, Tae-Yong ; Song, Gi-Won ; Jung, Dong-Hwan ; Choi, Nam-Kyu ; Kim, Kwan-Woo ; Yu, Young-Dong ; Park, Gil-Chun ; Park, Pyoung-Jae ; Choi, Young-Il</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Shin ; Lee, Sung-Gyu ; Ahn, Chul-Soo ; Kim, Ki-Hun ; Moon, Deok-Bog ; Ha, Tae-Yong ; Song, Gi-Won ; Jung, Dong-Hwan ; Choi, Nam-Kyu ; Kim, Kwan-Woo ; Yu, Young-Dong ; Park, Gil-Chun ; Park, Pyoung-Jae ; Choi, Young-Il</creatorcontrib><description>Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. : Background:  Recent findings have suggested the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Aim:  To assess whether routine mycophenolic acid (MPA) TDM is beneficial and how to utilize it. Methods:  A series of short‐term prospective studies on TDM for MPA and/or tacrolimus was performed at a large‐volume center. Results:  The 673 adult liver transplants were divided into four groups based on immunosuppressive regimens as tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 369), tacrolimus–MMF therapy (n = 270), MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy (n = 17), and MMF monotherapy (n = 17). There was a significant difference of tacrolimus concentration between the groups receiving tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus–MMF therapy during the first two yr (at two yr: 8.4 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL; p ≤ 0.002). MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy and MMF monotherapy were applied after first three months and MPA levels ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 μg/mL. Correlation between MMF dosage and MPA concentration showed wide interindividual variations (n = 304, r2 = 0.271, p &lt; 0.001), in which r2 was fluctuating from 0.056 to 0.213 according to the post‐transplant period over five yr; wide intraindividual variation was also observed during the first two months (n = 12, r2 &lt; 0.2, p &gt; 0.195). About 10% of patients were classified as poor MMF absorber and excluded from MMF usage. Mean MPA level leading to successful MMF monotherapy or MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy was ≥1.0 μg/mL in 87% and &gt;2.0 μg/mL in 56.5%. Conclusion:  MPA TDM‐based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing. MPA TDM appears to be a useful tool to cope with the wide pharmacokinetic variability of MMF after liver transplantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01166.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20070319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Drug Monitoring ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; immunosuppression ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mycophenolate mofetil ; mycophenolic acid ; Mycophenolic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Mycophenolic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use ; Postoperative Period ; Tacrolimus - therapeutic use ; therapeutic drug monitoring</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2010-03, Vol.24 (2), p.E35-E42</ispartof><rights>2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1399-0012.2009.01166.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1399-0012.2009.01166.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20070319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung-Gyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Chul-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Deok-Bog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Tae-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Gi-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dong-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwan-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Young-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Gil-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Pyoung-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young-Il</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. : Background:  Recent findings have suggested the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Aim:  To assess whether routine mycophenolic acid (MPA) TDM is beneficial and how to utilize it. Methods:  A series of short‐term prospective studies on TDM for MPA and/or tacrolimus was performed at a large‐volume center. Results:  The 673 adult liver transplants were divided into four groups based on immunosuppressive regimens as tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 369), tacrolimus–MMF therapy (n = 270), MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy (n = 17), and MMF monotherapy (n = 17). There was a significant difference of tacrolimus concentration between the groups receiving tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus–MMF therapy during the first two yr (at two yr: 8.4 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL; p ≤ 0.002). MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy and MMF monotherapy were applied after first three months and MPA levels ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 μg/mL. Correlation between MMF dosage and MPA concentration showed wide interindividual variations (n = 304, r2 = 0.271, p &lt; 0.001), in which r2 was fluctuating from 0.056 to 0.213 according to the post‐transplant period over five yr; wide intraindividual variation was also observed during the first two months (n = 12, r2 &lt; 0.2, p &gt; 0.195). About 10% of patients were classified as poor MMF absorber and excluded from MMF usage. Mean MPA level leading to successful MMF monotherapy or MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy was ≥1.0 μg/mL in 87% and &gt;2.0 μg/mL in 56.5%. Conclusion:  MPA TDM‐based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing. MPA TDM appears to be a useful tool to cope with the wide pharmacokinetic variability of MMF after liver transplantation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Drug Monitoring</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunosuppression</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mycophenolate mofetil</subject><subject>mycophenolic acid</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>therapeutic drug