Loading…

Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions

The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2002-11, Vol.57 (3), p.297-302
Main Authors: Rickli, Hans, Unterweger, Martin, Sütsch, Gabor, Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter, Sagmeister, Markus, Ammann, Peter, Amann, Franz W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3
container_end_page 302
container_issue 3
container_start_page 297
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 57
creator Rickli, Hans
Unterweger, Martin
Sütsch, Gabor
Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter
Sagmeister, Markus
Ammann, Peter
Amann, Franz W.
description The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P < 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 ± 3.4 vs. 22.9 ± 14.0 min; P < 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture‐mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:297–302. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.10294
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72637386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72637386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtv1DAUha0K1JbCgj-AvEJiEepHHuMlCtAWjaiq8tpZjnMtXJJ48HXazm_gT-NhUlixsO710XeOrg4hzzl7zRkTp9b2eRGqPCDHvBKiaET97dGyc1XWR-QJ4g1jTNVCHZIjLkrOKsaPya82jBsTPYaJBkdtwITUTD1F4yBtd5qhOKc5QjFC702CntohYBZoD7feAr3z6Xt2TrcwJR8mM9DRTHMeNmdHQMwiNS5BzErMQNxSE_N3S_2Ux-LDp-SxMwPCs2WekM_v331qz4v15dlF-2ZdWKnKshBWKQedsG5Vc2UdWGUaVUnJueuYLSvHagaOu3K1e0p0JWsayVinuqoxTp6Ql_vcTQw_Z8CkR48WhsFMEGbUuT3ZyFWdwVd70MaAGMHpTfRjPl9zpnfN69y8_tN8Zl8soXOXi_pHLlVn4HQP3PkBtv9P0m379iGy2Ds8Jrj_6zDxh64b2VT668cz_WX1QV6xda2v5W_QEp_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72637386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rickli, Hans ; Unterweger, Martin ; Sütsch, Gabor ; Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter ; Sagmeister, Markus ; Ammann, Peter ; Amann, Franz W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rickli, Hans ; Unterweger, Martin ; Sütsch, Gabor ; Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter ; Sagmeister, Markus ; Ammann, Peter ; Amann, Franz W.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P &lt; 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 ± 3.4 vs. 22.9 ± 14.0 min; P &lt; 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture‐mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:297–302. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12410501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>access site ; Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - economics ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation ; arterial puncture site ; Bandages - economics ; cardiac catheterization ; Coronary Artery Disease - complications ; Coronary Artery Disease - economics ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; costs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Early Ambulation ; Equipment Safety - economics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemoglobins - metabolism ; Hemostasis, Surgical - economics ; Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - economics ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Suture Techniques - economics ; Suture Techniques - instrumentation ; Treatment Outcome ; vascular closure device</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2002-11, Vol.57 (3), p.297-302</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.10294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.10294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12410501$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rickli, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unterweger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sütsch, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagmeister, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amann, Franz W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P &lt; 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 ± 3.4 vs. 22.9 ± 14.0 min; P &lt; 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture‐mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:297–302. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>access site</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - economics</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</subject><subject>arterial puncture site</subject><subject>Bandages - economics</subject><subject>cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - economics</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Early Ambulation</subject><subject>Equipment Safety - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - metabolism</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical - economics</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - economics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - economics</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>vascular closure device</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtv1DAUha0K1JbCgj-AvEJiEepHHuMlCtAWjaiq8tpZjnMtXJJ48HXazm_gT-NhUlixsO710XeOrg4hzzl7zRkTp9b2eRGqPCDHvBKiaET97dGyc1XWR-QJ4g1jTNVCHZIjLkrOKsaPya82jBsTPYaJBkdtwITUTD1F4yBtd5qhOKc5QjFC702CntohYBZoD7feAr3z6Xt2TrcwJR8mM9DRTHMeNmdHQMwiNS5BzErMQNxSE_N3S_2Ux-LDp-SxMwPCs2WekM_v331qz4v15dlF-2ZdWKnKshBWKQedsG5Vc2UdWGUaVUnJueuYLSvHagaOu3K1e0p0JWsayVinuqoxTp6Ql_vcTQw_Z8CkR48WhsFMEGbUuT3ZyFWdwVd70MaAGMHpTfRjPl9zpnfN69y8_tN8Zl8soXOXi_pHLlVn4HQP3PkBtv9P0m379iGy2Ds8Jrj_6zDxh64b2VT668cz_WX1QV6xda2v5W_QEp_I</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Rickli, Hans</creator><creator>Unterweger, Martin</creator><creator>Sütsch, Gabor</creator><creator>Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter</creator><creator>Sagmeister, Markus</creator><creator>Ammann, Peter</creator><creator>Amann, Franz W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions</title><author>Rickli, Hans ; Unterweger, Martin ; Sütsch, Gabor ; Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter ; Sagmeister, Markus ; Ammann, Peter ; Amann, Franz W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>access site</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - economics</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</topic><topic>arterial puncture site</topic><topic>Bandages - economics</topic><topic>cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - economics</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Early Ambulation</topic><topic>Equipment Safety - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - metabolism</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical - economics</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - economics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - economics</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>vascular closure device</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rickli, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unterweger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sütsch, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagmeister, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amann, Franz W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rickli, Hans</au><au>Unterweger, Martin</au><au>Sütsch, Gabor</au><au>Brunner-La Rocca, Hans Peter</au><au>Sagmeister, Markus</au><au>Ammann, Peter</au><au>Amann, Franz W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>297-302</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><notes>istex:01829D8F560AB84692096C827B33F5778698EA1D</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-V8J3Q0L6-S</notes><notes>ArticleID:CCD10294</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-News-3</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture‐mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P &lt; 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 ± 3.4 vs. 22.9 ± 14.0 min; P &lt; 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture‐mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:297–302. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12410501</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.10294</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2002-11, Vol.57 (3), p.297-302
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72637386
source Wiley Online Library
subjects access site
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - economics
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation
arterial puncture site
Bandages - economics
cardiac catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease - complications
Coronary Artery Disease - economics
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Early Ambulation
Equipment Safety - economics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hemoglobins - metabolism
Hemostasis, Surgical - economics
Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - economics
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Suture Techniques - economics
Suture Techniques - instrumentation
Treatment Outcome
vascular closure device
title Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T12%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20costs%20and%20safety%20of%20a%20suture-mediated%20closure%20device%20with%20conventional%20manual%20compression%20after%20coronary%20artery%20interventions&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Rickli,%20Hans&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=297-302&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.10294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72637386%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-2c99feb2cf8619cfec9a7953311fb0c45f060ef1f481f4892b4077300b9b57af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72637386&rft_id=info:pmid/12410501&rfr_iscdi=true