Loading…

State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists

In 2000, the thirty‐six states with public dental schools provided an average subsidy of $49,347 per dental student. In contrast, nineteen states provided little or no subsidy. Since states invest in dental education, in part, to ensure an adequate supply of dentists, we examined the factors that ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dental education 2003-12, Vol.67 (12), p.1278-1285
Main Authors: Bailit, Howard L., Beazoglou, Tryfon J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3413-f95801fe59a3cdab76abc1dc6a1f5177abef19c3a0839af7c0c2305934c56fc23
cites
container_end_page 1285
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1278
container_title Journal of dental education
container_volume 67
creator Bailit, Howard L.
Beazoglou, Tryfon J.
description In 2000, the thirty‐six states with public dental schools provided an average subsidy of $49,347 per dental student. In contrast, nineteen states provided little or no subsidy. Since states invest in dental education, in part, to ensure an adequate supply of dentists, we examined the factors that explain dentist variation among states. We found that population size, per capita income, and the number of students from the state enrolled in dental school had a significant and positive impact. The level of state support for dental education and the presence of a dental school had a negative or nonsignificant effect, respectively. Apparently, dentists locate based primarily on the demand for their services and, to a lesser extent, on where they were raised. The states' investment in dental education had little impact on number of dentists because some states had many dentists but invested little in dental education. We identified two states that collectively account for 15 percent of enrolled students even though they provide minimal subsidy for dental education. We discuss the implications of these findings for states that do not have dental schools and need more dentists. This research was supported in part by grants from the Connecticut Health Foundation (Dental Workforce in Connecticut: Issues and Options), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the California Endowment (Pipeline, Profession, and Practice: Community‐Based Dental Education).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71522752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71522752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3413-f95801fe59a3cdab76abc1dc6a1f5177abef19c3a0839af7c0c2305934c56fc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1PgzAUhhujcXP6FwxXxhuwp6WUeuWyD92yxIvpdVNKa1gYIIW4_XshQ7325nzkPHlP8iB0DzgAjMnDLugq8TGlPCAY0yDiAZCgSTDlIILDGRqDoNjnMeXnaPwLj9CVc7tuFWFILtEIQk4pYfEYTbeNaoy3zApV6Kz48ErrzU3RqNxbpK1WTVYWj95qXyndeGXhbduqyo8_VOYad40urMqduRn6BL0vF2-zF3_z-ryaTTe-piFQ3woWY7CGCUV1qhIeqURDqiMFlgHnKjEWhKYKx1QoyzXWhGImaKhZZLt5gu5OuVVdfrbGNXKfOW3yXBWmbJ3kwAjhrAefTqCuS-dqY2VVZ3tVHyVg2WuUO9mbkb0Z2WuUEZdA5KBRHrqI2-FXm-xN-hcweOuA9Qn4ynJz_PcDuZ7PccQx9Ef6DQ2ShQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71522752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Bailit, Howard L. ; Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bailit, Howard L. ; Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2000, the thirty‐six states with public dental schools provided an average subsidy of $49,347 per dental student. In contrast, nineteen states provided little or no subsidy. Since states invest in dental education, in part, to ensure an adequate supply of dentists, we examined the factors that explain dentist variation among states. We found that population size, per capita income, and the number of students from the state enrolled in dental school had a significant and positive impact. The level of state support for dental education and the presence of a dental school had a negative or nonsignificant effect, respectively. Apparently, dentists locate based primarily on the demand for their services and, to a lesser extent, on where they were raised. The states' investment in dental education had little impact on number of dentists because some states had many dentists but invested little in dental education. We identified two states that collectively account for 15 percent of enrolled students even though they provide minimal subsidy for dental education. We discuss the implications of these findings for states that do not have dental schools and need more dentists. This research was supported in part by grants from the Connecticut Health Foundation (Dental Workforce in Connecticut: Issues and Options), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the California Endowment (Pipeline, Profession, and Practice: Community‐Based Dental Education).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14733258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Dental Education Association</publisher><subject>dental education ; dentist supply ; Dentistry ; Dentists - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Dentists - supply &amp; distribution ; Education, Dental - economics ; Education, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Education, Dental - trends ; Financing, Government - economics ; Financing, Government - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Financing, Government - trends ; Humans ; state funds ; State Government ; Training Support - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental education, 2003-12, Vol.67 (12), p.1278-1285</ispartof><rights>American Dental Education Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3413-f95801fe59a3cdab76abc1dc6a1f5177abef19c3a0839af7c0c2305934c56fc23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14733258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bailit, Howard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</creatorcontrib><title>State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists</title><title>Journal of dental education</title><addtitle>J Dent Educ</addtitle><description>In 2000, the thirty‐six states with public dental schools provided an average subsidy of $49,347 per dental student. In contrast, nineteen states provided little or no subsidy. Since states invest in dental education, in part, to ensure an adequate supply of dentists, we examined the factors that explain dentist variation among states. We found that population size, per capita income, and the number of students from the state enrolled in dental school had a significant and positive impact. The level of state support for dental education and the presence of a dental school had a negative or nonsignificant effect, respectively. Apparently, dentists locate based primarily on the demand for their services and, to a lesser extent, on where they were raised. The states' investment in dental education had little impact on number of dentists because some states had many dentists but invested little in dental education. We identified two states that collectively account for 15 percent of enrolled students even though they provide minimal subsidy for dental education. We discuss the implications of these findings for states that do not have dental schools and need more dentists. This research was supported in part by grants from the Connecticut Health Foundation (Dental Workforce in Connecticut: Issues and Options), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the California Endowment (Pipeline, Profession, and Practice: Community‐Based Dental Education).