monitoring</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwyAYx4nR6Hz5Coabp1YoFMrBg2l8i4uaZcbEC2Etm8y2TGC6fXup053lAA_w_z2QHwAQoxTHcT5PMREiQQhnaYaQSBHGjKWrHTDYXuyCARIoizUjB-DQ-3k8ZZjl--AgMhwRLAZgdAmrxnSmUg1U3mvvW90FaKewXVd28aY726igYe2WM9jazgTrTDeDahq0g435jHNwqvOLRnVBBWO7Y7A3VY3XJ7_rEXi-vhqXt8nw8eauvBwmFeUZS7DORFHXvOCKMcXEpGZFluGcTkRBChT3hNMaUapQRSmnWheE11TwglEq2IQcgbNN34WzH0vtg2yNr3QTP6Lt0ktOSC6oyHlMFptk5az3Tk_lwplWubXESPZC5Vz23mTvTfZC5Y9QuYro6e8jy0mr6y34ZzAGLjaBL9Po9b8by3I86qvIJxve-KBXW165d8k44bl8ebiRI06H969lKZ_IN10LkxA</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Hwang, Shin</creator><creator>Lee, Sung-Gyu</creator><creator>Ahn, Chul-Soo</creator><creator>Kim, Ki-Hun</creator><creator>Moon, Deok-Bog</creator><creator>Ha, Tae-Yong</creator><creator>Song, Gi-Won</creator><creator>Jung, Dong-Hwan</creator><creator>Choi, Nam-Kyu</creator><creator>Kim, Kwan-Woo</creator><creator>Yu, Young-Dong</creator><creator>Park, Gil-Chun</creator><creator>Park, Pyoung-Jae</creator><creator>Choi, Young-Il</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation</title><author>Hwang, Shin ; Lee, Sung-Gyu ; Ahn, Chul-Soo ; Kim, Ki-Hun ; Moon, Deok-Bog ; Ha, Tae-Yong ; Song, Gi-Won ; Jung, Dong-Hwan ; Choi, Nam-Kyu ; Kim, Kwan-Woo ; Yu, Young-Dong ; Park, Gil-Chun ; Park, Pyoung-Jae ; Choi, Young-Il</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Drug Monitoring</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunosuppression</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mycophenolate mofetil</topic><topic>mycophenolic acid</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>therapeutic drug monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung-Gyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Chul-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Deok-Bog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Tae-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Gi-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dong-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwan-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Young-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Gil-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Pyoung-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young-Il</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Shin</au><au>Lee, Sung-Gyu</au><au>Ahn, Chul-Soo</au><au>Kim, Ki-Hun</au><au>Moon, Deok-Bog</au><au>Ha, Tae-Yong</au><au>Song, Gi-Won</au><au>Jung, Dong-Hwan</au><au>Choi, Nam-Kyu</au><au>Kim, Kwan-Woo</au><au>Yu, Young-Dong</au><au>Park, Gil-Chun</au><au>Park, Pyoung-Jae</au><au>Choi, Young-Il</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>E35</spage><epage>E42</epage><pages>E35-E42</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><notes>istex:B010C34721131A869C304B34AE37F8856BDDD62B</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-R74LKZCC-P</notes><notes>ArticleID:CTR1166</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. : Background:  Recent findings have suggested the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Aim:  To assess whether routine mycophenolic acid (MPA) TDM is beneficial and how to utilize it. Methods:  A series of short‐term prospective studies on TDM for MPA and/or tacrolimus was performed at a large‐volume center. Results:  The 673 adult liver transplants were divided into four groups based on immunosuppressive regimens as tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 369), tacrolimus–MMF therapy (n = 270), MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy (n = 17), and MMF monotherapy (n = 17). There was a significant difference of tacrolimus concentration between the groups receiving tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus–MMF therapy during the first two yr (at two yr: 8.4 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL; p ≤ 0.002). MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy and MMF monotherapy were applied after first three months and MPA levels ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 μg/mL. Correlation between MMF dosage and MPA concentration showed wide interindividual variations (n = 304, r2 = 0.271, p &lt; 0.001), in which r2 was fluctuating from 0.056 to 0.213 according to the post‐transplant period over five yr; wide intraindividual variation was also observed during the first two months (n = 12, r2 &lt; 0.2, p &gt; 0.195). About 10% of patients were classified as poor MMF absorber and excluded from MMF usage. Mean MPA level leading to successful MMF monotherapy or MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy was ≥1.0 μg/mL in 87% and &gt;2.0 μg/mL in 56.5%. Conclusion:  MPA TDM‐based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing. MPA TDM appears to be a useful tool to cope with the wide pharmacokinetic variability of MMF after liver transplantation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20070319</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01166.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2010-03, Vol.24 (2), p.E35-E42
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733594957
source Wiley
subjects Adult
Drug Monitoring
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
immunosuppression
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacokinetics
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Liver Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
mycophenolate mofetil
mycophenolic acid
Mycophenolic Acid - administration & dosage
Mycophenolic Acid - analogs & derivatives
Mycophenolic Acid - pharmacokinetics
Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use
Postoperative Period
Tacrolimus - therapeutic use
therapeutic drug monitoring
title A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T17%3A35%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20assessment%20of%20mycophenolate%20drug%20monitoring%20after%20liver%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Hwang,%20Shin&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E35&rft.epage=E42&rft.pages=E35-E42&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01166.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733594957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-1e298dd787a66a69bd6822154b983809bd374d044a0c4474ee837d497864496b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733594957&rft_id=info:pmid/20070319&rfr_iscdi=true