</description><subject>dental education</subject><subject>dentist supply</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dentists - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Education, Dental - economics</subject><subject>Education, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Education, Dental - trends</subject><subject>Financing, Government - economics</subject><subject>Financing, Government - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Financing, Government - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>state funds</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Training Support - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-0337</issn><issn>1930-7837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkF1PgzAUhhujcXP6FwxXxhuwp6WUeuWyD92yxIvpdVNKa1gYIIW4_XshQ7325nzkPHlP8iB0DzgAjMnDLugq8TGlPCAY0yDiAZCgSTDlIILDGRqDoNjnMeXnaPwLj9CVc7tuFWFILtEIQk4pYfEYTbeNaoy3zApV6Kz48ErrzU3RqNxbpK1WTVYWj95qXyndeGXhbduqyo8_VOYad40urMqduRn6BL0vF2-zF3_z-ryaTTe-piFQ3woWY7CGCUV1qhIeqURDqiMFlgHnKjEWhKYKx1QoyzXWhGImaKhZZLt5gu5OuVVdfrbGNXKfOW3yXBWmbJ3kwAjhrAefTqCuS-dqY2VVZ3tVHyVg2WuUO9mbkb0Z2WuUEZdA5KBRHrqI2-FXm-xN-hcweOuA9Qn4ynJz_PcDuZ7PccQx9Ef6DQ2ShQ0</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Bailit, Howard L.</creator><creator>Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</creator><general>American Dental Education Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists</title><author>Bailit, Howard L. ; Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3413-f95801fe59a3cdab76abc1dc6a1f5177abef19c3a0839af7c0c2305934c56fc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>dental education</topic><topic>dentist supply</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dentists - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Education, Dental - economics</topic><topic>Education, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Education, Dental - trends</topic><topic>Financing, Government - economics</topic><topic>Financing, Government - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Financing, Government - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>state funds</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Training Support - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bailit, Howard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bailit, Howard L.</au><au>Beazoglou, Tryfon J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental education</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Educ</addtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1278</spage><epage>1285</epage><pages>1278-1285</pages><issn>0022-0337</issn><eissn>1930-7837</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>In 2000, the thirty‐six states with public dental schools provided an average subsidy of $49,347 per dental student. In contrast, nineteen states provided little or no subsidy. Since states invest in dental education, in part, to ensure an adequate supply of dentists, we examined the factors that explain dentist variation among states. We found that population size, per capita income, and the number of students from the state enrolled in dental school had a significant and positive impact. The level of state support for dental education and the presence of a dental school had a negative or nonsignificant effect, respectively. Apparently, dentists locate based primarily on the demand for their services and, to a lesser extent, on where they were raised. The states' investment in dental education had little impact on number of dentists because some states had many dentists but invested little in dental education. We identified two states that collectively account for 15 percent of enrolled students even though they provide minimal subsidy for dental education. We discuss the implications of these findings for states that do not have dental schools and need more dentists. This research was supported in part by grants from the Connecticut Health Foundation (Dental Workforce in Connecticut: Issues and Options), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the California Endowment (Pipeline, Profession, and Practice: Community‐Based Dental Education).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Dental Education Association</pub><pmid>14733258</pmid><doi>10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0337
ispartof Journal of dental education, 2003-12, Vol.67 (12), p.1278-1285
issn 0022-0337
1930-7837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71522752
source Wiley
subjects dental education
dentist supply
Dentistry
Dentists - statistics & numerical data
Dentists - supply & distribution
Education, Dental - economics
Education, Dental - statistics & numerical data
Education, Dental - trends
Financing, Government - economics
Financing, Government - statistics & numerical data
Financing, Government - trends
Humans
state funds
State Government
Training Support - statistics & numerical data
United States
title State Financing of Dental Education: Impact on Supply of Dentists
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T21%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20Financing%20of%20Dental%20Education:%20Impact%20on%20Supply%20of%20Dentists&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20education&rft.au=Bailit,%20Howard%20L.&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1278&rft.epage=1285&rft.pages=1278-1285&rft.issn=0022-0337&rft.eissn=1930-7837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03719.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71522752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3413-f95801fe59a3cdab76abc1dc6a1f5177abef19c3a0839af7c0c2305934c56fc23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71522752&rft_id=info:pmid/14733258&rfr_iscdi=true